- US: Advance Trade & Inventories (Feb)
- Sweden: Retail Trade, PPI, International Trade (Feb); Iceland: CPI (Mar)
- Turkey: International Reserves (Feb); Mauritius: Wage Rate Index, LFS (Q4); Saudi Arabia: Non-Oil Foreign Trade (Jan); Palestine: BOP (Q4); UAE: Fuel Prices (Apr); Israel: Construction Starts & Completions (Q4); South Africa: Construction Survey (Q1); Tanzania: Trade (Q4)
- Brazil: PPI (Feb)
- more updates...
Economy in Brief
Texas Factory Sector Activity Remains Strong
The Dallas Fed indicated in its Texas Manufacturing Outlook Survey that the General Business Activity Index eased during March...
EMU Money and Credit Growth Are Less Than Impressive Than Euro-PMIs
EMU nominal money supply growth is slightly higher over three months, but credit growth in the EMU is slower...
Durable Goods Orders Strengthened by Another Jump in Aircraft
New orders for durable goods rose 1.7% (5.0% y/y) during February...
Correction to Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims
The Department of Labor has issued a correction to yesterday's annual revision to seasonally adjusted weekly unemployment claims...
EMU PMIs Are Off to the Races...Farewell Mediocrity?
The PMI rankings for the manufacturing and service sector PMIs in the EMU are suddenly off the chart...
U.S. New Home Sales Improve While Prices Decline
Sales of new single-family homes increased 6.1% (12.8% y/y) during February to 592,000 units (AR)...
by Robert Brusca October 10, 2016
The OECD LEIs remain mired in the muck of readings below the breakeven value of 100, but close enough for the OECD to continue to look for relatively stable growth. The overarching OECD index, the U.S. index, the U.K. index, the Japan Index and the China index, each sits below their respective 100 index level as of August. The OECD and Japan sit at 99.7, the U.K. is at 99.5, the U.S. is at 99.0 and China sits at its 98.9 index level. The EMU has a 100.3 standing, above its 100 mark, but not by much. On the month, only the U.S. index deteriorated while the Fed made plans to hike rates before yearend. The U.K. and Japan improved by small amounts; the rest of the indices were flat on the month. None of this is particularly worrisome or reassuring. It is the same sluggish environment that has evolved the global economy since the financial crisis came and went. However, what is interesting is that on both sides of the policy aisle policymakers are getting restless. Some think policy is dangerous because it has been too expansive for too long. Others think that the global economy is more at risk because growth remains stuck in such a low track with no sign of acceleration. Both sides are looking to do something to remedy their respective concerns. In the U.S., despite uneven growth and slowing jobs gains, the Fed seems to be stepping closer to a rate hike. At the recent IMF meeting, members worried more vocally about protectionism and entertained talk at least about the possible use or role of fiscal stimulus. And the pending remedies from these factions are, of course, 180 degrees different.
All indices except for the U.K. also are below their respective values of six months ago. The six-month values are below their respective values of six-months before that in all regions. There is a lengthy period of underperformance depicted here.
In addition, we can evaluate the various countries and regions by the relative standing of these OECD indicators in their historic queue or 'stack' of values since 1992. On that basis, the U.S., China and the U.K. all are the weakest with readings clustered at or below their respective lower 20th percentile when ranked in a queue of historic data. Japan is in its lower 31st percentile; the whole of the OECD stands in its 35th percentile, while the EMU manages an above-median 56th percentile standing.
For the EMU, the readings stand above the 100 mark for all of the early EMU members except Germany and Ireland. Readings are below their respective six-month ago readings for the whole of EMU, France, Greece, Ireland, Italy and Spain. That underperforming group includes three of the four largest EMU economies.
Europe's growth remains weak although the bit of 'good news' today was that German exports in August jumped by 5.3% month-to-month, an outsized gain that was last exceeded in May 2010. But in that May report the rise followed a 3.2% drop in April and came during a period of real turbulence. This year the August gain came after a drop of 2.6% in July and a series of nine months in which exports fell in five of them. Nominal German exports are up by more month-to-month than they are year-over-year (4.9%). Meanwhile, real German export-order growth is quite firm and steadying at around a relatively solid 6% pace. Still, the August monthly export gain is coming off such a weak month that the rise is much less impressive than it seems. To provide some perspective, two-month export growth is only the highest since March of this year.
At the recent IMF meetings, world financial ministers met to discuss issues. They displayed concern about growing protectionism. It is unclear if any nations are prepared to take any concrete steps to affect global growth as a result of this meeting or the expression of these concerns. China came under attack for its overproduction and on allegations of dumping (selling below cost). The global economy is clearly struggling. It is stuck in their low gear as the LEIs make clear and as the position of this month's indices in their historic ranking underscores. In the end, here are questions whether anyone is prepared to do anything about it besides provide a eulogy for growth.