- Weekly: **Unemployment Initial Claims Data have been revised**
- US: Housing Starts by State and Region (Feb)
- CPB World Trade Monitor (Jan)
- CPB World Trade Monitor (Jan)
- France: Registered Unemployed & Job Vacancies (Feb)
- US: Household Employment for States and Regions (Feb)
- US: Wholesale Trade Revisions, Advance Durable Goods (Feb)
- Manufacturing Survey - Markit US (Flash - Mar), Composite Survey - US (Flash - Mar), Services Survey - US (Flash - Mar)
- more updates...
Economy in Brief
Correction to Unemployment Insurance Weekly Claims
The Department of Labor has issued a correction to yesterday's annual revision to seasonally adjusted weekly unemployment claims...
EMU PMIs Are Off to the Races...Farewell Mediocrity?
The PMI rankings for the manufacturing and service sector PMIs in the EMU are suddenly off the chart...
U.S. New Home Sales Improve While Prices Decline
Sales of new single-family homes increased 6.1% (12.8% y/y) during February to 592,000 units (AR)...
Kansas City Federal Reserve Factory Index Strengthens; Expectations Surge
The Kansas City Fed reported that its index of regional manufacturing sector business activity increased to 20 during March...
U.S. Initial Unemployment Insurance Claims Rise
Initial claims for unemployment insurance increased to 258,000 (-3.0% y/y) during the week ended March 18...
U.K. Retail Looks Less Bulletproof
For the most part, the assessments embodied in the March survey from the UK's CBI are being taken as being upbeat...
by Robert Brusca February 22, 2017
My prevarication in the face this quite overwhelming chart has to do with the definition of WHAT inflation really is. It is two things that give us pause in assessing true inflation at a time like this. First of all, inflation is about THE price level which means the total price level. Second, it is about a continuing rise in prices.
Reason for prevarication or not?
The problem that these aspects of inflation introduce is suggested by the table below that shows the progression of inflation as measured by the core HICP (HICP excluding select food and energy groups). Use of the core measure violates the notion of looking at the whole price level. But since the core shows little inflation acceleration, it raises the question about what in the headline represents price increases that are now and will continue to be 'ongoing.' What we have here is a debate about the issues of inflation being ongoing versus one of looking at the broadest price gauge or not.
The OPEC factor
Right now inflation is being boosted by ratcheting oil prices under the 'control' of an OPEC cartel (and friends) of suspect uniformity of purpose. While OPEC would like higher oil prices, each member must sacrifice some output to create scarcity to pressure prices higher. So there is a cost to this action. Moreover, as oil prices rise, that opens the door for the oil-shale and other 'higher-cost' producers especially in the U.S. to put their higher cost production oil back to market and that has been in progress as the (drilling) rig count in the U.S. has been steadily rising.
A policy that undermines itself: breaking bad
From this discussion, one thing to understand is that the more successful OPEC is in raising prices higher the more that a high price generates a countervailing flow of supply to undercut the OPEC objective of a higher price. That output, output that is piggybacking on OPEC austerity, may require further 'OPEC and friends' production cutbacks (since not all oil producers are 'friends'). In fact, as prices get higher, history shows that OPEC members have a habit of falling off the wagon of austerity to reap the dual joys of higher output and higher prices. That sort of thing is, of course, temporary as breaking ranks on output austerity (breaking bad we could call it) will eventually bring excessive oil flows to market and cause prices to soften or to crash.
The core rate as a diagnostic not as a target
The core inflation measure serves to remind us that rising oil prices are only transitory, lifting the price level once and shifting up the relative price of oil and not really creating inflation. For oil price increases to become inflation, other things have to happen. The central bank has to accommodate the rise in prices. Inflation expectations must embrace the notion that the rise in relative oil prices will alter inflation, then that rise could become a broader problem. The core rate is a kind of diagnostic for that. And for now, there is no reason to believe that oil is stoking inflation expectations. We do not see that in the core pace or in investor/consumer surveys.
OPEC's limited ambitions
As the oil pass-through to the price level is creating the appearance of inflation, the core shows little evidence of oil pass-through into other prices. On top of that, we have reason to be skeptical of OPEC's ultimate success and reason to see OPEC in any event with some limited ambition for what level it seeks as the right one for oil's price. OPEC does not want oil prices to rise indefinitely, at least not the Saudis who have long-term oil reserves. The Saudis are the ones making the largest sacrifice to get prices higher now. Saudi Arabia has oil for the long term and does not want energy prices so high that alternative fuels are too rapidly developed. But they have already stumbled over one such trip wire with oil-shale and tertiary production in the U.S. after letting prices soar to over $100 per barrel. That was a mistake. So we have every reason to look for OPEC ambitions to be limited and to view the headline inflation bulge as a temporary spike and not as lasting inflation in progress.
Oil stocks are still bloated
Global demand is still weak and our weekly anecdotal evidence tells us that oil stockpiles are still quite full. So far the cartel seems to have done little to make inroads to erode the oversupply as evidenced by oil stockpiles that are simply too high and much higher than what is normal.
The core evidence
While the hike in oil prices and the impact on the headline inflation is relatively new, core inflation shows little sign of budging. In the EMU, the core HICP is seeing its seasonally adjusted annualized rate of inflation (SAAR) over three months as higher than its six-month rate by only 0.3% points. Its six-month rate (SAAR) is actually the same as its 12-month rate. And its 12-month rate (SAAR) is lower by 0.1% point than it was one year ago. This is not what inflation should look like. Clearly inflation is totally a reflection of the food and energy components of the HICP making it seem less likely that what we are seeing is real inflation (of the sort that will last). This diagnosis classifies the current price-push as relative price inflation, the kind that hits the headline and pushes up the price level 'once and for all' and then has little impact on other prices in the system.
That is how the ECB is treating this surge in the headline. And for now, this approach seems to have strong merits. As a double check, we also look in the data in the second table the core inflation trends in the longest-standing EMU member countries. We find that over three months compared to six months, there is some inflation pick up. But that over six months compared to 12 months, inflation is mostly lower, not higher. And the 12-month pace compared to the 12-month pace of one year earlier finds that inflation is falling in more EMU member countries that it is rising.
Not inflation /no sustainable
This is not what true inflation should look like. If inflation is in gear, it should be manifest in most prices. But inflation is not in gear. And for all these reason we explained above, it is not likely to be sustained by the actions of the OPEC cartel. That is true for two reasons: (1) ever higher oil prices are not the cartels objective as well as, (2) because it is possible that the cartel will prove unstable and will be unable to achieve its more modest goal.
For now policy can treat this as a no-inflation situation. However, with the headline streaking, it is something that will have to be carefully watched. Some pick up in the core is still to be expected, however, and that is just to get inflation a bit closer to its 'a bit less than 2% goal.' As it is, EMU core inflation is still running at a pace below 1%. Among the 12 early EMU members in the table, the 12-month price rise is below 1% in seven of them. It is at or above 1.5% in only two of them (Belgium and Austria). Mario Draghi has his eye on these metrics as he chooses to bide his time and extend accommodative polices in the EMU. But other more critical eyes are also watching and just because core inflation is so well behaved do not expect all Europeans to finds that as the salve for their pinched inflation-wary nerves. The disagreements about how to act and how to deal with this rogue increase in headline inflation rate remains a contentious matter among ECB council members as well as among FOMC members an ocean's breadth away. Do not expect economists to agree on something as vital as this that gets to the very core of the doctrine of how to run monetary policy.