Haver’s data services are provided through the DLX platform; delivering tools for data management, visualization, modeling and publishing. DLX is designed to increase productivity and integrates with Excel, PowerPoint, and major statistical software packages; MatLab, R, Python, SAS, E-views and Stata. DLX component application DLXVG3 offers precision graphics, publishing, analytic tools, and easy navigation for all Haver databases.

icon-chart.png

Chart and compare multiple data series with accompanying data table of values

Advanced functions (growth rates, moving averages, aggregation, seasonal adjustment)

Analytical tools (cycle charts, scatterplots, trend lines, and recession shading)

Complete graph customization (axis scaling, sizing, formatting, styles)

Excel and PowerPoint direct export and complete integration (dynamic spreadsheets and presentations update on a click)

DLXVG3

icon-db.png

DLX Add-ins for all versions of Excel provide instant data updates of entire workbooks

Use DLXVG3 to locate data series codes from within any file, easily creating new spreadsheets for analysis

Edit date ranges, archive data, apply functions

Excel Spreadsheet Add-ins

icon-time.png

Haver offers timely, accurate, and professionally supported data via an update service, meeting the strictest demands of the institutional research community

AutoUpdate provides fast and reliable data updates within seconds of source releases

Timer service runs continuously on an hourly basis when DLX is running

Manual updates offer clients the independence to update data retrievals on any desired schedule

All database updates retrieve only the data series that have changed and send only the data points that have been updated; including revisions

Timely Updates

DLX software tools to convert data into many different formats needed for diverse analytical frameworks

Haver supports a DLX API permitting clients to leverage and build processes with DLX data

Database Compatibility

products-dlx.svg

Data Link Express

Platform Independent site delivering DLX Databases across any workstation or device.

products-haverview.svg

HaverView

[Matlab](http://matlab.com) by The MathWorks lets you access, visualize, and analyze historic time-series data to identify patterns or uncover complex relationships. From within a single environment you can:

- Access data from multiple sources including files, spreadsheets, databases, data providers, and the Web
- Store data in financial time-series objects to simplify data management, data transformation, missing-data handling, and date-math calculations
- Perform technical analysis with moving averages, oscillators, stochastics, and indices
- Create custom analysis routines and visualizations or animations to capture, present, and share your analysis processes and discoveries
- Customize your analysis environment with advanced functionality from signal processing, statistics, or econometrics

products-matlab.svg

MATLAB

[Stata Data Analysis and Statistical Software](https://www.stata.com) by StataCorp LP is an integrated statistical package designed for researchers of all disciplines. It provides the ability to do data analysis, data management and graphics and has features such as multiple imputation, factor variables, GMM, competing-risks regression, state-space modeling, predictive margins, and more.

products-stata.svg

Stata

[SAS](https://www.sas.com) provides an integrated environment for predictive and descriptive modeling, data mining, text analytics, forecasting, optimization, simulation, experimental design and more. From predictive analytics to model deployment and process optimization, SAS provides a range of techniques and processes for the collection, classification, analysis and interpretation of data to reveal patterns, anomalies, key variables and relationships, leading ultimately to new insights and better answers faster.

[SASEHAVR](http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/etsug/67525/HTML/default/viewer.htm#etsug_sasehavr_gettingstarted01.htm) is a seamless interface between Haver and SAS data processing that enables SAS users to read economic and financial time series data that reside in a Haver Analytics DLX (Data Link Express) database. [SASEHAVR](http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/etsug/67525/HTML/default/viewer.htm#etsug_sasehavr_gettingstarted01.htm) requires both SAS/ETS and Base SAS Software.

products-sas.svg

[RATS (Regression Analysis of Time Series) Econometric Software](https://estima.com) by Estima is a leading econometrics and time-series analysis software package. It provides ability to do linear and non-linear least squares, forecasting, SUR and ARIMA models and in addition, supports advanced techniques such as GMM, ARCH and GARCH models, state space models, and more.

products-rats.svg

RATS

Session 1: Bootcamp Part 1

Visualization with GGPlot2 and data analysis

Session 2: Bootcamp Part 2

Session 3: Univariate Models Part 1

Session 4: Univariate Models Part 2

Session 5: Vector Autoregressions

Session 6: Cointegration and error-correction models

A popular open source option for statistical computing and graphics that is available on many UNIX platforms, Windows and MacOS

Estimating, evaluating, and forecasting ARIMA models

Understanding the concept of non-stationarity and testing for unit roots

Estimating autoregressions, granger causality tests, and impulse response functions

Understanding the concept of cointegration and testing using the Enger-Granger test

Estimating and forecasting with vector error correction models

products-r.svg

Teaches econometrics and forecasting at the University of Colorado Denver. He has over 15 years of econometric experience in both the private and public sector.

Daniel L. Jerrett, Ph.D.

Abdel M. Zellou, Ph.D.

Bootcamp and Econometric Tools 1 & 2

Econometrics Training: Applied Time Series in R

Session 5: Multivariate Models Part 1

Session 6: Multivariate Models Part 2

Haver partners with SmartMacro Labs to offer a two week immersive online course introducing participants to the power of the Python programming language. This applied hands-on training develops statistical economics skills with a concentration on economics and finance.

Gain proficiency in building modern time-series models in Python through real-world applications. Designed for professionals in both the public and private sector, the course does not require prior experience, assuming only that participants have a basic understanding of regression and statistical concepts.

Proficiency working in Jupyter notebooks and the Python environment

products-python.svg

Remote Training: Applied Time Series in Python

Even with strong capex, US nonfinancial corporations are generating more cash than they are investing

Winnie Tapasanun

260921A55.jpg

260921B55.jpg

The Chicago Fed National Activity Index (CFNAI) fell to -0.04 in August from an upwardly revised +0.08 in July (-0.08 initially) and a downwardly revised -0.01 in June (+0.06 previously), today’s report from the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago showed, indicating that economic activity was below its historical trend for the third time in four months in August after slightly above the historical trend in July. The latest CFNAI was above a low of -0.50 in October 2025 and a reading of -0.36 in August 2025 but below a high of +0.39 in February 2025.

The index's three-month moving average (CFNAI-MA3), which smooths out the m/m volatility in the index, increased to +0.01 in August from an upwardly revised -0.01 in July (-0.04 initially), registering the second positive reading in three months. It was above a low of -0.39 in October 2025 and -0.14 in August 2025 but below a recent high of +0.08 in April. The CFNAI-MA3 is expressed in standard deviation units from zero (with a value of zero defined as trend real GDP growth). Research at the Chicago Fed indicates that an average reading of -0.70 or below is consistent with the economy being in a recession. Thus, the August reading suggested that the U.S. economy is not currently in a recession.

The August reading reflected m/m declines in two of the four CFNAI key components and one negative contribution. The contribution of the Production & Income index to the CFNAI decreased to -0.07 in August, the lowest reading since January, from a neutral value (0.00) in July and June; it was below a high of +0.37 in February 2025 but above -0.13 in August 2025 and a low of -0.61 in January 2024. The contribution of the Sales, Orders & Inventories index fell to a neutral 0.00 in August, matching the lowest level since May, from +0.15 in July; it was below a high of +0.16 in March 2025 but above -0.08 in August 2025 and a low of -0.20 in April 2025. The Employment, Unemployment & Hours index contributed +0.01 in August, the highest reading since April, up from -0.01 in July; it was above a low of -0.13 in February 2026 and -0.12 in August 2025 but below a high of +0.05 in January 2026. The contribution of the Personal Consumption & Housing index rose to +0.01 in August, the second positive reading in three months, from -0.06 in July; it was above -0.03 in August 2025 and a low of -0.14 in January 2025 but below a high of +0.10 in March 2025.

The CFNAI Diffusion Index—which measures the breadth of change in the component series and is also a three-month moving average—slipped to +0.02 in August, the sixth consecutive positive reading, from a downwardly revised +0.04 in July (+0.05 initially). A string of negative readings was posted during the March 2023 to February 2026 period. A reading of zero indicates that all of the indicators are growing at their long-term average. The August reading was above a low of -0.56 in October 2025 and -0.18 in August 2025 but below a high of +0.15 in September 2022.

The CFNAI is a weighted average of 85 indicators of national economic activity. It is constructed to have an average value of zero and a standard deviation of one. Since economic activity tends toward trend growth rate over time, a positive index reading corresponds to growth above trend and a negative index reading corresponds to growth below trend.

These figures are available in Haver's **SURVEYS** database.

- CFNAI down to -0.04 in Aug., negative for the third time in four mths.
- Two of four CFNAI components down m/m; one makes a negative contribution.
- CFNAI-MA3 up to +0.01, second positive reading in three mths.; above -0.70 (recession signal).
- CFNAI Diffusion Index down to +0.02, still positive for the sixth straight mth.

Chicago Fed National Activity Index Negative in August After July’s Upwardly Revised Positive Level

Robert Brusca

260921E.jpg

The exhibits in this report feature a graph based on the RICS survey showing U.K. sales expectations for the next three months versus the last three months, while tabular data show Nationwide housing prices and how they are moving month-to-month as well as year-over-year. In addition, the table provides the recent GfK survey results on consumer confidence in the U.K. and presents rankings of housing prices and consumer confidence.

These statistics paint a somewhat mixed picture of the U.K. economy although clearly they paint a picture of an economy that is not firing on all cylinders. The ranking on year-over-year house price changes in the Nationwide survey and the ranking for the GfK consumer confidence index give highly similar relative signals, with both of them around the 30th to 40th percentiles in their historic queues of data extending back to 1992.

Housing prices are still advancing more slowly than they did in previous years. While consumer confidence is still low, it has shown improvement in recent months, and the last two readings showed year-over-year improvement in the monthly data. The RICS chart on the pace of sales shows some improvement, if not yet outright gains. Still, housing conditions are weak, and the question of whether they are limping back into the black, whether prices are holding on for small gains, or whether there is a more solid recovery taking place remain unanswered. So far, at least, it does not look like backsliding.

260921.jpg

The Bank of England just met last week. Although the inflation background was poor and the inflation numbers before the BOE meeting were worse than expected, the bank did not move to hike interest rates. In part, the realization is that an interest-rate hike is not going to solve the international problem of high and rising energy prices, but they are still a reality that the central bank has to deal with. The central bank will want to take steps to head off knock-on effects even if it can't push back on the reason that prices are rising. One reason for hesitancy among Bank of England Monetary Policy Committee members is that, so far, they have not seen evidence that oil price effects are broadly being spread through the system, and there's concern about the fragility of the economy. The BOE is being wary about taking steps to stop the spread of inflation that isn't occurring. However, at some point, it may be forced to deal with spreading inflation even if the economy is not on solid footing.

These are the risks that the central bank is dealing with and the sorts of conditions, perceptions, and subtleties that are the bread and butter of monetary policy. Monetary policy is not simply a matter of asking: What's growth? What's inflation? What's the unemployment rate? And here's the solution. Many judgments need to be drawn about these variables and more. It's a central bank’s job to make the best decisions that it possibly can to generate the best of economic environments so that the economy can deliver its top level of performance. The decision made by the Bank of England this week, which you can understand by looking at the 200-word essays made by MPC members after the bank’s meeting, gives you real insight into the conditions that policymakers are dealing with and the difference among monetary policy committee members about how to handle these complexities. Whether the bank needs to deal with the inflation problem now or whether it can kick the can down the road and deal with it later or hope it will not have to deal with it at all, these are the options for action and inaction.

United Kingdom

U.K. Housing Surveys and Consumer Sentiment Support the View of Weak Growth

Tian Yong Woon

This week, we assess whether Asia is really moving away from the dollar by examining its US asset holdings, reserves, gold purchases and trade settlement. We then turn to Japan’s monetary normalisation. Asia’s presence in US portfolio markets has declined since the early 2010s (chart 1). Japan's share of foreign holdings of US long-term securities has halved, and mainland China's has fallen further still. The euro area and the UK have absorbed most of that ground. Even so, Japan is still the largest foreign holder of Treasuries, and a reshuffling among creditors need not mean an exit from dollar assets. Official reserves tell a similar story (chart 2). The dollar's share is down close to 6 percentage points over eight years, to 57.1%, yet no single currency has picked up all of it. The residual group of other currencies gained most, which points to diversification rather than substitution. Gold fits that reading (chart 3), with Singapore, India, Thailand and China all adding heavily in volume terms. Reserve growth alone may explain part of the rise. Trade settlement has moved least of all (chart 4). South Korea still settles about 84% of exports and 79% of imports in dollars, and broader studies point the same way. Moving to Japan, the central bank raised its policy rate to 1.25% last week, with Governor Ueda striking a hawkish note (chart 5). The spread to Fed, ECB and Bank of England policy rates has narrowed to about 2 percentage points. The yen, meanwhile, has rebounded from a record low after coordinated intervention, while the 10-year JGB yield has touched 3% (chart 6).

**Gold, the US, and the US dollar**
Asia's footprint in US portfolio markets has thinned considerably since the early 2010s (chart 1). Japan's share of overall foreign holdings of US long-term securities has roughly halved, from a peak near 14.5% in 2012 to about 8% in July 2026. Mainland China's slide is starker, from 13.4% at the start of 2012 to roughly 3%. The euro area has absorbed most of that ground, rising from about 19% to around 26%, while the UK sits at a record 10.6%. Japan nonetheless remains the largest foreign holder of Treasuries at USD 1.1tn, while China's holdings have slipped to USD 618bn, the lowest since September 2008. A reshuffling among creditors is not always the same as an exit from dollar assets. Japan also remains Asia's largest holder on both sides of the ledger, accounting for about 8.6% of US holdings of foreign securities.

260921T1.gif

The de-dollarisation debate has a second front in the currency composition of official reserves (chart 2). The dollar's share has fallen by close to 6 percentage points over the past eight years, to 57.1% in the first quarter of 2026. The more revealing question is where that share went. No single currency has picked up all of it. The yen gained less than 1 percentage point, the Canadian dollar and the renminbi around half a point each, while the euro barely moved. The largest beneficiary was the residual group of other currencies, up some 3.7 points. That looks like diversification rather than a search for one alternative, and the renminbi's 2.0% share underlines the point.

260921T2.jpg

The same message shows up in gold, where volumes rather than values are the cleaner measure (chart 3). In volume terms, Singapore has added more than 60% to its holdings over the past eight years. India and Thailand are up by more than half, and China by close to 30%. Japan, Indonesia and Malaysia have made smaller additions, while the Philippines has cut its stock by about a third over two major bouts. Exceptions aside, and given the seemingly concerted accumulation of gold among Asian central banks, diversification is one reading. A simpler explanation, which may hold at the same time, is that reserves have grown overall, and gold holdings have had to rise in proportion.

260921T3.jpg

**South Korea and trade settlement**
Holdings are only part of the picture. Trade settlement, dollar funding and hedging practice matter just as much, and they shift far more slowly. South Korea, one of Asia's most important trade nodes, still settles about 84% of its exports and 79% of its imports in dollars (chart 4). The export share has barely budged in a decade. The import share has drifted down from a 2022 peak near 83%, but the decline is muted and remains within its ten-year range. South Korea is only one case, though broader work, including recent IMF studies, points the same way. The dollar's continued dominance in trade settlement does not chime with the de-dollarisation narrative.

260921T4.jpg

**Japan**
Turning to Japan, the central bank (BoJ) lifted its policy rate by 25 basis points to 1.25% last week (chart 5). Two details stand out. The vote was split 7 to 2, with Asada and Sato, both appointed this year, preferring to hold at 1%. Governor Ueda also struck a hawkish note. He said the BoJ should act pre-emptively rather than be forced into rapid hikes later. He added that the price trend is close to the bank's 2% target, and that authorities must ensure inflation does not overshoot. Even so, Japan remains the outlier among major central banks, though less of one than before. The gap to the average policy rate of the Fed, the ECB and the Bank of England is about 2 percentage points. That gap stood near 5 points in early 2024. The average is rising again, with the Fed and the ECB both tightening this month.

260921T5.jpg

Turning to the yen, the currency's recent rebound has been abrupt (chart 6). On a trade-weighted basis, it weakened at the end of July to a record low, based Haver’s proprietary calculations. It has since regained about 4% to 5% and now sits closer to its end-2025 level. The trigger was rare coordinated intervention by Tokyo and Washington, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent backing the effort to correct what he termed a substantial undervaluation. Japanese authorities reportedly spent a record JPY 15.4tn across July and August. Yields have carried part of the load. The 10-year JGB yield touched 3% at the start of September, a level last seen in 1996, having begun the year near 2.1%. The climb is part of a global repricing driven by energy-led inflation and fiscal supply, with Takaichi's spending plans adding a domestic premium. The yen slipped again after the BoJ decision, a reminder that intervention buys time rather than a trend.

260921T6.jpg

Asia

Economic Letter from Asia: Held in Reserve

260918R23.jpg

260918S23.jpg

Industrial production (IP) was virtually unchanged m/m in August after rises of 0.2% in July (unrevised) and 0.2% in June (+0.3% previously), data from the Federal Reserve Board showed, indicating industrial activity remained on an upward trend despite little change in the latest month. A 0.3% m/m August increase had been expected in the Action Economics Forecast Survey. The year-on-year growth rate accelerated to 1.4% in August, the highest since May, from 1.1% in July (0.8% in August 2025). The August IP index at 103.1 was 3.8% above a low of 99.3 in November 2024 and 3.9% above a low of 99.2 in January 2024.

By **industry groups**, manufacturing production decreased 0.3% (+0.9% y/y) in August, the first m/m decline since December, after increases of 0.2% in July (unrevised) and 0.1% in June (+0.3% previously). Durable goods production fell 0.5% (+3.3% y/y) in August, down for the first time since November 2025, following a 0.6% rise in July. Within durables, almost all categories fell m/m in August, led by drops of 1.4% (-2.8% y/y) in furniture & related products and 1.4% (+0.7% y/y) in miscellaneous durable goods, followed by declines of 1.2% (+4.2% y/y) in aerospace & miscellaneous transportation equipment, 1.2% (-1.0% y/y) in motor vehicles & parts, 1.1% (+2.8% y/y) in nonmetallic mineral products, 0.5% (+8.7% y/y) in computer & electronic products, 0.3% (+0.5% y/y) in primary metals, and 0.1% (+3.6% y/y) in fabricated metal products. Notably, aircraft & parts production slid 1.4% (+7.7% y/y), the first m/m slide since January, after a 1.7% July gain. To the upside, durable goods categories for machinery (+0.5%; +6.3% y/y) and wood products (+0.2%; -0.7% y/y) posted m/m output gains in August. Durable goods for electrical equipment, appliances & components held steady m/m (+5.5% y/y) following a 0.4% July rebound.

Nondurable goods production was essentially unchanged m/m (-1.5% y/y) in August following a 0.4% decrease in July and a 0.4% rebound in June. The August flat reading reflected m/m falls of 1.0% (-4.8% y/y) in printing & related support activities, 0.9% (+0.8% y/y) in plastics & rubber products, 0.7% (+0.8% y/y) in petroleum & coal products, and 0.2% (-2.9% y/y) in paper. Meanwhile, nondurable goods categories for apparel & leather goods (+2.1%; +3.6% y/y), textiles & product mills (+1.3%; -0.1% y/y), and food, beverages & tobacco (+0.3%; -1.2% y/y) registered m/m output gains in August; output for chemicals held steady m/m (-2.6% y/y) following a 0.3% July decline.

Utilities output advanced 1.8% (6.2% y/y) in August on top of a 0.5% increase in July (unrevised), reflecting a 2.1% rise (7.0% y/y) in electric utilities output and a 0.5% decrease (+0.8% y/y) in natural gas utilities output. Mining activity edged up 0.1% (0.3% y/y) after a 0.1% July uptick (+0.2% initially). The utilities and mining series posted the third consecutive m/m gain and the fourth in five months, while recording May flat readings.

By **market groups**, materials production grew 0.2% (1.5% y/y) in August, the fourth m/m gain in five months, adding to a 0.3% rise in July. Consumer goods output ticked up 0.1% (-1.1% y/y) following a 0.3% July decrease, reflecting a 0.5% decline (-3.7% y/y) in durable consumer goods and a 0.3% increase (-0.4% y/y) in nondurable consumer goods. In contrast, construction supplies production fell 0.7% (+1.3% y/y), the first m/m fall since April, after a 0.5% July gain. Business equipment output slid 0.5% (+7.1% y/y) in August, the first m/m drop since October 2025, following a 1.0% July rise. 

In **special classifications**, factory output of selected high-tech industries was virtually unchanged m/m (+12.5% y/y) in August after four straight m/m gains, including a 1.3% increase in July. Manufacturing production excluding selected high-tech industries fell 0.3% (+0.5% y/y) in August, the first m/m decline since January, after a 0.1% increase in July. Manufacturing production excluding selected high-tech and motor vehicles & parts slipped 0.2% (+0.7% y/y), down for the first time since May, reversing a 0.2% July gain.

Capacity utilization was at 76.3% in August, the highest since July 2025, unchanged from July (unrevised). The Action Economics Forecast Survey forecasted 76.4%. The August reading was 3.1 percentage points below its long-run (1972–2025) average. Manufacturing capacity utilization fell to 75.7% in August, the lowest since March, from 76.0% in July (unrevised). The August rate was 2.5 percentage points below its long-run average.

Industrial production and capacity data are in Haver’s **USECON** database. Additional detail on production and capacity utilization can be found in the **IP** database. The expectations figures come from the **AS1REPNA** database.

260918T23.jpg

260918U23.jpg

- August IP 0.0% (+1.4% y/y) after four consecutive m/m increases, remaining on an upward trend.
- Manufacturing -0.3% (+0.9% y/y), first m/m decline since Dec., w/ durables -0.5% and nondurables 0.0%.
- Selected high-tech 0.0% after four straight m/m rises; motor vehicles -1.2%, second successive m/m drop.
- Utilities +1.8% (+6.2% y/y), fourth rise in five mths., led by a 2.1% gain in electric utilities output.
- Mining +0.1% (+0.3% y/y), up for the fourth time in five mths.
- Key categories in market groups post mixed results.
- Capacity utilization steady at 76.3%, highest since July ’25; mfg. capacity utilization down to 75.7%, lowest since March.

U.S. Industrial Production Flat in August; Manufacturing IP Down

260918E.jpg

German inflation in August saw the headline pop while core remained copacetic. The difference between the two trends is like night and day.

**Headline PPI**
Germany’s PPI spurted for the second consecutive month, rising by 1.2% in both July and August. These jumps followed a drop of 0.3% in June. The German headline PPI is up by 4.6% over 12 months, up by 12.5% at an annual rate over six months, and up at an 8.3% annual rate over three months. Those gains are largely driven by energy trends.

**The core is a different story**
The PPI excluding energy in August gained by 0.2%, the same as in July, after a 0.3% rise in June. Sequentially, the ex-energy PPI rose 3.1% (SAAR) over 12 months, at a 5.0% annual rate over six months, and at a 3.3% annual rate over three months. That’s still excessive, but much less worrisome.

**Sector stories**
The sectors, using unfortunately NSA data, show consumer prices moving lower over three months, with very mild, near-target overshooting for investment goods, while intermediate goods bear the burden of pressure. These observations are for the three-month annualized growth rates but apply equally to the 12-month growth rates.

**The CPI for reference**
German CPI inflation, included in the table as a reference, shows roughly the same patterns as the PPI, with the headline growing in excess of the ECB’s EMU-wide target pace, overshooting by about a percentage point, while the CPI ex-energy skims along at a nearly acceptable pace of overshoot that ranges from 2.2% to 2.5% over three months, six months, and 12 months.

**Inflation forces present but surprisingly contained**
Clearly, inflationary pressures are present in Germany and just as clearly, they are not spreading but have done their damage by the weight of energy in each sector. This does not mean there will not be progression or knock-on effects, just that, so far, they have not appeared. And part of this is because of ongoing economic weakness in Germany.

**QTD**
Quarter to date (QTD), the German headline two months into Q3 has risen at an 8.3% annual rate as the ex-energy PPI runs at a pace of 4%. Both are too hot. Sector inflation rates on NSA data are acceptable except for intermediate goods where the pace rises to 5.3% in the quarter (energy, again). The CPI on a quarterly basis also generates a 3.2% headline gain against a core pace of just 2.2%.

260918.jpg

**The rocky road ahead**
Brent oil prices have been somewhat wild recently, with action in the Strait of Hormuz on a volatile path. The Saudis just announced that they would be shipping no oil to Europe over the next few months as they have refinery repairs to conduct. The Houthis and the Saudis are going at it again. It’s hard to establish an outlook with this much geopolitical chaos. Best to just go day by day. My reading of the war is that the U.S. blockade has become more effective and is putting Iran under strain. Stories report that Iranian oil shipments to China have been mostly stopped. Maybe the U.S. approach finally has teeth. Will it work, or will it cause a counterattack by a trapped and pressured regime? Is a real truce between these enemies who can’t trust one another even possible? With that admitted, it is hard to see a stable end-game.

Germany

German PPI Shows Pressure, But It’s Limited

Andrew Cates

**From easing to tightening**
Market expectations concerning Fed policy have turned completely since January. Contracts covering December 2026 and the first half of 2027 then implied a federal funds rate a little above 3 per cent, comfortably below the rate the Fed was actually running, and an easing cycle was the base case. That gap closed in March and has since inverted, with the move accelerating over the past fortnight. Energy is the immediate cause. The conflict with Iran has kept crude above $100 a barrel, and August’s inflation report showed the pass-through into core prices that policymakers had hoped to avoid. This week’s quarter-point increase was accordingly almost fully priced beforehand and settled little on its own. The framing around it was another matter. Sixteen of the eighteen participants who submitted projections expect at least one further increase this year, four of them two, and the median path is held at around 4.1 per cent through the end of next year with no cuts at all. Chair Warsh’s insistence on a timelier return to target was taken as ruling out an early reversal, and equities gave up their initial gains as he spoke. Futures now sit above the committee’s own path by the middle of 2027, and the long end has followed rather than steadied. A policy rate expected to approach 4.5 per cent alongside a ten-year yield above 5 per cent speaks to term premia as much as to the Fed.

260917Z1.jpg

**Who is paying for the boom**
The tightening is arguably not the product of corporate borrowing. The latest US financial accounts reveal that American non-financial companies ran a financing surplus of around 1 per cent of GDP in Q1, which is to say that internal cash flow more than covered their capital spending. The position has held for most of the past four years, and it stands in contrast to 2000, when the sector was running a deficit of more than 3 per cent of GDP at the peak of the last (internet-led) investment cycle. That distinction matters for how the present boom is read. Aggregates conceal distribution, and a small number of hyperscalers and data-centre developers have turned to bond and private credit markets on a scale that unsettled equity investors in recent weeks. At the level of the aggregate sector, however, the marginal claim on the US saving is coming from the US government rather than from companies.

260917Z2.jpg

**A friendlier mix, for now**
The latest September survey reveals that the Blue Chip panel has made much the same adjustment almost everywhere in recent months: growth for this year has been revised up, inflation for this year revised down. Taiwan and Korea account for the largest growth upgrades, both for the same AI-related reasons, while the United States, the euro area, Japan, the United Kingdom and India all sit in the same quadrant on a more modest scale. China alone (in our sample in the chart below) has seen neither forecast moved. The combination reads well, but it needs qualifying. With a fixed target year this far advanced, most of the 2026 inflation number is already determined by outturns, so marking it down is largely a verdict on the first half of the year rather than on the energy shock now working through.

260917Z3.jpg

**The UK’s quiet labour market**
The UK labour market is no longer adding much to inflation pressure. Private-sector regular pay is growing at around 3 per cent, the slowest rate since 2020 and below its average in the years before the pandemic. Vacancies have fallen to just over 700,000, the lowest outside the pandemic period since 2014, and payrolled employment declined again in August, leaving it around 145,000 lower than a year earlier. Unemployment, at 4.9 per cent, is up on the year. Smaller firms continue to tell the official vacancy survey that they are holding back from recruitment because of labour costs. None of this settles the Bank of England's decision later this week, since the inflation problem is arriving from outside rather than from wages.

260917Z4.jpg

**China is producing strongly but spending weakly**
China's August data extended a familiar divergence. Industrial output accelerated 5.2% y/y in August after 4.5% in July, beating expectations despite four typhoons disrupting activity along the east coast. Retail sales, in contrast, grew by just 0.4%. Fixed investment in the first eight months was more than 7 per cent lower than a year earlier, a deeper contraction than through July, and investment in real estate development fell by close to a fifth. The weakness is no longer confined to property: total fixed investment turned negative last year and the pace of decline has steepened since, with private investment contracting while state-owned enterprises hold the total up. For the rest of the world the arithmetic is straightforward. An economy producing strongly and consuming weakly exports the difference, and potentially exports disinflation with it. That makes China a partial offset to the energy shock elsewhere, and raises the odds of further domestic stimulus in the immediate weeks ahead.

260917Z5.jpg

**Ten days in September**
Korean customs data offer the earliest and cleanest reading on global technology demand, and the first ten days of September produced some of the largest numbers on record. Semiconductor shipments were worth $16.5 billion in that window, close to three and a half times their value a year earlier, and accounted for 47 per cent of all Korean exports. Total exports rose by more than 80 per cent, with shipments to China doubling and those to the United States more than doubling. This is the phenomenon behind the Taiwanese and Korean forecast upgrades noted above, and it is the physical counterpart of the capital spending recorded in the American accounts. It also concentrates risk. Close to half the export earnings of a major economy now rest on a single investment theme, financed in part by borrowing whose terms are set in the market that has repriced in recent weeks.

260917Z6.jpg

The cost of energy and the cost of money set the tone this week. Brent crude held above $100 a barrel with a major Saudi pipeline still offline, and the Federal Reserve raised the federal funds rate by a quarter point, its first increase since 2023. The projections accompanying the decision mattered more than the decision itself, and futures have since priced a policy rate by the middle of 2027 above anything the committee has pencilled in, with the ten-year Treasury yield through 5 per cent for the first time since 2007 (chart 1). But the source of that tightening is worth dwelling on, because American companies are not competing for credit. The non-financial corporate sector is generating more cash than it spends, and has been for most of the past four years (chart 2). Forecasters have meanwhile spent the summer nudging growth forecasts up and inflation forecasts down for this year, with Taiwan and Korea marked up by some distance the most (chart 3). Britain provided a counterpoint, with pay growth and vacancies both back at or below pre-pandemic norms ahead of the Bank of England’s decision (chart 4). China’s August figures showed industrial output accelerating while investment contracted more deeply (chart 5). And Korean customs data for the first ten days of September gave yet another reading of how much of world trade now runs through a single product (chart 6).

<iframe data-testid="embed-iframe" style="border-radius:12px" src="https://open.spotify.com/embed/episode/0CXbExxkHFXGr82bsfLGnF?utm_source=generator&si=9d9a6bd67da74f12" width="100%" height="152" frameBorder="0" allowfullscreen="" allow="autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; fullscreen; picture-in-picture" loading="lazy"></iframe>

Charts of the Week: The Price of Money

Michael J. Moran

260917A.jpg

260917B.jpg

Housing activity has been sluggish in the past few years, with private residential construction making negative contributions to GDP growth in seven of the past 10 quarters. The constraints have been small, averaging -0.06 percentage point, but a drag nonetheless (chart, upper left). The third quarter is on track for another negative contribution, as housing starts in July and August trail the average in the prior quarter by 3.9%.

Total housing starts in August were soft, declining 2.6%. The drop occurred from an upward revised reading in July (5.7% firmer than previously believed), but the initial reading was not impressive, and the adjusted level was still in the low portion of the recent range. The drop in August pushed total starts further into the low portion of the range (the fourth lowest since the start of 2023; chart, upper right).

It is tempting to dismiss the decline in August as random volatility, as the change was dominated by a retreat in the volatile multi-family sector (off 21.7%). We have seen similar degrees of multi-family noise in other recent months (-41.4% in May and a rebound of 83.3% in June). As such, there is a good chance that September will show a pickup in multi-family starts. However, a focus on trends still suggests a soft tone in housing.

In seeking to identify housing trends, building permits, because they are less volatile, provide more insight than starts do. Single-family permits trended lower during much of 2024 and early 2025, and they have moved sideways since late last year, signaling little chance of a positive contribution to economic growth (chart, lower left). Multi-family permits drifted upward during 2025, but they have turned a corner so far this year, as shown by the six-month average in the lower right chart. The recent increase in long-term interest rates (up approximately one-half percentage point since June) leads one to worry about a softening in housing trends.

The housing starts and permits figures can be found in Haver’s **USECON** database. The expectations figure is contained in the **AS1REPNA** database.

260917C.jpg

260917D.jpg

- A drop in multi-family activity in August offset a gain in the single-family sector.
- Q3 shaping up to be another soft quarter for housing.

Housing Starts: Upward Revisions to June & July, but a Drop in August

Kathleen Stephansen, CBE

260917A0.jpg

260917B0.jpg

Initial claims for unemployment insurance dropped by 10,000 to 196,000 in the week ending September 12 from an unrevised level of 206,000 in the week ending September 5. The four-week average was 203,250 in the September 12 week, down from 206,000 in the September 5 week, also unrevised. Claims have been largely range-bound at historically low levels between 200,000 and 230,000. The Action Economics/Haver Analytics Survey looked for 206,000 claims to have been filed.

The total number of unemployment insurance beneficiaries—also known as “continuing claims”— dropped 39,000 to 1.730 million in the week ending September 5, down from 1.769 million in the week in the week ending August 29, revised from 1.774 million. The four-week moving average was 1.761 million in the September 5 week, down from 1.778 million in the August 29 week. The insured unemployment rate remained edged down to 1.1% in the September 5 week from 1.2% in the week of August 29, and the first drop since the April 25 week.

The insured unemployment rate varies greatly across individual states and territories. In the week ending August 29, the highest unemployment rates were in Massachusetts (2.03%), Puerto Rico (2.57%), and New Jersey (2.58%). The lowest rates were in South Dakota (0.21%), Florida (0.34%), Louisiana (0.34%), Alabama (0.35%), Kentucky (0.36%), North Carolina (0.37%), Arkansas (0.42%), Nebraska (0.43%), Iowa and North Dakota (both 0.44%), Tennessee (0.45%), Kansas (0.46%), Idaho (0.47%), and Wyoming (0.48%). Rates in other notable states include Texas (1.01%), Pennsylvania (1.39%), Illinois (1.41%), New York (1.72%) and California (1.78%). These state data are not seasonally adjusted.

Data on weekly unemployment claims are from the Department of Labor itself, not the Bureau of Labor Statistics. They begin in 1967 and are contained in Haver’s **WEEKLY** database and summarized monthly in **USECON**. Data for individual states are in **REGIONW** back to December 1986.

260917C0.jpg

260917D0.jpg

- New claims declined by 10,000 to 196,000 in the week of September 12.
- Continuing claims dropped by 39,000 to 1.730 million in the week ending September 5.
- The insured unemployment rate inched down to 1.1% in the week of September 5, the first drop since April 25.

U.S. Initial Unemployment Claims Dropped in the Week of September 12

**The Plumbing Tightens Again**
Euro area manufacturers reported a further lengthening of suppliers’ delivery times in this week’s flash survey, taking the index to its most stretched since the disrupted trading conditions of 2022. Dry bulk freight rates have risen in step, and the coincidence is not accidental. Neither series is signalling strong demand. Vessels diverted away from Bab el-Mandeb and the Gulf are sailing considerably further to deliver the same cargo, which absorbs tonnage, extends voyage times and tightens the freight market without any increase in the volume of goods actually being moved. Manufacturers meet the same phenomenon as delay, and respond by ordering earlier and holding more, which tightens it further. Delivery times of this kind fed producer prices with a lag of two to three quarters after 2021, and there is little reason to expect a different sequence now. The more awkward feature for firms building plans for next year is that the friction is a function of route length rather than of order books, so it will not ease simply because activity slows.

large_260924Z1.jpg

medium_260924Z1.jpg

small_260924Z1.jpg

thumbnail_260924Z1.jpg

260924Z1.jpg

**A Very Narrow Base**
Consensus forecasts for growth this year have been marked down only modestly since February, which looks surprising set against six months of disrupted energy supply. The aggregate conceals an unusual degree of dispersion. Economies at the centre of the semiconductor supply chain have been upgraded substantially, Taiwan by several percentage points and Korea by more than one, on the strength of an investment boom in artificial intelligence whose physical apparatus they build. Almost everywhere else the revisions run from flat to negative, with Germany, France, Canada and Australia absorbing the energy shock without any equivalent windfall. Strip the chip exporters out and the world number reads considerably worse. That matters for anyone using the global aggregate as an input, because this year it carries less information about the typical economy than usual, and the handful of observations doing most of the work are levered to a single investment cycle.

large_260924Z2.jpg

medium_260924Z2.jpg

small_260924Z2.jpg

thumbnail_260924Z2.jpg

260924Z2.jpg

Sources: Blue Chip Economic Indicators, WTO and Haver Analytics

**Spending the Buffer**
The world has kept itself supplied with fuel through six months of disruption by drawing on the oil it had already stored, and the scale of that drawdown has no parallel in the available record. The starting position helped, since stocks were built up rapidly through late 2025 and the conflict arrived with storage unusually full. Two things follow. Inventories are a stock rather than a flow, and can be run down only once. And the apparent mildness of the macroeconomic damage so far has been bought with a buffer that is now largely spent, which leaves the system materially less able to absorb whatever arrives next. Some caution is warranted in reading the series, since implied stock change is the residual between estimated world supply and estimated world demand and therefore collects the measurement error in both. Neither the direction nor the magnitude is easily dismissed on those grounds.

large_260924Z3.jpg

medium_260924Z3.jpg

small_260924Z3.jpg

thumbnail_260924Z3.jpg

260924Z3.jpg

Sources: US Energy Information Administration and Haver Analytics

**Three Disturbances at Once**
Central banks are usually content to look through a commodity shock, and the justification for doing so rests on an assumption that the move will reverse. What has happened since February fits that description less well than usual. Crude and coal have risen because of the Middle East. Cereals, beverages and agricultural raw materials have risen because the World Meteorological Organization put the odds of an El Niño event near ninety per cent at the beginning of June, and West Africa, Southeast Asia and eastern Australia all dry out during the warm phase. Base metals have risen because artificial intelligence and rearmament have made them contested. Three disturbances of broadly comparable size, with different origins and little correlation between them, are therefore running at the same time. That is not a commodity cycle, in which the complex rises and falls together and a policymaker can reasonably wait. It is a queue of supply failures, each arriving before the last has cleared the annual comparison, and a queue is considerably harder to distinguish from a persistent inflation problem — for the policymaker, and for the public whose expectations the policymaker is trying to anchor. Assigning each sub-index to a principal source is a judgement rather than a decomposition, but the point about correlation survives any reasonable redrawing of the categories.

large_260924Z4.jpg

medium_260924Z4.jpg

small_260924Z4.jpg

thumbnail_260924Z4.jpg

260924Z4.jpg

**Where the Strain Registers**
Labour demand is the clearest evidence so far that the shock has reached the real economy, and it has reached it selectively. Online job postings in the United States drifted lower through last year but have stabilised and turned modestly higher since the spring. In the United Kingdom and Germany they have kept falling, and the British decline has been steep enough to leave postings far below where they began 2025. The official statistics point the same way. German unemployment has been above three million for most of this year, with the Federal Employment Agency describing labour demand as weak even as fiscal policy turns sharply expansionary, while British recruiters have reported falling permanent placements for months. The divergence follows the distributional logic of an energy shock. Economies that import their energy have transferred real income to those that produce it, and firms facing higher input costs and an uncertain demand outlook adjust first by not hiring rather than by dismissing, which is why the deterioration shows up in postings well before it shows up in unemployment. Loosening of this kind would ordinarily argue for easier policy. With the inflation coming from the supply side, it has not.

large_260924Z5.jpg

medium_260924Z5.jpg

small_260924Z5.jpg

thumbnail_260924Z5.jpg

260924Z5.jpg

**France Steps Away from the Core**
The French premium over Bunds crossed one hundred basis points last week for the first time since the euro crisis of 2011 and 2012, and it now trades wider than Italy’s. Spain, once the standard measure of peripheral stress, sits at less than half the French spread, and that reordering of the currency union’s credit hierarchy is the more telling development. The proximate cause is domestic. Public debt has reached around 119 per cent of output, the deficit remains close to twice the European ceiling, and the Lecornu government is attempting a consolidation of some fifty-four billion euros through a parliament that has already censured two of its predecessors, with a draft budget due at the end of this month. With a presidential election in 2027 and no obvious centrist majority beyond it, what investors are pricing is not the arithmetic of the deficit but the political capacity to act on it. The German side of the spread is no longer still either. Bunds stand at seventeen-year highs, reflecting a borrowing programme that runs to a five-hundred-billion-euro infrastructure fund and defence spending exempted from the debt brake above one per cent of output, and German politics has itself become much less predictable.

large_260924Z6.jpg

medium_260924Z6.jpg

small_260924Z6.jpg

thumbnail_260924Z6.jpg

260924Z6.jpg

Financial markets have spent this week weighing whether this year's energy shock has passed its peak, and have changed their minds more than once. Brent slipped below $99 as Hormuz shipments were reported recovering and Gulf leaders gathered in New York, only to recover above $100 within a day. The relief in the energy market has proved neither durable nor shared by the bond market. The Federal Reserve raised rates last week for the first time in three years, the ECB has tightened alongside it and the Bank of Japan has moved again, leaving ten-year Treasury yields at levels last seen in 2007 and Bunds at seventeen-year highs. This week’s flash purchasing managers’ surveys help explain the discomfort, with European supply chains lengthening once more as dry bulk freight rates climb (chart 1). The aggregate global growth picture has nonetheless held up better than the geopolitics would imply, though the latest Blue Chip consensus survey continues to suggest that this resilience is concentrated in only a small group of semiconductor exporters rather than shared across the world economy (chart 2). Part of the explanation for the wider containment lies in the oil balance, where a drawdown in stocks without precedent in the available record has substituted for the spare capacity that once cushioned disruptions of this kind (chart 3), and part lies in the character of the commodity shock itself, which now has at least three unrelated sources (chart 4). Labour markets are where the strain has begun to show, and it is showing very unevenly across the advanced economies (chart 5). In European bond markets, meanwhile, the consequences have turned political, with the premium demanded on French debt over German reaching levels not seen since the euro crisis (chart 6).

<iframe data-testid="embed-iframe" style="border-radius:12px" src="https://open.spotify.com/embed/episode/4DAJAbXceeDZ8OWSAYwt1J?utm_source=generator&si=1f3811ccd37f4930" width="100%" height="152" frameBorder="0" allowfullscreen="" allow="autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; fullscreen; picture-in-picture" loading="lazy"></iframe>

Charts of the Week: Narrow Shoulders

Our global data offering is unparalleled in terms of coverage, quality, and organization. We offer 290+ databases from 2500 government and private sources, a wealth of key survey and forecast data covering the world’s economies, and a robust offering of archive databases that drive machine learning for big data applications.

Optimized for precision analytics, our data is seamlessly integrated with Microsoft Office and all leading statistical packages through our DLX® software and platform independent HaverView™ website. We further offer direct database feeds, client server or cloud-based delivery, and RESTful API.


Discover Haver!

Data

Software

Connectivity

Research

University

Archive

World Economy Tracked for You

Diverse Data Sources

Driven By Quality

Global Data

Speed Matters

Economic Commentary

Charts of the Week: Narrow Shoulders

Recent Commentaries

U.S. New Home Sales Rebound to an Eight-Month High in August

US Current Account in Q2: Additional Slippage

U.K. Retail Sales Come Up Lame in September

S&P PMIs Five of Seven Early Reporters Show Stronger Output in September

Featured Data Additions, September 23, 2026

Oil: Running Out of Slack

Latest Releases

Graph of the Week

Even with strong capex, US nonfinancial corporations are generating more cash than they are investing

Economy in Brief

Viewpoints