Haver Analytics
Haver Analytics

Introducing

Robert Brusca

Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media.   Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.

Publications by Robert Brusca

  • The GfK consumer climate index for Germany has fallen, reaching a new lower low in September at -36.5. This is a drop from August when the index was at -30.9. The index dropped from its previous all-time low to a new lower low in September. The monthly decline of 5.6 points is the biggest monthly decline since May of this year and represents real month-to-month deterioration, not just some further slippage. A month-to-month decline larger than 5.6 points occurs less than 2% of the time…and this is a drop from what had been an all-time low

    The components for the GfK index lag by one month; we have component values for August as the most up-to-date readings. The August reading for economic expectations improved slightly to -17.6 from -18.2 in July. The August reading for economic expectations stands in the lower 11th percentile of its historic queue of data. Income expectations also improved slightly, logging a -45.3 reading in August compared to -45.7 in July. The July reading was the all-time low for the income series so the ranking for August income expectations is in the lower 0.4 percentile of its historic queue of data. The propensity to buy reading for August slipped further to -15.7 from -14.5 in July; this reading has a lower 17.6 percentile queue standing.

    All the components are weak. The propensity to buy is in the lower 20th percentile of its queue of data, economic expectations are in their lower 11-percentile while income expectations are just a few ticks off their all-time low, logging the second lowest reading on record. These are not encouraging signs for Germany or for the consumer.

    Other Europe There are also readings for Italy, France, and the U.K. in the table; these are up to date through August. In Italy, consumer confidence improved to 98.3 in August from 94.8 in July. In France, the INSEE reading moved to 82.2 from 79.6. But in the U.K., there was deterioration as the consumer confidence reading fell to -44 from -41 to reach a new all-time low for U.K. confidence.

  • The INSEE business indicator for French industry climate fell to 103.6 in August from 105.6 in July. The index had been at 107.9 in June and 106.3 in May. The decline in August brings it down to a significantly lower level compared to where it's been in recent months. The indicator has a 63.3 percentile standing in its historic queue data back to 2001. This is a moderate standing above the median which occurs at a ranking of 50.

    Manufacturing production expectations post a -1.6 reading in August, an improvement from July's -5 reading and from the readings of June and May as well. The ranking on data back to 2001, however, is at the 51.8 percentile of its historic queue of data, marking it as barely above its historic median value – a more or less 'average' reading.

    The recent trend for production has a 4.2 reading in August compared to much stronger readings in May, June and July. However, the percentile standing in August is only at a 40.5 percentile standing in its historic queue of data back to 2001. This marks the reading as substantially below its historic median.

    The 'personal likely trend' for production is meant to get the survey participant to look at their own industry rather than at industry overall. Respondents to the survey expect their personal likely trend will improve in August to 13 from what were much weaker values over the previous three months. This improvement to 13 has a queue percentile standing at its 71.7 percentile which is a reasonably strong reading.

    Orders & demand in August have slipped to a -10 reading in August from -4.7 in July, compared to stronger readings in June and May. At -10, orders & demand have a 70.4 queue percentile standing, a moderately firm reading. Foreign orders & demand also weakened in August, falling to -7.6 from a reading of -4.9 in July and stronger values in June and in May. The August queue standing is at its 70th percentile, like the standing for orders & demand overall.

    August inventory levels are up to 16.6 in August from 9.3 on July and represent an elevated level compared to June and May as well. This is a high reading at the 94th percentile of its historic queue of data.

    Price trends show their own likely price trend at 39.7 in August, up from 35.3 in July. However, this is a weaker reading than in June and in May by a substantial margin. However, the August reading still has a queue percentile standing in the 96.8 percentile: that is within the top 4% of all observations back to 2001. Firms clearly are raising their own prices.

    Manufacturing prices overall are seeing weakening month-to-month as August has a 55.3 reading compared to July at 63.3 and even stronger levels in June and in May. The manufacturing price level has a 95.5 percentile standing, just slightly weaker than for own prices. These readings indicate continued price pressures for the period ahead.

    Looking at these survey responses compared to what they were before COVID struck, in January 2020, we have the industry climate index higher by only one point. Manufacturing production expectations are higher by less than one point. The recent production trend is higher by 5.4 points while the personal likely trend is up by 4.2 points. Orders & demand as well as foreign orders & demand are both weaker by 0.2 points. Prices, however, are hugely stronger than they were before COVID struck. The price index for the own likely price trend is up by 37 points; the manufacturing level is up by 49 points. Clearly firms have experienced a lot of inflation since COVID struck and their perceptions of prices remain high as we've seen from the percentile standings.

  • Finland
    | Aug 24 2022

    Finland's PPI Edges Lower

    Inflation in the euro area is and continues to be excessive. Finland continues to follow along with the pack. Finland’s PPI is up by 28.9% over 12 months, it's up at a 36.4% annual rate over six months and then it has “cooled" to a 27.3% annualized pace over three months. Ranked among a group of 14 European countries - mostly European Monetary Union members- Finland's year-over-year inflation rate in June stand at 9th among this group of 14 members. At that time, Finland's year-over-year inflation rate was 31.6% compared to 35.9% for the European Monetary Union overall at that time; the highest inflation rate among this group of countries in Europe was Belgium where inflation was up 50.5%, followed by Spain at 43.4%, and then Italy at 42.0%. Finland’s PPI inflation ranks ninth among these 14 members in June; that means that Finland is one of the middling inflation countries in Europe (This comparison group consisted of Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Austria, Denmark, Greece, Ireland, the Netherlands, Finland, Sweden, Belgium, and Luxembourg).

    In July, Finland's producer price index fell by 1%; it had risen by 3.2% in June and by 4% in May.

    The price of manufacturing goods fell by 2.1% in July after rising 3.2% in June and 3.1% in May.

    Within the manufacturing sector, consumer durable goods prices rose by 0.5% in July, consumer nondurable goods prices rose by 2.1% and investment goods saw prices rise by 0.3%. These increases show continued acceleration. Consumer durable goods prices had fallen by 0.2% in June, consumer nondurable goods prices had risen by 1.3% in June, and investment goods prices in July rose at the same pace as in June of 0.3%. The relief of headline price pressure in Finland reflects intermediate and raw goods whose prices are reflecting weakness in oil and other raw materials.

    Manufacturing price momentum Demand continues to pull other prices higher. For all of manufacturing, prices gained 28.2% over 12 months and accelerate to a 44.3% annual rate over six months but then price gains dropped back sharply to a 17.2% annual rate over three months.

    This progression is echoed ever so slightly by consumer durable goods where prices rise by 11.4% over 12 months, accelerate to rise by 17.4% over six months and then prices barely cool their trend rising by a 16.6% annualized over three months.

    Consumer nondurable goods prices are up by 13.3% over 12 months, they accelerate to a rise of 18.3% annualized over six months and accelerate further rising at a 23.7% pace over three months. Nondurables are still experiencing clear price acceleration.

    Investment goods prices rise at a 10.4% annual rate over 12 months and 11.3% annual rate over six months, a small acceleration, and then decelerate to an 8.8% pace over three months.

  • Global| Aug 23 2022

    PMIs Weaken in August

    The S&P Global manufacturing PMIs and services PMIs on a flash basis weakened in August. The European Monetary Union, Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Japan, and the United States each show a weaker composite, a weaker manufacturing reading, and a weaker services reading in August compared to July. Dialing back one month, July saw that out of the 18 assessments possible only four showed month-to-month improvements. The U.K. was an exception having an improvement in its service sector in July that also strengthens the headline; Japan was an exception in July having an improvement in services that also strengthened its headline. In June, there are only three of 18 comparisons that improve month-to-month; they include manufacturing in Germany and the services sector in Japan.

    The unweighted average manufacturing PMI value in August has slipped to 49.5 showing contraction on average. This compares to an average level of 51.6 in July and at 54.4 in June. The average services reading for the six entries in the table has slipped with a diffusion rating of 49.2, indicating minor contraction. This is a slippage from a level of 53.4 in July and 54.8 in June. The deterioration for both manufacturing and services has been relatively recent and relatively rapid. Viewed as stand-alone readings in August, the EMU services sector at 50.2 still shows expansion, France at 51.0 shows expansion, the United Kingdom at 52.5 shows expansion. Manufacturing in August shows expansion in the U.S. and in Japan with Japan’s 51.0 diffusion reading and the U.S. reading of 51.3. Where there are exceptions, they are not glaring exceptions.

    On balance, over these three months viewed individually and collectively, the weakness is broad.

    When we compare the three-month, six-month and 12-month averages, we are comparing them from a base in July, not in August which still has preliminary data.

    Over three months on this basis, there are 9 of 18 readings that strengthen - a split decision. Over six months, there are 8 of 18 readings strengthen. Over 12 months, most of the readings strengthen with only four of them weakening.

    Composite readings However, we can see from the table that August, once it gets into the mix, is going to be another weakening force that is going to weigh on these sequential trends. We can already see that the ranking of the August levels is extremely weak with the headline or a composite index ranging from the strongest value of a 36.4 percentile standing in Japan to the weakest standing at a 5.5 percentile standing in U.S. The average composite standing for the group is at a 22.5 percentile standing; it is in the lower 4th to lower 5th of the countries’ historic pooled queue of values.

    Manufacturing and Services Manufacturing standings on the other hand range between a high of a 45.5 percentile standing in Japan to a 3.6 percentile outstanding in the U.K. The average percentile standing for the group is at the 24.4 percentile mark in the lower one-fourth of its historic queue of values. Services standings range between a high of 45.5 percentile in the U.K. to a low of 5.5 percentile in the U.S. The average percentile standing is at the 30.2 percentile.

    These readings all are weak. Not only are the preliminary readings all weak or weakening month-to-month but the queue standings all reside below the 50th percentile; that's across all countries and for all three sectors of the composite for manufacturing and for services. It means all sectors are performing at less than their median rate.

    Looking at the changes the composite indexes back to January 2020 before COVID struck, all the composite indexes in this table are weaker than they were in January 2020. All the services sectors are weaker than they were in January 2020; only three manufacturing sectors are stronger than they were in January 2020 and those are for the European Monetary Union as a whole, for Germany, and for Japan.

    The magnitudes of change The one-month change in the composite indexes averages -3.9 points for manufacturing, the drop is -2.2 points, for the service sector it’s -4.2 points. In August, the services sectors were easing twice as fast as manufacturing. Over three months, the change in conditions is much flatter. The composite indexes declined by 5.5 points across these 6 table entries. The manufacturing sector is receding on average by 5.3 points over three months while the services sectors unwind by 5.6 points on average. Over three months, we're seeing roughly the same rate of erosion or deterioration in services as in manufacturing.

    Over 12 months, conditions are a little bit different again. The 12-month average drop in the composite indexes is 6.8 points, while for manufacturing the average drop is 9.8 points and for the services sector the average drop is 6 points. Over 12 months, the manufacturing sectors are deteriorating faster than services. Germany is a minor exception to this trend. The U.K. conforms to it more significantly than any other country with a -14.1 drop in its manufacturing index over 12 months compared to just a -3.1 drop for services. Japan is the only country in the table that shows a 12-month improvement in services against a 1.7 drop in manufacturing.

  • The National Bank of Belgium index for consumer confidence rose to -11 in August from -13 in July, returning to its June level. Three months ago, the index stood at -13. Six months ago, it stood at +1. Twelve months ago, it stood at +5. Despite the month-to-month improvement, the index has been on a weakening trend; it has weakened most sharply over three months. The index positions itself in the lower one-third a of its values since 1991 with a 32.1 percentile queue standing. This reading means that the index has been weaker than its current value about one-third of the time, marking this as among some of the weaker readings for Belgium since 1991, roughly the last 30 years.

    The economic situation for the last twelve months made an improvement to -57 in August from -63 in July. This is a weak assessment. The August trailing assessment of -57 has a queue standing in its lower 7.6 percentile. The companion rating this month, for the next twelve months, looking ahead, has a reading at -32, which is a slight improvement from July's minus 37 rating. The 12-month ahead August reading is even (slightly) weaker in its historic queue than the evaluation of the past twelve months with a 5.8 percentile standing. Clearly the economic situation has been poor, and is expected to remain poor, despite the slight month-to-month improvement. This month's report earns the sound of one-hand clapping.

    Price trends in the BNB survey over the previous 12 months more or less stabilized with a reading of 86 in August compared to 84 in both June and July. Over the next 12 months, some progress on inflation is expected with the index falling to 19 compared to 25 in July and 34 in June. Nonetheless, the broad progression of this index has been for deterioration with the 12-month-ago reading at 19, the six-month-ago reading at 33, and the three-month-ago reading at 41. Clearly, this shows a local trend of improvement that is resisting a broader trend of deterioration. The standing for price trends for the next 12 months is at its 52.6 percentile mark. This is an extremely sharp improvement from the 99.7 percentile standing that evaluates price trends over the last 12 months. The standing assessments show that inflation has progressed from some of the very weakest reading in the history of the survey to readings that are far more centrist near the middle of the distribution. That level of assessment might seem surprisingly high given the height of inflation in the EMU relative to target that prevails today. It may be colored partly by encouragement that the past extraordinary inflation environment is being put to rest.

    The unemployment forecast shows some heightened risk of unemployment in the August index as it climbs to 16 from a level of 12 where it stood in both June and July. The unemployment forecast has had an uneven progression from twelve-months to six-months to three-months. Its current standing, at a value of 16, has a 34.7 percentile standing in its historic queue of data marking unemployment expectations is being close to the lower one-third of values in its queue of ordered data since 1991. Unemployment is more greatly feared, but the fear is not pronounced.

    The major purchase index for the next 12 months has stabilized over three months at a reading of -20 in August. It had steadily eroded from twelve-months to six-months to three-months. Similarly, the present index has eroded and shows only a one-month improvement after a string of erosion.

    The financial situation for the last 12 months stabilized at readings of -17 in each of the last three months. However, that represents a deterioration since 12 months ago the reading was -5, six months ago it was -11 and three months ago it was -13. The assessment of the last 12 months has deteriorated and then stabilized. It has stabilized at a level that is in the lower one percentile of its historic queue up data! The assessment of the past 12-months has been extremely poor for a household's financial situation. Over the next 12 months, the household financial situation garners a -8 reading in August compared to -7 in July and -8 in June. The broader progression shows that twelve months ago, the household assessment was at zero, six months ago it was at -5 and three months ago it was at -9. The current -8 rating has a 1.6 percentile standing, once again an extremely weak reading, among the weakest 2% of ratings by households of their financial situation looking ahead to the next twelve months since 1991.

    Households rate their ability to save over the next twelve months more favorability this month; the favorability of saving currently improved slightly as well. Their respective standings, however, are moderate. The next twelve-month reading has a 63.9 percentile standing and the assessment of the current ability to save has a 52.2 percentile standing. These are mid-range assessments.

  • Japan's inflation rose by 0.4% in July after slowing to a 0.1% gain in June. The category, all prices excluding fresh food saw prices grow by 0.5% compared to a 0.2% June gain. All items less food & energy rose by 0.2% after gaining 0.1% in June. Western economies would kill for these trends…

    Across the eight major components listed in Japan's CPI, four of them show extremely weak (or no) gains month-to-month in July. Education, medical care, and miscellaneous goods show prices rising by 0.1% while housing showed no gain at all month-to-month. Food & beverage prices rose by 0.5% month-to-month. Clothing & personal items prices rose by 0.5% and transportation & communication prices rose by 0.4%, while reading & recreation prices surged by 0.7% but that followed a 0.6% June drop.

    For the headline and for most components, in fact - for nearly all components, Japan shows no tendency- no clear trend - for inflation to either accelerate or decelerate. The one significant departure from this is for all items excluding food & energy where prices rise 0.3% over 12 months, at a 2.2% annual rate over six months and at a 2.4% annual rate over three months completing a clear sequential cycle of trend acceleration for the core CPI.

    However, the headline and the headline excluding fresh food do not show any such pattern nor do any of the 8 major components of Japan's CPI. None of the 8 main components show either inflation clearly accelerating or decelerating. All of the components have a mixed pattern. Only when in the core, with food & energy stripped out, does this trend emerge. Over 12 months compared to the year ago, headline and core inflation both accelerate as does the total CPI excluding fresh food. And among the eight major categories inflation accelerates for food & beverages, medical care, and for transportation & communication. This is despite the fact that the inflation rates actually are negative for medical care and for transportation & communication but those prices fall at a slower pace over 12 months than they did one year ago, hence ‘acceleration.'

    Six-month trends show acceleration for the headline to the core CPI and for the total CPI excluding fresh food. Food & beverage prices accelerate, housing costs accelerate, miscellaneous prices accelerate, reading & recreation prices accelerate, and transportation & communication prices also accelerate over six months compared to 12 months. Among the eight components of the CPI, five of them accelerate and three of them decelerate.

    Three-month trends show a weakening of inflation compared to six-months for the headline CPI and for the headline excluding fresh foods. The core rate continues to accelerate. Among the eight detailed categories, prices accelerate in half and they decelerate in the other half. Prices accelerate for clothing & personal items, for education, for medical care, and for reading & recreation.

    If we calculate acceleration in a truncated fashion, by skipping the six-month to one-year change and just comparing the three-month annualized change to the 12-month change, then Japan's inflation rate accelerates in the headline categories as well as in all 8 detailed product categories. I supposed we can conclude that inflation is lurking in Japan and rising with some degree of subtlety.

    We see the strength in prices in the quarter-to-date developments. The current data are for July, so that's the first month of the third quarter. These calculations compute the annualized inflation rate by taking the July gain over the previous quarter's average and compounding that gain from the center of the quarter. On that basis, headline inflation runs at 3.2% early in Q3. The CPI excluding fresh foods runs at a 4.2% pace. The core rate rises at a 2.2% rate which is actually a pace slightly below its three-month pace. The quarter-to-date calculation across the eight detailed components of the CPI show price gains that generally are slightly weaker than the gains calculated over three months.

  • Inflation in the European Monetary Union in July finalizes at 8.8% year-over-year. The gain for July is 0.7%, slightly softer than June's 0.8% and the same as May’s 0.7% rise, marking a strong run of price increases in the European Monetary Area.

    Among the largest economies and the EMU, Spain's year-on-year inflation rate at 10.7% leads the parade, followed by Germany at 8.4%, Italy at 8.3%, and France at 6.8%. The United Kingdom, the second largest European economy but not a European Monetary Union member and no longer a European Union (EU) member, logs inflation at a 10.1% pace over 12 months. In all cases, the year-over-year inflation rate has accelerated at least slightly compared to the month before, and (of course), sharply form the year before.

    While it seems inflation has been elevated for a long time, comparison with inflation rates a year ago remind us that that's an illusion. Twelve-months ago the pace in the European Monetary Union was excessive but stood at 2.4%. German inflation was excessive at 3.2%, Spanish inflation was excessive at 2.9%, but French inflation was within the target parameters at 1.5%, as was Italy's at 1.0%. Inflation in the euro area has been creeping up over the target for a while, but the aggressively excessive inflation is still a relatively new phenomenon.

    Core vs. headline The results for core inflation underscore that core inflation rates are significantly below the headline. The overall European Monetary Union rate at 8.8% is more than double the pace of the core that is up by 4% year-over-year in July. Individual member rates are substantially below headline rates as well. Spain has the highest core rate at 6.2% (but that is still only about 60% of the headline pace in Spain). Spain’s strong core pace is followed by Germany’s, whose ex-energy rate is 4.4%, then by France where the core is up 4.3%, and in Italy with the core up by 4.2%. In comparison, the U.K. has a much hotter core inflation rate running at a 6.6% pace.

    Acceleration The tendencies for inflation to accelerate breakdown a little bit this month. For headline inflation six-month inflation accelerates compared to 12-month inflation but then the three-month inflation rate steps down to a 9% pace from a 10.1% pace. Core inflation at 4% year-over-year dips to a 3.7% pace over six months and then jumps back to a 4.5% pace over three months accelerating vs. both its six-month pace and its 12-monht pace.

    Acceleration by country Headline inflation among European Monetary Union members shows all members with accelerating inflation from 12-months to six-months. However, from six-months to three-months inflation accelerates in Italy and in Spain while it decelerates in Germany and in France. However, only in Germany among EMU members is the three-month pace of inflation below the 12-month pace of inflation.

    Core inflation among EMU members shows acceleration everywhere from 12-months to six-months. From six-months to three-months, however, ex-energy inflation decelerates in Germany, while core inflation accelerates and all the other EMU members. Also, German core inflation is lower over three months than over 12 months but for all the other EMU members three-month inflation exceeds 12-month inflation.

    Energy prices Oil and energy prices have been a clear driver of inflation in the European Monetary Union with Brent prices expressed in euros up by 64.1% over 12 months, up at an 85.9% annual rate over six months and now slowing as they are up at the 21.6% annual rate over three months. The monthly data shows sizable Brent price increases in May and June but in July prices broke falling by 7.3% month-to-month.

  • Japan's trade deficit widened in July rising to ¥2.1 trillion from ¥1.95 trillion in June. Goods exports rose by 2.1% in July; goods imports rose by 3.5%. Imports continue to outpace exports over various horizons from 12-months and over shorter periods.

    Growth rates show imports at an increase of 51% over 12 months, rising at a 59.9% annual rate over six months and at a 66.2% annual rate over three months. By comparison, exports are up at a 21.2% annual rate over 12 months, a 28% annual rate over six months and at a 40.4% annual rate over three months.

    Imports are rising strongly on the back of rising energy prices but also on the back of a weakening yen that increases the import bill. Of course, that increase also includes energy prices because not only are the dollar prices for energy high but when translated into yen at the weaker yen exchange rate the cost of energy rises again.

    Ironically, exports are doing better; the export growth rate is 21% over six months moving up to a 40% annual rate over three months. The weaker yen will provide a great opportunity to increase Japanese exports in nominal terms. When the yen weakens, against the dollar, it causes the dollar price of Japanese exports to fall and that should increase exports. At the same time, Japanese exporters can take some of that decline of the yen into a price increase and actually raise their yen prices while lowering their dollar prices and getting a double kick in export value. This, in fact, might be starting to happen but because import prices are so strong you still don't see it in the trade balance.

    This is not unusual because of something known as the J-curve phenomenon. The J-curve phenomenon refers to the fact that when a currency changes its value the price effects go through first while the volume effects occur later. In this case when the yen gets weaker, import prices in Japan will go up quickly. In time, Japanese consumers may decide that goods are more expensive, and they may buy fewer of them. That will cause import volumes to recede blunting the impact on import value from the price rise. On the export side, the weaker yen should encourage foreigners to purchase more Japanese products, but that volume effect takes some time and in the meantime there is a bigger increase in import value than in export value that widens the trade deficit which gets worse before it gets better.

    The table shows that over 12 months the yen is averaging ¥119.6 against the dollar, whereas over three months it's at ¥133.2. In July it has slipped further to ¥136.7. Over 12 months – point-to-point – the yen has fallen by 24% against the dollar whereas over three months it's falling at a 37% annual rate, a slightly faster pace. The broad yen index that figures the yen value against Japan's most important trade partners, broadly shows the yen is weaker over 12 months, at a -16.9% annual rate. Over three months it's falling at about the same pace, at a -17% annual rate.

    The price data showed that export prices are rising by 19% over 12 months and at a 20% pace over three months. Import prices are up 47.9% over 12 months and at a 57.6% annual rate over three months. Import prices are really killing Japanese imports and the trade balance.

  • The overview table shows that the current situation in the eyes of the ZEW experts strengthened in August in the U.S. and the U.K. but weakened in Germany. Expectations for the U.S. firmed, but expectations for Germany weakened. Inflation expectations for the U.S. weakened, but they strengthened for Germany and the euro area. Short-rate expectations strengthened for both the euro area and for the U.S. Long-term rate expectations rose for both Germany and the U.S. ZEW experts, looking at currently weak stock market indices, saw them strengthening in the euro area, Germany, and the U.S. They look for the dollar to continue to strengthen versus the euro. That's the summary of the month-to-month changes in this month’s survey.

    Economic conditions and expectations The ZEW experts see the economic situation as weak in the euro area, Germany, and the U.S. All these jurisdictions have economic situations that rank below their 40th percentile marking them as weaker than their respective medians (since the median occurs at the 50th percentile). Economic expectations for Germany are this week or weaker 1.4% of the time- very rarely. In the U.S., economic expectations are this weak or weaker less than 10% of the time- also rarely.

  • Japan
    | Aug 15 2022

    Japan's GDP Accelerates

    Real GDP in Japan rose by 2.2% at an annual rate in the second quarter of 2022. This is a marked acceleration from the 0.1% rise in the first quarter of 2022 but slower than the 4% recovery pace in the fourth quarter of 2021 after GDP declined in the third quarter of 2021.

    Quarter-to-quarter trends in real GDP components Private sector consumption was up at a sharp 4.6% in Q2 2022 while public consumption accelerated to a 2.2% annualized rate from 1.7% the quarter before.

    Gross fixed investment posted positive growth gaining at a 3.4% annualized rate in Q2, the first quarterly increase since the second quarter of 2021.

    Housing extends a string of quarterly declines as residential investment posted a -7.2% annual rate in Q2, an accelerated pace from a -5.6% rate in Q1 and -5.2% in Q4 2021.

    Exports continue to show increases, rising at a 3.7% rate in the second quarter, up at about the same pace (3.6%) in the first quarter. Imports slowed with 2.7% pace after a 14.8% pace in the first quarter.

    Year-over-year trends in real GDP Year-over-year trends show slight change in the pace of GDP as it grew by 1% over four quarters compared to 0.9% on that same basis in the first quarter. Private consumption has accelerated steadily from a year-over-year rate of 0.4% in the third quarter of 2021 to 1.3% pace in the fourth quarter of 2021 to 2.2% pace in the first quarter of this year and 3% over four quarters in the second quarter. By comparison, public consumption continues to be expansionary but growing only by 1.7% year-over-year and without any clear trend.

    Gross capital formation continues to be under pressure showing a 3.5% drop over four quarters in Q2 2022 compared with a 3.9% drop logged in Q1. Capital spending shows declines over four quarters for each of the last four quarters with the last gain being a 1% rise in the second quarter of 2021. Spending on plant & equipment dropped in Q2 logging a 0.8% decline over four quarters; its last increase was a gain of 1.1% over 4 quarters in Q3 2021.

    Domestic demand in Japan has grown by 1.2% over four quarters in Q2 2022 and had advanced by 1.4% over four quarters in the first quarter of the year. Both of those represent steps up from the previous two quarters; i.e., Q3 2021 and Q4 2021.

    Japan indicators in 2022 Japan's economy continues to struggle. In June, retail sales fell by 1.1% month-to-month while rising by only 1.5% over 12 months. Employment in Japan rose by 0.2% in June and had gained only 0.3% over 12 months. Japan's leading economic index in June fell for the second month in a row; that indicator is down by 1.4% over 12 months. The year-over-year drop in the LEI sits in the 43rd percentile of its historic queue of data; evaluated on its level, instead of its growth rate, it has a 68-percentile standing. That's better but still not very good. However, one of the brighter notes on Japan's economy is its economy watchers index with the current index in June at a 91-percentile standing and looking solid.

    The yen The yen and has been weakening, improving Japan competitiveness in international trade while raising costs to consumers for imported goods- especially energy. Yet, Japan's exports still appear to be engulfed in a protracted slowdown: they have slowed down from a 27.2% pace over four quarters in the second quarter of 2021, to 15.7% pace in the third quarter of that year, and to a 6% pace in the fourth quarter of that year. In the first quarter of 2022 exports grew by 4.6% over four quarters while in the second quarter they were up by only 2.5% over four quarters. Exports have not responded to the weakness in the yen at least not on a year-over-year basis.

    Year-over-year trend in imports show some general slowing from an 11.4% gain over four quarters in the third quarter of 2021 to 5.6% gain in the fourth quarter that improved with 7.3% gain in the first quarter of 2022, but they have slipped back to 3.5% gain in the second quarter of 2022.

  • The European Monetary Union (EMU) posted a 0.7% increase for industrial output in June, following a 2.1% increase in May. Industrial output is solid with a 2.6% growth rate over 12 months, 2.3% growth rate over six months and a 13.8% annualized rate of growth over three months. The tracking for manufacturing growth alone generally follows the same pattern with a 1% gain in June and 11.9% annualized rate over three months.

    The June report completes data for the second quarter. In the second quarter, total output is up at a 4.5% annual rate; manufacturing output is up at a 2.3% annual rate. Output gains by sector are led by consumer durables at a 9.4% annualized rate. Consumer nondurables output rises at a 4.9% pace, capital goods output has come back strongly with a 5.6% annual rate increase, and intermediate goods output showed a decline at a 1.4% annualized rate.

    All the sectors show increases in output compared to the pre COVID level of output in January 2020. Overall output is up 2.7% with manufacturing output up by 2.5% over that span. Consumer durables has the largest gain at 6.3% followed by consumer nondurables at 5.6%. The smallest gain is from the capital goods sector with a rise of 0.9%. Intermediate goods output is up by 2.2% over the span.

    The manufacturing and industrial output performance numbers do not fit well with the manufacturing PMI as the manufacturing PMI show reduced activity in April, May, and June. In all three months manufacturing output progressed from the flat in April to up 1.8% in May and up 1.0% month-to-month in June. However, at a PMI diffusion value of 52, the manufacturing PMI gauge for the EMU does show expansion. But it doesn't show strength; it is showing persistent cooling.

  • The survey of housing market conditions in the U.K. continues to show strength in prices versus weakness in activity. Housing price expectations, however, were reduced on the month as new sales continued to post weaker results and sales prospects fell sharpy to a weak level. The residential survey from the Royal Institute of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) demonstrates the growing malaise and also the mixed set of conditions in the U.K. housing market.

    To be sure, house prices continue to gain. But the pace of those gains is slowing as the diffusion index is down to 63 in July from 65 in June and 71 in May. Still, these surveyed values, which are net diffusion indexes, show that on balance there are more prices increasing than decreasing since the reading for July is over 50. Viewed as a percentile standing on data back to 1999, the current three-month trend for the price diffusion index has been higher only about 8% of the time. On this observation alone we might think some weakening is in order.

    The clear take away from this survey about prices is that they're still moving up and the upward momentum is still significant. However, a second and perhaps more important take away from this is that the breath of the improvement in the index is shrinking. Recently in this cycle - as recent as April of this year, and February - the house price diffusion index had values as high as 78. Back in June and July of a year ago, the house price index had values of 80 in July and 83 in June.

    These conditions have changed as house price expectations have withered; expectations for three-months ahead fell to a net reading of +1 in July from +2 in June and from +12 in May; over the last three months this metric averaged +5; over six months it averaged +16. Clearly house price expectations are diminishing and although the net readings are still positive that is an outlook for prices to rise that is now down to its thinnest possible margin of one-point. Viewing this reading of price expectations against historic data, price expectations have been stronger than this nearly 58% of the time. The metric for price expectations is now below its historic median. And remember this is a thinning and a narrow margin for expected price increases in an economy with severe rising inflation in other prices.

    At the same time, new sales log the value of -13 in July which is a very slight improvement from the -14 reading in June. New sales had slipped to that level from -5 in May. The six-month average for new sales has been -4 while the 12-month average is -7. Actual sales have been logging net negative values for some time, but clearly the weakness has just ramped up and gotten more severe.

    Expectations for three months ahead echo these changes but with a bit more emphasis. Sales expectations in July slipped to -20 from -11 in June and to minus-one in May. Their six-month average is at zero while their 12-month averages is at +7. Sales expectations have averaged positive numbers for 12 months and flat numbers over six months; this series this has transitioned into a relatively steep negative outlook with the July reading of -20. The July reading, in fact, has a standing in the lower 3.2 percentile of its historic queue of readings on sales expectations. Sales expectations are weaker than this only about 3% of the time. And this is not surprising because actual sales have slipped to a ranking below the 25th percentile so that they are weaker than their current level only about one-quarter of the time. Current and expected-future sales erosions are in sync