Haver Analytics
Haver Analytics

Introducing

Robert Brusca

Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media.   Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.

Publications by Robert Brusca

  • United Kingdom
    | Dec 18 2024

    UK Industry Sees a Bleak Future

    UK industry turns a corner for the worse… The report on the United Kingdom industrial sector survey in December from the CBI is a crushing blow to anyone looking for recovery to take hold in the United Kingdom led by the industrial sector. The report shows significant, substantial, and even enormous deterioration in December in metrics involving total orders export orders and expected volume over the next three months. There is no silver lining here and, in fact, to make matters worse in the face of all of this weakness and expected weakness… average prices expected over the next three months move up sharply in December compared to what had been expected in November.

    Total orders declined to reach a reading of -40 in December from -19 in November. Export orders in December slipped to -37 after logging -27 in November. The only thing close to a silver lining here is that the stocks of finished goods have a reading of 20 slightly lower than 21 in November indicating that inventories are not piling up at the moment and adding to and more horrific inventory cycle. Nonetheless diffusion readings on stocks of ‘20’ and ‘21’ are quite high.

    Looking ahead In the looking ahead category, we have output volume for the next three-months fall to a reading of minus 31 from plus 9 in November. This is a really sharp slowdown that leaves the output volume series in the 2.3 percentile of its queue of data back to 1992, an extremely low reading. Average prices for the next three-months at the same time take on a diffusion value of 23, up from 11 in November after having got to zero in October. The reading of plus 23 in December has an 87-percentile standing, an extremely high level indicating that not only is growth in trouble but that inflation, or at least expected inflation, is back.

    A drop in expected output of historic proportions The drop in expected output three-months ahead is a 40-point shift month-to-month (to -31 from +9) on data back to 1990. This is the second worst shift in the monthly reading in this survey, surpassed only during Covid in April of 2020. That is especially shocking since, at that time, there was a specific event to account for the shock-shift in expectations, unlike now. Now, the UK faces a period of domestic political stability, a world with global political shifts in progress in other countries – a changing of the geopolitical guard - and economic struggling as well as ongoing war in Ukraine and a worsening of instability in the Middle East. But this CPI reading is a horrific decline to impact one month’s reading. Meanwhile, most of those background events are not new and have been in progress. It appears that some watershed has been passed that businesses can no longer ignore.

    Dilemma at the BOE Of course, the Bank of England has flipped the switch and has been cutting interest rates. And at its last meeting while it cut rates there was an accompanying message that it might be a while before the bank cut rates again. And now the bank is being put in a real dilemma because the state of the economy seems to call for rate reductions while the inflation background seems to call for rate increases. Welcome to the wild whacky world of central banking!

    Weakness across the board The percentile standings of the various categories show total orders at a 6.5-percentile standing, extremely weak with export orders at a 14-percentile standing, stocks -while not changing much month-to-month - have an 89.6-percentile standing. As noted, the output volume for the next three-months has a 2.3-percentile standing with prices expected over the next three months at an 87-percentile standing. There's nothing here that's good news and nothing that is going to make policy making in the United Kingdom any easier. It's certainly going to make life for the new government much more difficult and policy at the Bank of England much more contentious. It's definitely not a good way to end the old year and to usher in a new one but reality is what it is and in the United Kingdom the reality has just turned quite sour.

  • The Zew reading from the survey of financial experts in Germany produces a view of a weaker economic situation in the Euro-Area and in Germany but with some improvement in the United States. The degree of improvement is small for the US and the deterioration is small for Germany. The index ranking falls to -93.1 from -91.4 for Germany, however, for the Euro-Area the setback is considerably larger to a reading of -55.0 from a reading of -43.8 in November. As a result of these shifts on the month, the queue percentile standing for the Euro-Area has slipped to 27.9%, Germany remains extremely weak at a 2.7 percentile reading, while the US reading stands much stronger, at 48.2% just below its historic median which occurs at a ranking of 50%.

    Expectation assessments for Germany and the US show opposite movements with Germany moving up to 15.7 from 7.4 in November while the US slips back to 8.9 in December from 13.3 in November. The expectations readings are not as depressed on a ranking basis as the current statistics are, with Germany moving up to a 44.4-percentile standing and the US slipping back to a 58.1-percentile standing. The US ranking is still above its historic median reading. Improvement for Germany brings the December reading up close to its six-month average and above its three-month average.

    Inflation expectations continue to fall in the Euro-Area and in Germany. In the Euro-Area the fall is relatively sharp to a reading of -23.9 from -13.4 in November; for Germany it's a fall to -25.7 in December from -14.7 in November. The US sees an increase in inflation expectation to plus 12.6 in December from plus 2.7 in November, giving it two straight months of net positive readings on inflation expectations. The queue standings for the period put Euro-Area expectations at a 19-percentile standing, with Germany close by at an 18.1 percentile standing, compared to the US at a 29.6 percentile standing. All of these are below their historic medians, but the US clearly is showing more of a tendency toward inflation in the view of the Zew financial experts.

    Short term interest rate expectations have weakened in the Euro-Area as they have moved up in the United States, which is what you would expect with the shifts in inflation expectations that have been recorded by the Zew experts. The Euro-Area has a ranking of current short term rate expectations at 1.1%, an extremely low ranking, while in the US has short term rate expectations only at 6%, still extremely low.

    Long term rate expectations for Germany have strengthened to a diffusion reading of -3.2 from a reading of -13.3 and for the US they've strengthened more sharply moving into positive territory at +11.4 up from -0.6 in November. The long-term rate expectations for Germany have a 10.7-percentile standing, while for the US the standing is approximately double at 20.5-percentile. Both of these, of course, are still quite low and well below their historic medians that would occur at a ranking of 50%.

    Stock market expectations produce positive diffusion readings across the board but a weakening ranking for the Euro-Area, for Germany, and for the US. While the US has the strongest net diffusion reading and the strongest ranking, it also has the largest step back from November to December as US stock market expectations fall to 31.9 from 53.5. In the case of Germany, they fall to 13.3 from 17.8; for the Euro-Area stock market expectations dropped to 16.5 from 21.9. The Euro-Area ranks at 10.9 percentile, with Germany at the 8.2-percentile level, they compare badly to the US at a ranking of 56.4 percentile, above its historic median.

    The Euro-Area reading is continuing to be quite weak, while U.S. data have been stronger, and we see this reflected in exchange rate movements with the dollar firming. However, economies don't simply move in a linear fashion and while US retail sales recorded on Tuesday, we're quite a bit stronger than expected US industrial production for November unexpectedly stepped back, keeping the US manufacturing sector on the same week footing that we continue to see reported globally. That weakness was well demonstrated in the S&P manufacturing PMIs as reported yesterday. The global economy continues to struggle and to be supported by its services sector.

  • The S&P flash PMI readings show strengthening for the composites across the board except for Australia for the early reporters presented in this table in December. However, it's very much a performance that rests on the services sector that is stronger in each of the reporting countries except Australia, while manufacturing is weaker in all reporting countries in December, except in Japan.

    Sequential weakness over the last three-months Sequential data show a clear weakening over three-months compared to six-months for all the entries in the table except for the US composite and the US services sector. Over six months conditions are much more mixed with ten of the 21 readings showing a stronger result over six-months compared to 12-months. Over 12-months compared to 12-months ago there was a broad strengthening with only four reports of weaker activity on that basis: for manufacturing in Germany, manufacturing in Australia, services in the United Kingdom, and services in the United States. All other entries show strengthening over 12-months compared to 12-months ago (based on averages).

    Sector performance-rankings The sector standing is indicated by the queue rankings that position the December entries in a string of data over five years. They show only six of the 21 rankings above 50% indicating that only six of them lie above their medians for this 5-year period. Two composite rankings are above their medians: the US with the ranking in the 78th percentile and Japan, with its ranking in its 60th percentile. Those are driven by strong service sector rankings, in the case of Japan services that have a 56.7 percentile standing, in the case of the US services at a 72.8 percentile standing. German services have an above median standing at 51.7% while for the European Monetary Union the service sector has a 55.0 percentile standing. But in the case of the Monetary Union with a 20-percentile standing for manufacturing the composite only reaches to 40% (Germany does even worse).

    Covid post-Covid – a sad tale for growth This has been a five year period of exceptional weakness with the composite rankings in all but two countries below their five-year medians The United States and Japan weaker than they were five years ago in January of 2020 just before COVID began, manufacturing sectors are weaker than in January 2020 everywhere except in Japan; only the US and Japan have service sectors that show gains compared to January 2020. Manufacturing has been exceptionally weak during this period. This group of countries shows a current average manufacturing standing in its 22nd percentile, compared to services with an average standing across countries in the table at its 48.7 percentile, and the composite reading currently at an average standing in its 41.9 percentile.

    Summing up Globally conditions are weak and in December the readings continued to be uneven, and this is at the end of a three-month period when conditions show broad weakening compared to six-months. This is not exactly the way central banks had hoped to end the year. Apparently 2024 will end with monetary policy still broadly in an easing cycle but perhaps, these are becoming easing cycles that are entering a less vigorous stage with inflation that has come down from its peaks but has showed signs of being stubborn above the targets that central banks have set for inflation. And it's a period in which economic growth remains weak and it's not showing signs of acceleration. However, is it also -strangely – a time with some good news, when labor markets show full or close to full employment! Ominously the Baltic dry index, which is an index of trade volume globally, shows the trade volume momentum has been slipping in recent weeks - another disappointing sign as the year draws to an end.

  • Industrial production in the European Monetary Union (EMU) was flat in October with manufacturing output up by only 0.1% month-to-month. Consumer goods output fell by 2.2% month-to-month with declines in durable goods and nondurable goods production immediate goods output was flat in October with capital goods output rising by 1.7% All in all, it was a weak month for most of the sectors and even though capital goods output revived it did so after a sharp decline in September

    Sequential growth Sequential growth rates show total output in the monetary union falling 1.3% over 12-months, falling at a more elevated 3.4% annual rate over six-months and then trimming the pace of decline to -0.8% at an annual rate over three-months. Manufacturing trends with some small differences follow that same pattern.

    Sector performance The sectors for industrial output show consumer goods output fairly steady, rising at about a 2.5% pace over 6-months and 12-months but then declining at a 2.6% annual rate over three-months. Consumer durable goods output declines over six-months and 12-months but shows improvement while declining and then posts an increase at a 3.8% annual rate over three-months. Consumer nondurable goods take the opposite pattern, rising at a 3.5% annual rate over 12-months and over six-months and then falling at a 3% annual rate over three-months. Intermediate goods output, on the other hand, posts negative numbers on all horizons: -3.7% over 12-months, -6.3% over 6-months and 5.3% over 3-months. The Output of capital goods also fails to show a clear trend with output falling by 2.2% over 12-months, weakening further at a -4.2% annual rate over six-months, then advancing at a 3.2% annual rate over three-months. There was little guidance in this about where industrial production is trending. The headline for manufacturing simply shows negative growth rates on all horizons without clear tendencies and the sectors are mixed.

    Country performance In October among thirteen of the oldest monetary union members and early reporters of industrial production, seven of them showed manufacturing output declines, this compares to eight of them showing declines in September, and seven showing declines in August. A little over half of the core of reporters in this table are showing declines on a month-to-month basis regularly.

    Countries sequentially Sequential growth rates for the monetary union, as we saw above, show negative growth rates without clear trends. The 13-EMU member countries in this table show six-with output declining over three-months, nine with output declining over six-months and eight with output declining over 12-months. The number with output declining diminishes over three months but not by a lot although the median change in output among these 13-members transitions from negative readings over six-months and 12-months to post a positive reading of 0.4% over 3-months.

    Quarter-to-date On a quarter-to-date basis seven of the 13 member countries in this table should log output declines the median output change among the 13 members was -0.3%, this compares to industrial production overall having a -0.7% decline, and with manufacturing output being flat in the quarter-to-date. Quarter-to-date readings at this point are not that meaningful in and of themselves because October is the first month of the new quarter and so the growth rate is giving us the growth in October from the middle of the previous quarter it simply tells us that we're off to a flat to negative start in the new quarter but the final quarterly growth rate could still be quite different.

    Abject weakness since Covid The final column of the table compares where output is today compared to where it was January 2020. By looking at this column we can see how weak this period has been for the monetary union overall. Output is lower since January of 2020, a period that is now more than 4 1/2 years long; manufacturing output is lower as well. The output of consumer durable goods is lower, the output of intermediate and capital goods is lower, however, the output of consumer nondurable goods over this period is up by 9.8%. Seven of the monetary union members in the table show manufacturing output declines on balance since January of 2020, these are: Portugal, Malta, Luxembourg, Italy, France, Germany, and Austria. This list contains 3 of the 4 largest EMU economies. Among these, Germany has the biggest shortfall in output compared to January 2020 with output lower by 12.1%. Portugal has output lower by 7 percentage points, Luxembourg, an extremely small country, has output lower by 9.1%. The countries that have done well over this period are Ireland where output is up by 51% compared to January of 2020, Greece where output is up by 14.8%, The Netherlands where growth is up by 4.8%, and Belgium where growth is up by 5.5%. Even so few of these statistics are that impressive when you realize that these are raw period-to-period percentage gains over a 5-year period.

    On Balance: The upshot is that output in the European Monetary Union continues to be listless and it isn't showing any sign of breaking out of the torpor that has encompassed it and its various member countries. There are strong three-month gains in output being recorded by Malta, Portugal, Spain, Ireland and by Luxembourg. There are output increases over three-months and six-months in a row by Spain, Malta, and Ireland. Output increases over three-months, six-months, and twelve-months occur in Spain, Malta, and Ireland. These results contrast with declines for three-months in a row in Austria, Belgium, Italy, The Netherlands, and Greece. Countries in the monetary union are continuing to suffer cross currents, and EMU continues to be a difficult place for the European Central Bank to make a single monetary policy that suits all.

  • Inflation in Sweden rose by 0.6% in November after rising by 0.7% in October and gaining 0.2% in September. HICP inflation is on another strong streak in Sweden. But, year-over-year Swedish inflation is up by only 2%. There is a parallax view of price pressure from the domestic inflation gauge where the monthly gains are only about half the gains of the HICP monthly, and where year-on-year inflation is up by only 1.5%, slips to a 0.4% pace over 6-months then accelerates sharpy to a 3% pace over 3-months – quite different from the HICP pattern and inflation levels. Both domestic and HICP inflation are well behaved over 12-months and while these readings differ a lot after that (over 3-Mo and 6-Mo) they both show inflation accelerating over 3-months compared to its 12-month pace. In neither case is inflation still falling.

    In November inflation accelerated for food and non-alcoholic drinks, for health and medical care, for recreation, and for other goods and services. Inflation accelerated in 55.6% of the categories, the same as in October down slightly from 66.7% of the categories with accelerating inflation in September.

    The readings in the pattern for domestic inflation are clear and muted. But HICP inflation in Sweden may be becoming a problem as it stops falling too soon. It may be becoming a bigger problem as sequential inflation rates for 12-months, six-months, and three-months show a steady increase in inflation although that is not accompanied by a steady rise in diffusion.

    Diffusion is derived from the domestic index Over 12-months inflation is decelerating in all categories compared to 12-months ago. This is the sense of progress that Sweden has made on past high inflation. But over six-months compared to 12-months inflation is accelerating in 55.6% of the categories. That occurs with the overall domestic inflation rate rising by to only 0.4% at an annual rate from its 1.5% pace over 12-months; given the decline in the pace of inflation the increase in diffusion is surprising. Over three months the diffusion rating decelerates logging a reading of 33.3%, down from 55.6% over 6-months. The diffusion calculation compares 3-month inflation to the six-month inflation rate across categories. The headline domestic pace, of course, accelerated to 3.0% over 3-months from 0.4% over 6-months – still, diffusion narrowed. Inflation and diffusion are out of step.

    Two inflation measures, quite different inflation What we see here is a substantial difference between the national CPI and inflation as measured according to the HICP. The national CPI shows 12-month inflation at 1.5% dropping down to 0.4% at an annual rate over six months and then re-accelerating the 3% over 3-months, while the HICP shows a steady acceleration in Swedish inflation. The national index shows the step down from 12-months to six-months and then a significant step up over three months, although the step up is to a pace that's only half of the pace that's measured by the HICP. Even so, there is a step up in inflation over 3-months the same as for the HICP. According to the national CPI, there's an increase in prices over 3-months in housing costs to 5.7% from -7.7% and transportation costs that only fall by 2% after falling by 14% over 6-months. But those two readings are enough to accelerate the headline in the national index to 3.0% from 0.4%.

    Inflation rankings The rankings on inflation orders each category on its 12-month price gain historically. This ranking shows the HICP has a 69-percentile rank meaning it has been higher only 31% of the time. On the other hand, the national index has only a 47-percentile rank, which says that it is below the 50% mark, indicating that inflation is below its historic median and that refers to the year-over-year rate of 1.5%. As such, it's below its median and thar is true of all categories of domestic inflation except clothing and footwear, education, healthcare, Recreation, and other goods and services. Costs have become weak by historic standards (below median).

    Inflation is no longer falling Whether we use the domestic gauge or the HICP gauge Sweden's inflation is becoming more of a problem based on momentum. The monthly diffusion numbers have been above 50, indicating there is more acceleration than deceleration for the last three months. However, the national CPI numbers have been persistently below and approximately half the gain being registered by the HICP. The HICP is the kind of index that is used across Europe and by the European Central Bank to assess inflation in the European Monetary Union. All this leaves us with a bit more of a complicated view of inflation in Sweden but at the very least the bottom line is that inflation is no longer falling and that's a trend that's been noted across many countries. Even countries like Sweden that have made tremendous progress over where inflation was a year a year and a half ago have seen progress stall. All of a sudden inflation has become stuck and generally stuck at a level that's higher than where the target is. Sweden has its year-over-year numbers in place, but its shorter tenor numbers are showing more pressure, making the outlook more uncertain. But because of the current pace of inflation being stuck here, it is not so uncomfortable as it is being stuck at current inflation rates elsewhere in the world.

  • Inflation in the European Monetary Union rose sharply in November, logging a 3.1% annual rate increases on a month-to-month basis. This represents an acceleration from a 1.9% annual rate month-to-month change in October and follows a 2.5% annual rate decline month-to-month in September. The core HICP is available only through October, a month when it expanded month-to-month at a 3.2% annual rate, after falling month-to-month in September at a 0.3% annual rate. The month-to-month inflation results and trends are not particularly encouraging.

    Monthly trends mix good with bad news- The table below presents annualized rates of change on all horizons to permit easy comparisons of one tenor with the next. In November, the median annualized inflation rate for this group of 10 countries was an annual rate gain of 1.9%. That represented an acceleration from 0.9% in October; October represented an acceleration from -3.2% at an annual rate in September. All the median results are below the 2% target set by the ECB – and that is good news- but the trend in the monthly data remains adverse. But, of course, we also have the overall EMU results that show inflation just under ‘target’ in October at 1.9% but back to excessive in November at 3.1%.

    Monthly sequences by country disappoint- Looking at the monthly sequence of inflation numbers, Belgium shows monthly inflation trends from September to October to November accelerating steadily, as does Luxembourg, the Netherlands, and Spain. There are no countries in this sample with inflation rates showing step-wise deceleration from September to October to November except Greece.

    Broader sequential inflation patterns However, sequential inflation, viewed broadly from 12-months, to six-months, to three-months, shows deceleration in the headline with 12-month inflation at 2.3%, the six-month pace falling to 1.7%, annualized and the three-month pace down to 0.8% at an annual rate. The core CPI that is calculated by lagging data by one-month shows relative stability over 12 months and six months, amid only a minor 6-month backtracking, and then a drop off in the three-month annualized inflation rate to 2.1% - essentially on-target.

    Broad cross-countries annualized inflation rates over 12 month, six months, and three months, show a steady decline in the pace of inflation for Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, and Ireland. Only Portugal, Spain, and Greece fail to show decelerating patterns; among those countries, there's no discernible acceleration or deceleration tendencies.

    Good news- tempered- The appearance of broad sequential deceleration is good news; however, it does buck the trend of significant accelerating tendencies for inflation over the last three months and that raises some question of where the trend is really headed. Over three months compared to six months inflation decelerates 70% of the categories; over six months compared to 12 months inflation decelerates 90% of the categories; inflation over 12 months compared to what it did 12 months ago shows deceleration in only 40% of the categories. The median inflation rate for the monetary union shows deceleration falling from a 2.4% annual rate over 12 months, to 1% pace over six months, to a 0.2% annual rate over three months inflation progress. But the headline is not as compliant as that. At the same time, good trends are present, and good news is elusive depending on the timeline and metric we wish to focus on.

    Mostly excessive inflation over 12 months- With an ECB target inflation rate of 2%, the 12-month change in the HICP is excessive at 2.3%. The core which lags a month is excessive but the pace at 2.8% year-on-year. Inflation, measure year-on-year, is excessive in Belgium, Germany, the Netherlands, Portugal, Spain, and Greece. Inflation is compliant or below the target set by the ECB in France, Italy, Luxembourg, and then Ireland. Of course, these are only references, only the official EMU-wide inflation rate matters.

  • Manufacturing production trends in the European Monetary Union (EMU) showed slippage in October, with the mean change in production among thirteen of the longest standing members posting a drop of 0.1% following a drop of 0.7% in September and a drop of 0.2% in August.

    Monthly trends Among these 13 members, seven of them posted declines in October including a decline in Germany, the largest economy in the EMU and in Italy, the third largest economy in the monetary union. September had produced declines in eight of the thirteen reporting members; that compares to seven that showed declines in August. On a monthly basis, slightly over half of the reporting countries have been showing declines on a regular basis over the last three months. The largest economy in the monetary union, Germany, has showed declines in two of those months. France, the second largest economy, has showed a decline in only one of those months. Italy, the third largest economy, has showed declines in two of those months. Spain, the fourth largest economy, has logged a decline in only one of those months.

    Sequential trends Sequential growth rates from 12-months to six-months to three-months do not show a clear pattern, but there is an improvement over three months where the median growth rate for these 13 countries is 0.4% at an annual rate. That compares to a decline of 3.1% at an annual rate over six months and a decline of 1.4% at an annual rate over 12 months. Over three months six of the thirteen countries showed declines in industrial production. Over six months, nine of the thirteen countries showed declines. Over 12 months, declines are logged in eight of the thirteen countries. The breadth of the declines in industrial production and the monetary union has therefore not been spreading but it is still significant. Among the largest countries in the monetary union, Spain, the fourth largest economy, does not show any declines in industrial production over 12 months, six months, or three months. Italy, the third largest economy, shows declines over all of those horizons. France shows declines over 12 months and six months; Germany also shows declines over 12 months and six months.

    Momentum: accelerations/deceleration Looked at over 12 months, 50% of the reporting monetary union countries show output accelerating compared to their growth over the 12 months earlier. Over six months 50% are accelerating compared to their 12-month annual growth rates. Over three months the percentage accelerating compared to six-months is slightly lower, at 45.5%. These statistics underpin the sense in which output growth acceleration or deceleration continues to be more mixed than it is dominated by a trend. The propensity for output to either accelerate or decelerate is hovering around the neutral value of 50% over twelve months, six months, and three months. That assessment is in the aggregate. There clearly are members that are showing more weakness and even progressive weakness although there are no members showing progressive acceleration. Greece shows progressive weakness with six-month growth weaker than 12-month growth. Three-month growth weaker than six-month growth and six months weaker than twelve months for the Netherlands, as well as for Belgium and Austria. There are no clear accelerating tendencies. Italy shows a drop in output over 12 months at a 3.7% annual rate then improves to a 1.7% annual rate drop over six months and over three months, making Italy the closest thing there is to showing an accelerating pattern among countries and the monetary union. Still, there are countries that are showing more strength even if it isn't consistent formally acceleration such as Malta that logs a 28.2% annual rate in output over three months and Portugal that has a 25.4% annual rate gain in output over three months. Spain shows output increasing on all horizons and has only a slight step down over six months compared to 12 months; it logs an increase at 14.8% at an annual rate over three months so even though it's not strictly persistent acceleration there's still evidence of some strengthening.

  • Japan
    | Dec 09 2024

    Japan: Economy Watchers

    Japan's economy watcher index improved in November. The future index also improved in November; however, both the current and the future indexes continued to produce readings below 50 indicating that contraction remains the order of the day.

    Economy watchers indexes remain weak These indexes have been skimming below the level of 50 for some time (3-month, current; 9-month, future). Weaker, yes, however, not by much. There is mild contraction indicated in both the current state of the economy and the expected future state of the economy. However, this is not an entirely unusual situation because the ranking of the current index is a 64-percentile standing which indicates the diffusion index is above its median which also sends home the message that a below-50 reading has some sense of normalcy to it for Japan (evaluated on data since 2003). The same is true for the future index, at 49.4, is below 50 and has a queue percentile standing at its 56.5 percentile, above its median for this same period.

    Current Index The current index has month-to-month index changes that are mid-range for a diffusion score of 50%. But October and September have diffusion scores below 50, showing more indexes are weakening month-to-month than are strengthening. Sequentially, the readings are compared on a period-average-to-period-average basis. The 12-months average improves in 90% of the components compared to the average of 12-months ago. Comparing the 6-month average to the average over 12 months shows that no sector improved. Comparing the 3-month average to the six-month average across line items, 60 percent of the sectors improved.

    Future Index The future index improved broadly month-to-month in November with a diffusion reading in November at 80%, up from only 10% in October and 30% in September. The diffusion reading on the future index over 12 months, 6 months, and 3 months, are similar to the pattern of the current indexes. There is strong breadth over 12 months, no improvement over 6 months compared to 12-months, and a reading showing 60% improvement over 3 months compared to 6 months. Note that these metrics are different from the period-to-period change in the table that is constructed from point-to-point data (not averages). But the signals really are quite similar (except for the 12-month point-to-point results, that show broad weakness in contrast the broad strength signal by comparing averages).

  • Germany
    | Dec 06 2024

    German IP Drops, Unexpectedly

    German IP fell by 1% in October, led by declines of 1% in consumer goods output, a 0.4% decline in capital goods output, and a 0.4% gain in intermediate goods. Output had fallen and fallen sharply across the board in September. That fall was one of the main reasons that expectations this month were slated for a bounce-back.

    Despite this, the pace of decline has slowed over three months. German IP falls by 4.7% over 12 months; it drops at an annual rate of 9.1% over six months and then drops at a three-month annualized rate of 1.8%. Consumer goods output comes closer to having an ongoing accelerating decline in progress. Capital goods output declines at a 4.9% pace over 12 months and declines at an 8.1% annual rate over six months then shifts to log a strong 9.8% increase at an annual rate over three months. In contrast, intermediate goods output shows declines on all horizons without and clear trend beyond that.

    Surveys for German industrial performance generally get weaker from 12-month to 6-month to 3-month, except for IFO manufacturing expectations that fluctuate and side-slip. France, Spain, Portugal, and Norway report early IP data for October. Sequentially, only Spain has a pattern and that is accelerating. The rest show fluctuation but three of the European countries (exception, Norway) show IP rising over three months.

    Still, the queue standings for the various metrics in the table are uniformly low. Among the 18-rankings in the table, only three of them stand above their 50-percentile which puts them above their respective historic median year-over-year gains. Spain and Portugal show historical strong manufacturing IP gains while for Germany real orders have a standing above their historic median.

    On balance, it is another disappointing economic report for Germany. The manufacturing sector remains under pressure although there is some evidence of slightly better growth in other European economies. For the most part, the quarter-to-date readings show ongoing weakness.

  • German real orders fell by 1.5% in October after a surge of 7.2% in September. However, the September surge had followed a plunge of 5.4% in August. The German order series have been extremely volatile with volatility present both in the foreign series and in the domestic series. Foreign orders rose by 0.8% in October after jumping by 9.3% in September; that followed a 1.9% drop in August. Domestic orders fell by 5.3% in October after rising 4% in September. The September gain followed a 10.1% drop month-to-month in August. These have been extremely volatile times for orders.

    Sequential order patterns- Sequentially orders are up 5.8% over 12 months; they’re up at a 14.2% annual rate over six months but now they’re falling by 0.4% over three months. Foreign orders show a continuing strong and even accelerating trend with orders up by 13.7% over 12 months, then rising at a 25.4% annual rate over six months, stepping up to a 36.5% annual rate over three months. In contrast, domestic orders fall by 5.3% over 12 months but then trim that rate of decline to -1.5% at an annual rate over six months. However, over three months German real domestic orders are falling at a 38.5% annual rate. As you can see, the weak domestic orders and the strong foreign orders nearly cancel one another out with an overall order result of minus 0.4% over three months.

    Sales trends- Sales trends show a little bit more stability but still some volatility. Here we will focus on total manufacturing sales. Manufacturing sales fell by 1.2% in October after falling by 1.1% in September; in August real manufacturing sales had risen by 3%. I will not detail the growth rates here; you’ll find them in the table. However, looking at sales growth rates for consumer goods, consumer durables, consumer nondurables, capital goods, and intermediate goods, you see across each one of these sectors a significant amount of volatility in sales month-to-month from August to September to October.

    Sequential real sales- Sequentially manufacturing sales fall by 3.8% over 12 months; they step-up to a decline of 5.5% at an annual rate over six months and then, over three months, there’s a turnaround in the trend as real sales rise at a 2.6% annual rate. Overall consumer goods, capital goods, and intermediate goods show declines in sales over 12 months and over six months. Over three months, consumer goods sales make a small decline, while capital goods sales surge at an 11.4% annual rate, and intermediate goods sales rise at a 4.2% annual rate. The turnaround and stability to overall real sales by sector owes substantially to capital goods, and to some extent intermediate goods, where sales have firmed up over the last three months after having a legacy of declines over six months and 12 months.

    Europe – Beyond Germany The bottom of the table looks at industrial confidence readings from the European Commission for Germany, France, Italy, and Spain. All the readings for the last three months are negative readings and for each of the countries there’s a deterioration in October compared to September. All countries also showed deterioration from August to September. Spain in September is an exception. The sequential readings from 12-months to six-months to three-months show German industrial readings are negative and getting worse in each horizon. Italian readings are negative and getting worse on each shortened horizon as well. French readings are negative over 12 months; they’re worse over six months but then improve by just a tick over three months compared to six-month readings. For Spain, readings are negative and all the periods; however, they improve over six months compared to 12-months and then they improve again over three months compared to six-months although these improvements are stepwise small changes.

    Quarter-to-date- The quarter-to-date readings show that orders are increasing early in the fourth quarter at a 7.5% annual rate. Foreign orders are surging at a 43.6% annual rate and domestic orders are contracting at a 32.1% annual rate. Total manufacturing sales are falling at a 5.6% annual rate in Germany with consumer goods sales rising 2.6% at an annual rate. Intermediate goods sales are up at a 2.3% annual rate and capital goods sales are falling at a 1.6% annual rate.

    Europe’s rankings- For the industrial data, I present the queue standings for Germany, France, Italy, and Spain. We see Germany with the lowest industrial queue standings in their bottom 5.6 percentile. France stands in its 12.5 percentile; Italy stands in its 18.4 percentile; Spain has the relative strongest readings with a 32.7 percentile standing which puts Spain as the strongest respondent in the table even though in the lower third of its own historic queue of industrial readings. All of these are extremely weak readings, and these are the four largest economies in the European Monetary Union.

  • Overview: “MIXED” at weak levels of activity- The S&P composite PMI readings for November continue to show a mixed bag of activity globally among the 25 national jurisdictions in the table. The average reading in November slipped to 51.7 from 51.9 in October; the median reading slipped 51.7 in November from 51.8 in October. There are 7 reporting jurisdictions with diffusion readings below ‘50’ indicating a contraction in overall economic activity in November, the same number as in October but down from a count of 12 in September. The breadth of slowing in November is at 44%, which is more slowing than in October, when only 24% of the reporters were slowing month-to-month. But both of those readings are much stronger than in September when 84% of the reporting units slowed down on a month-to-month basis.

    Reading this table: In addition to summary data at the bottom of the table to provide some numerical benchmarking to the indications in the table (below), I use color-coding and shading to indicate other trends. The month-to-month or the period-to-period changes in activity are flagged by the word ‘better’ or ‘worse’ with ‘worse’ appearing in red and ‘better’ appearing in black to create an easier visual image of how countries are doing over these time horizons. Shading is used to reveal rankings below ‘50’ for diffusion data. Diffusion readings below 50 indicate contraction. At a glance, we can see that the weakness is really concentrated in the large western economies with the European Monetary Union, specifically, Germany and France, and sporadically, Italy, showing a proliferation of below ‘50’ readings. Sweden, Russia, and Australia have below ‘50’ readings in September but have since shaken those off in subsequent months. Zambia and Egypt have been consistently below ‘50’ readings and Nigeria is in that same club except for its 12-month average. Kenya and Ghana had a below ‘50’ reading in September but have since shaken those off.

    Queue standings are WEAK! - The queue standing data take the diffusion readings and place them in a queue of data over nearly the last five years. The far-right hand column labeled “queue %” provides these standings. The benchmark here is that a standing of 50% identifies the median for the period so any reading above 50% is above its five-year median; anything below 50% is below its five-year median. I color-code these to make them easier to summarize at a glance with the below 50% readings in red in the above 50% in readings in black. Fourteen of the 25 readings have standings below their approximate 5-year medians. This weakness is concentrated in large economies with the U.S. as a clear exception having a 66.7 percentile standing, but the European Monetary Union, Germany, France, and Italy all have standings below their 50th percentile, as does the United Kingdom. In Asia, Japan and China have standings that are slightly below their respective 50th percentiles.

    The bigger they are, the harder they fall? - The largest economies are having the biggest problem shaking off the weakness in the wake of COVID and in the wake of their COVID policies. Sequential data that compare three-month, six-month, and 12-month periods and the changes in activity over those periods show that the overall average has really been quite static although there is a very slight erosion in play with the overall average at 51.9 over 12 months slipping to 51.8 over six months and to 51.7 over three months. This is sequential hair-splitting weakness. The median values follow in step with a median of 51.3 for the 12-month average, slipping to 51.1 for the six-month average and staying at 51.1 for the three-month average of the cross-section median values. Over 12-to-6-to-3 months, the number of jurisdictions below ‘50’ fluctuates between 6 and 7; across these periods, there is not much change. Beyond the sequential movements of the average and the median, we can look at the percent slowing; the percent slowing has been creeping up. Over 12 months 43.5% of the reporting units are slowing, over six-months 60.9% of them are slowing, and over three months 78.3% of them are slowing. While the aggregate data on medians and averages show only a very slight erosion across jurisdictions, the count of areas where activity is actually slowing has actually been rising demonstrably.

  • Money growth is accelerating globally as money growth is positive over 12 months in all countries in the table as money supply completes the transition from contracting to expanding in the wake of the Covid disruption. European Monetary Union money growth is up by 2.6% over 12 months, U.S. money growth is up by 3.1%, U.K. money growth is up by 3.4%, and Japan's M2 plus CDs is up by 1.2% over the last year.

    In the United States and the euro area both show money growth accelerating from 12-months to six-months to three-months. The U.K. shows fairly steady increases in the growth rate of money supply with a slight step down over six months; that then has speeded up over three months. Japan's money growth shows positive growth rates over each horizon without a clear trend developing from 12-months to 3-months.

    In inflation-adjusted terms (or real terms), the euro area shows accelerating money supply growth. The U.S. shows the same trend with money growth picking up from 12-months to six-months and then holding that higher growth rate over three months. In the United Kingdom, real money supply growth is slowing - but only very slightly. Japan's real money supply growth shows contractions over 12 months, over six months, and over three months. Japan doesn't exactly show a trend but the declines over three and six months are deeper than the annual rate decline over 12 months.

    The euro area shows positive credit growth in nominal terms over three months, six months, and 12 months. In real terms, the euro area shows positive credit growth over three months and six months, after shaking off a decline over 12 months.

    The year-over-year chart of money growth shows some clear trends for money growth where the U.S., the euro area, and the U.K. demonstrate clear accelerating trends in money growth are underway. For Japan, money growth continues on a very long and slow decelerating path that dates back to 2021 and then shows a slight pick up the pace of deceleration in 2024.