UK GDP Is Officially A Train Wreck Impact Of GDP-Gap To Become A More Serious Matter For Argumentation
Summary
‘Official’ train wreck?? Maybe I shouldn’t say ‘officially’ since no one in officialdom has really declared it so. And I don’t want those with policies at Lloyds to come running for remuneration because they are insured against injury [...]
‘Official’ train wreck?? Maybe I shouldn’t
say ‘officially’ since no one in officialdom has really declared it so.
And I don’t want those with policies at Lloyds to come running for
remuneration because they are insured against injury inflicted by a
train gone amok. Still, the sharp downward revision to UK GDP is
stunning and it gives us a new take on reality.
Capital spending takes a dive – If capital
spending were a prize-fighter, the boxing officials would be streaming
in for an investigation of such a sudden dive. UK capital spending in
Q1 ‘did in’ an already weak UK GDP showing in 2009-Q1 by falling at an
even steeper 27% annual rate. The annualized drop in UK GDP as a result
has sunk back to near double digit losses, showing a decline of at a
pace of 9.3% compared to -7.3% as last reported. And, yeah, they are
both bad numbers, but 9.3% is simply awful.
Bigger than a pot-hole: The GDP hole that
the UK must dig itself out of is deeper than we thought. And in this,
the UK is not alone. Not seasonally adjusted Irish GDP was revised
lower in Q1 to an annual rate drop of 8.5% from 7.5% previously.
Excluding its key international sector, Ireland’s GDP fell 12% in Q1.
Downward revisions have been an ongoing theme…
Yes we have no INFLATION!!! (for now) --
These sorts of downward revisions business activity help to explain
some of the other ‘news du jour’ such as the lowest inflation rate in
40 years in Italy (+0.5% Yr/Yr in June); the first-time-ever drop in
the EMU CPI (-0.1% in the twelve months ended in June); and, the lowest
inflation reading in at least 38 years for the OECD area (+0.1% Yr/Yr
in May).
Let’s do the twist...or let’s not -- There
has been some great twisting of inflation trends recently. As short a
time ago as July of 2008 OECD inflation had reached an 11-year high at
4.9% Yr/Yr; the plunge in the rate of inflation has a lot to do with
the global credit crisis and the deflating of the individual OECD
economies as well as the global economy. To the extent we may wish to
consider it a separate event, it also has to do with oil prices
falling. Energy prices in the OECD fell by 16.2% in the 12 months to
May obviously having a lot to do with the drop in that headline
inflation rate. That which twists can untwist…
The GDP-Gap trap - These huge hits to GDP
are behind us. The legacy of those hits is something economists call
the GDP-Gap. The Gap is the difference between where GDP is currently
compared to where it could have been had the economy grown at its
‘full-potential’. You get a good simple approximation of this by just
extending GDP’s growth trend before the economy slowed and fell and
looking at the resulting gap of that extrapolated line Vs actual GDP.
That gap will persist for some time into the future even if the economy
grows swiftly for several quarters.
The plot thickens - While no one expects
declines of the past order of magnitude to continue going forward,
there is considerable debate about the speed of the individual
economies and of the global economy. The turning point location for GDP
growth rates to become positive and the pace at which growth will
proceed once that happens are critical ingredients in the outlook for
inflation.
Risk source: Gap trap Vs central bankers at nap -
To Keynesian types these issues are the key; to others ‘the Gap’ is
still an issue that matters but monetarists look for the impact on
inflation to come from all the special reserve injections by various
central banks.
Market pricing, or groping - So the stage
is set. We can expect these issues to continue to be contentious as the
recession slows and recoveries re-start. Stock markets have rebounded
less on the expectation of strong GDP recovery growth rates and more on
the notion that huge drops in GDP are behind us and the companion
thought that at least some growth lies ahead. Bonds have been battered
back by those with fears of inflation from central-bank reserve growth
and the notion that the special times for distress pricing and the
flight to quality are behind us.
Markets will continue to toss and turn on these issues. Some
will revel in the existence of the GDP-Gap as a protector against
inflation. Others will dismiss it or diminish it. It is the wave of the
future.
UK GDP | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Consumption | Capital Formation | Domestic | ||||||
GDP | Private | Public | Total | Housing | Exports | Imports | Demand | |
% change Q/Q | ||||||||
Q1-09 | -9.3% | -5.0% | 0.9% | -26.9% | -41.5% | -25.0% | -24.1% | -9.5% |
Q1-09 Previous | -7.3% | -4.7% | 1.2% | -14.2% | #N/A | -22.1% | -21.5% | -7.6% |
Q4-08 | -7.0% | -4.3% | 4.3% | -4.7% | -12.7% | -15.6% | -20.2% | -8.7% |
Q3-08 | -2.9% | -1.5% | 1.9% | -10.7% | -25.6% | -1.7% | -2.8% | -3.1% |
Q2-08 | -0.2% | -1.5% | 4.0% | -8.8% | -21.9% | -1.8% | -5.3% | -1.2% |
% change Yr/Yr | ||||||||
Q1-09 | -4.9% | -3.1% | 2.8% | -13.2% | -26.2% | -11.6% | -13.6% | -5.7% |
Q4-08 | -1.8% | -0.8% | 3.5% | -7.8% | -15.9% | -3.8% | -7.7% | -2.9% |
Q3-08 | 0.5% | 0.7% | 2.6% | -3.9% | -14.8% | 0.5% | -1.7% | 0.1% |
Q2-08 | 1.8% | 1.4% | 2.9% | -0.8% | -8.6% | 2.8% | 3.5% | 2.2% |
5-Yrs | 0.9% | 1.2% | 1.8% | 0.7% | -5.1% | 1.7% | 1.1% | 0.8% |
Robert Brusca
AuthorMore in Author Profile »Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media. Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.