data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f86f4/f86f450c7226fe56ac8c03cc96f30f1fbcbc7e89" alt=""
Composite PMIs Largely Erode in September
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d917f/d917fb49ffd7f6a99889af848eb1ec224ca01650" alt="20221005A.jpg"
Composite PMIs in September largely eroded. The average PMI reading in September fell to 50.9 from 51.1 in August although the median PMI rose to 50.9 in September from 50.5 in August. In September there are eight jurisdictions with readings lower than 50, indicating an overall contraction in the economy. The September reading is a lower number than the 10 that reported contractions in August. Eleven jurisdictions reported slowing conditions in September, compared to 18 in August. These figures account for month-to-month deterioration and while the number 11 is smaller than the number18, the number 11 follows the number of 18 indicating that that were 18 deteriorating in August and in addition to that there are 11 deteriorations in September. There were also 17 deteriorations back in July. The number of deteriorations may have slowed but the accumulated effect clearly is a worsening.
For the most part, the PMI data haven't showed too much change over the last three months, but there is generally speaking weakness in place. Comparing September to July, the average is weaker, the median is weaker, and we have a long string of jurisdictions below 50 and of entities reporting slowing growth.
Looking at sequential growth rates from 12-months to six-months to three-months, there's also a clear erosion going on in the average and then the median. On this timeline, the jurisdictions below 50 progressed from 4 over 12 months and six months to 7 over three months and the number of jurisdictions showing slowing progressed from 3 over 12 months to 16 over six months and to 17 over three months.
Percentile standing depicts how weak these numbers really are when placed in an historic context. We tend to look at PMI data by evaluating readings relative to the 50 mark, since 50 represents the dividing line between an economy that's expanding or contracting. When we do that, we distance ourselves from what the normal readings are for these PMI values and turn the PMI into a binary signal. The percentile standings take a different approach. They position each one of these readings for September in a queue of data over the last 4 ½ years. On that basis, the average PMI reading has a the 37th percentile standing in its range and the median reading is in the 31st percentile of its range. The median reading for each country will occur at a value of 50%. So, when we find that the average reading for these countries is at the 37th percentile and the median of these pooled readings is at the 31st percentile, we are seeing readings that are in the lower one-third of their range of values indicating some extreme weakness. There may still be expansion taking place, but it is weak expansion. In fact, there are only 6-jurisdictions with percentile standings at or above their 50th percentile in the table. The strongest of these is Singapore at its 94th percentile. That's followed by the UAE at its 85th percentile. That's followed by Zambia at its 82nd percentile. Japan is at its 66th percentile, followed by Saudi Arabia at its 64th percentile. Brazil sits on the cusp at its 50th percentile, right at its median value for this period.
And some of the larger economies have extremely low standings. For example, the United States has a lower 10% standing, the EMU has a lower 12% standing, Germany has a lower 7% standing, the U.K. has a lower 10% standing.
There's a great deal of weakness indicated by the composite PMIs and these are the results of the manufacturing and services PMIs for each country. These composites are very broad gauges of economic activity. The average rating over 12 months is a diffusion reading of 53.5 that has slipped the 51.2 over three months and to 50.9 in the current month. The median reading has slipped from 53.5 over 12 months to 50.5 over three months and stands at 50.9 as of September. These measures have aggregate activity showing barely any growth at all. So, it’s growth; but it is not normal.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/756a7/756a7c4877fc99ed4cfeda722fdb1c2c9a33d522" alt="221005t1.png"
Today the WTO offered a forecast for a substantial slide in World Trade growth. The global economy is slowing down. There's a war in Ukraine. It is becoming more dangerous by the minute as Ukraine wins and Russia goes back on its heels and threatens to use nuclear weapons as it uses sham elections to annex parts of Ukraine that it previously occupied and is currently in the process of abandoning. Central banks are raising interest rates to try to push inflation back. Globally inflation is running far too hot. It's a very difficult time for policymakers and markets are showing a great deal of anxiety over how soon inflation will be eradicated, how high interest rates will rise, and over concerns about growth. This anxiety has been hammering global equity markets. As of the September data, the situation continues to deteriorate.
Robert Brusca
AuthorMore in Author Profile »Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media. Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.