Composite PMI Trend Remains Mixed; Large Economies Improve
The S&P composite PMI tracks economic performance across manufacturing and services sectors for a group of 25 countries; it shows mixed performance in December with conditions slightly slowing for just over half of the reporters. However, among the larger economies, conditions are largely improving with the United States improving and with the European Monetary Union improving in December, including the large individual members of the union: Germany, France, Italy, and Spain. Japan also improves month-to-month in December although among large economies the U.K. economy worsens and worsens for the third month in a row. Condions in China also deteriorate.
The U.S. shows composite conditions improving over 12 months, six months, and three months based on averages, as does Ireland, and Sweden, and Hong Kong. Worsening consistently from 12-months to six-months to three-months is only India. In the case of India, this is a slowing from extremely high readings as the percentile standing for India's composite in December is in its 71.9 percentile tying it for the fourth highest percentile ranking in this sample of countries over the last five years.
While there was still a great deal of slowing, there wasn't that much contraction going on in this group of countries. Only 6 composite readings are below 50, indicating contractions in December compared to seven in November and October. Over three months averages show only 7 contracting; over six months, eight are contracting; and over 12 months six are contracting. In terms of percentile standings, however, 15 of the 25 reporters in the table show relative standings below their medians over the last five years so relative weakness is the rule although contraction is not.
The unweighted average for the sample is for a composite PMI reading of 51.8 which shows a bare-bones expansion. The unweighted U.S., U.K., and European Monetary Union average is at 51.8, the G-7 weighted average is at 52.8, while the G-6 average, that excludes the U.S., is at 48.9. The G-7 weighted average has a 52.6 percentile standing over the last five years while the G-6 GDP-weighted average has only a 29.8 percentile outstanding emphasizing the strength that the U.S. economy imparts to any measure of the performance of the most advanced economies.
Ranked over the last five years, only 10 economies have standings above their medians for this period. The median for the whole sampler is at a 43.9 percentile standing; the average is at a 48.6 percentile standing- there's currently still a great deal of weakness among these countries. The weakest standing in the sample is for France at a 21.1 percentile standing with Singapore's 24.6 percentile standing running a close second, the U.K. ranks third worst at 26.3 percentile, and Ghana's 28.1 percentile standing is in 4th place.
There's little evidence of trend as the chart above shows. The G-7 reading over 12 months, six months, and three months is locked in a narrow range between 52.2 and 52.6; the G-6 range is lower but also narrow between 49.0 and 49.9. The overall average fluctuates between 51.8 for three months and 52.0 over 12 months. For the most part, we're getting readings that are in the growth category but simply not very impressive and readings that are quite low by the standards set over the last five years which was by itself or relatively listless.
Robert Brusca
AuthorMore in Author Profile »Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media. Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.