IFO Makes Slight Improvement Except for Services
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ced7/9ced796d6947d6933d4939317b7a838649ea5b9d" alt=""
The IFO index in February produced improvements for all environmental assessments: climate, current conditions, and expectations. Conditions in Germany improved even if only slightly across all four of five industry groups- all except services. Improving were manufacturing, construction, wholesale, and retail. Each improved for climate, for current conditions, and for expectations. However, in each case conditions worsened for services climate saw its services diffusion reading fall to -4.3 in February from -2.2 in January, current conditions saw the services current conditions reading fall to 10 from 13.9, and expectations saw the services expectations conditions reading fall to -17.7 from -17.
It's unusual to see something like this happen, especially with two dedicated readings for services subsectors, wholesaling and for retailing, improving in each of the three categories of climate, current conditions, and expectations. However, conditions have been weak in Germany for quite a long time and the services sector has been the only sector with positive current conditions readings for some time; it may be that after all this pulling that the services sector has done, it has run out of gas and now the pulling in the opposite direction by manufacturing, construction, wholesaling, and retailing is taking its toll on services.
The rankings continue to produce low readings and although the diffusion readings for services are the highest in each category services, looked at on a percentile standing basis on data back the late-1991, reveals the sector to have the weakest climate ranking; It has the 2nd weakest current conditions ranking, and it has the weakest expectations ranking among all industry groups.
As always, it's hard to tell how this is going to play out. Manufacturing tends to be the cutting edge; it is the sector with volatility that tends to move down the soonest when the economy is weakening and move up the fastest when the economy is strengthening. But, right now, there's not a whole lot of trend going on for any of the sectors. The chart at the top shows that there has been stability for most of the sectors with the exception of services where the chart plots a gradual erosion in progress.
Among the IFO reading, the only reading that stands above its median reading on data back to 1991 is the construction sector with a 59.5 percentile standing for current conditions. Any reading above the 50th percentile is above its median. Retailing is one of the sectors that comes close to doing this, also for current conditions, with a reading at its 48.2 percentile, closing in on that neutral 50% mark.
Conditions in Germany remain touch and go; there remains political stability in the country where national elections are pending. In the euro area, there has been a lot of political reversals for long entrenched national parties. Europe displays a good deal of uncertainty particularly regarding recent U.S. policies that have pressured Europe over some of its past conduct and where a new system of support for Ukraine is in the offing. The times they are a changin.’
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a0ad/9a0ad37b93b74c99425bd2a287254975e2406281" alt=""
Robert Brusca
AuthorMore in Author Profile »Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media. Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.