IP Struggles in EMU
Manufacturing output in the European Monetary Union (EMU) continues to show countries struggling to make sustained gains. In the table, EMU members are early reporters of IP data. Manufacturing statistics in August show five of those thirteen countries have declining output. In July, six of them showed declines; in June, five showed declines. Slightly more than half of the reporters do show increases on a month-to-month basis. But the margin between the number with output increasing and decreasing is not impressive. The median increase among these members in August shows IP up by 0.2%, in July the median increase was 0.4%, the same as in June. Despite the mixed nature of these statistics, the median on balance shows consistent monthly increases in output in June, July, and August. However, over these same months, the proportion of reporters showing output accelerating is generally disappointing. In June about 54% of the reporters show output accelerating, in July that fell back to 38.5%, in August that proportion improved only slightly to 41.7%. In each of the last two months, fewer than half of the reporters were showing an acceleration in output.
Sequential data details Sequential data that look at these same countries’ annualized output growth over 12 months, six months and three months show more seriously mixed and weak economic conditions. Over three months, seven of the thirteen reporters show declines in output. Over six months, eight reporters show a decline in output, and over 12 months, seven of the reporters show a decline in output. Once again, the split between the number of countries reporting output increases and decreases is only a narrow margin, but on these horizons, there are slightly more countries reporting declines than increases.
Sequential trends Not surprisingly, the sequential data show median output changes with declines. Over 12 months, the median decline rate is -0.7%, over six months it's almost the same, at -0.6%, but over three months the output decline worsens to -4.1%. These are all based on data surveyed at an annual rate. If we look at the underlying trend for output over 12 months, 75% of the reporters show output accelerating, but over six months only 33.3% show output accelerating, and over three months only 45.5% show output accelerating.
The bottom line for manufacturing output in the EMU is that monthly conditions are mixed, and the broader sequential data are showing more weakness and more of a tendency to weakness.
Quarter-to-date The quarter-to-date shows seven monetary union economies with output declining; this is two-months into the third quarter. There is some strength, but the strongest reporter is Ireland where output data are notoriously volatile; still in the quarter-to-date, Irish output is up at a 50% annual rate; output in Finland shows a 14% annual rate increase; Belgium shows about a 13% annual rate increase. Those are encouraging numbers; however, on the negative side, there are double-digit growth rates posted by Luxembourg, Malta, Greece, and Portugal. For the most part, these are small or middle-sized European economies, but Europe's largest economy, Germany also shows a quarter-to-date decline in output at a 7% annual rate, with Italy, the 3rd largest economy, showing a 6.7% decline in output at an annual rate. Spain in the EMU’s 4th largest economy; it shows output declining at a 7.5% annual rate. Among the big four European economies, only France with output up at a 1.6% annual rate has an increase in the quarter-to-date.
IP growth is undernourished Growth rates for industrial production are generally below par with the average growth rate; on data back to 2006 at the average percentile rank standing for output growth across these countries is 39.5%. That compares to a median ranking at a 42-percentile standing. Both these calculations show that the average or median growth rate for these 13 countries is weak. The representative growth rate for this group is below the countries’ respective medians for the period. In August, only Belgium, Malta, Ireland, and Greece have percentile standings for their growth rates year-over-year that are in excess of the ranking of 50% putting them above their historic medians. By comparison, the BIG-4 economies in the monetary union show growth rates that rank much weaker in their historic profiles. Listed by the relative size of their economies, Germany has a growth rate with a 20.5 percentile standing, France has a growth rate with a 43.3 percentile standing, Italy has a growth rate with a 15.6 percentile standing and Spain has a growth rate with a 25.4 percentile standing. The BIG-4 economies are relatively much weaker than the rest of the monetary union.
Momentum In terms of momentum, the large economies are split with Germany showing an acceleration in output culminating in a growth rate of 7.9% at an annual rate over three months. France shows the same tendency with weak growth rates over six months and 12 months progressing to a 10.4% annual rate of growth over three months. Italy, however, shows slippage with growth rates that are negative on all horizons and with the largest negative growth rate at -7.7% over three months. Spain also shows a progression towards weakness. Spain's progression is severe with output falling 3.7% over 12 months, falling at a 19.4% annual rate over six months and plunging at a 27.1% annual rate over three months.
Conditions in the monetary union remain mixed with a clear tilt toward weakness and with countries generally showing manufacturing sectors that are producing weaker than average results compared to historic performance.
Robert Brusca
AuthorMore in Author Profile »Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media. Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.