S&P Composite PMIs Improve on Better Service Sectors
The Baltic Dry Index continues to signal ongoing improvement in global trade
Standard and Poor’s composite PMI readings for August improved globally in 19 of 25 reporting countries. This widespread improvement showed far better improvement in breadth than what has been registered by manufacturing sectors among countries that report those data.
The August result was far better than July when only 10 of 25 reporting countries improved month-to-month. Similarly, June was a weak month with only seven composite PMIs improving month-to-month.
Despite the strong improvement in August, the three-month average finds improvement compared to six-months ago in only 7 reporting units. However, the sequential averages also have a stronger history as the six-month average shows that only 6 reporting units were weaker compared to 12-month averages. The three-month comparison is to a six-month period that saw broad gains. Even so, the 12-month comparison to 12-months ago shows improvement in only 12 of the reporting units, approximately half of them.
Over 12 months, most large/developed economies performed worse including the United States, the European Monetary Union, specifically, Germany, France, Italy, and Spain, as well as Japan. China worsened as well. The United Kingdom was an exception, improving over 12 months compared to 12-months ago.
The unweighted average PMI readings for a group, consisting of the U.S., the U.K., and the European Monetary Union, shows steady improvement from June, to July, to August. Despite uneven sequential results the unweighted average PMIs also have improved from their 12-month averages to their six-month average, to their three-month average.
The BRIC countries excluding Russia (BIC) show steady monthly improvements and show consistent, strong readings above or just below the 55 mark for over three months, six months, and 12 months.
The overall averages of the PMI readings show a tendency to increase but not a clear sequential move in that direction. The overall median readings show the same general reading and trend.
On a composite PMI basis, the number of areas with readings below 50, indicating overall economic contraction, have been reduced to four in August. They total 4 over three months and six months compared to 6 over 12 months. Few economies are showing overall contraction on this measure. While there were as many as eight contracting in July and in June, generally over three and six months the number showing contraction has been small.
The far-right hand column gives the queue percentile standings which place the August readings in an ordered queue of standings in the last 4 ½ years of data. These readings show 12 reporters with current standings below the 50% mark. A reading below 50 would put them below their median over this span. The average reading for the entire group is for a queue standing at 51.8% while the median is at 51.0%. Over this period the 12 readings that are below 50% are simply below their respective medians reading; they do not indicate contraction because these are rankings based on queue standings rather than diffusion data as in the first six columns of data in the table.
Summing up The bottom line is that a global economy is being held aloft by its service sector which continues to plug away while manufacturing has been weaker and struggling. The outlook depends importantly on what central bank policy does, and central banks are watching inflation developments closely. Inflation, that had spiked during the COVID, settled down and opened the door for central banks to start easing programs. Which was done in most money center countries. However, inflation progress has stopped. Meanwhile, global geopolitical tensions, risks and warfare remain in play obscuring the outlook as escalation is a palpable threat to the outlook.
Robert Brusca
AuthorMore in Author Profile »Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media. Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.