Haver Analytics
Haver Analytics

Introducing

Robert Brusca

Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media.   Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.

Publications by Robert Brusca

  • Japan's Economy Watchers index eased in March, falling to 49.8 from 51.3 in February. The index indicates the slightest contraction underway in March, as well as a step down from its February reading. The future index also edged lower in March, but it continues to point to expansion (or expected future improvement) with a 51.2 diffusion reading. This is weaker than the 53.0 reading in February, but it’s above 50, indicating expansion. The assessment of current employment situation in March strengthened slightly to 52.5 from 52.2 in February. Both employment readings show modest net advances for employment since the diffusion readings are above 50.

    Current index- The current index shows a slew of declines over three months, six months, and 12 months. Housing is an exception over all horizons while employment is an exception over six months. Still, diffusion values are above 50 in 5 of 9 current components, but diffusion is below 50 for the headline. That means most components are showing expansion; the headline is just a few ticks below signaling static growth conditions. At the far right, the column ‘queue standing’ is presented. These metrics are different; they rank the diffusion data over all diffusion values back to March 2002. On the queue standing data, any value above 50% is above its median on that timeline. Note that all current readings are above their respective medians except employment (40.7%).

    Future index- The future reading shows a decline in diffusion month-to-month in March, but across components there is more weakening compared to February values (8 of 9). In January, all components improved as well as the headline, except for services. Over three months and six months, three components weakened month-to-month (eating and drinking places, services, and employment). In addition, over 3-month manufacturing weakened. All components and the headline weakened over 12 months. The diffusion values in March find the future components largely over 50 (6) compared to a few (3) below 50. Most industries see future improvement; the exceptions are for housing, manufacturing, and for employment (diffusion below 50 in March). The queue standings for the future index show housing and employment below the median value of ‘50%.’ Employment is below a queue ranking of 50% in the current reading as well as in the future reading, not a good development. At least the current employment diffusion reading is still above 50% (52.5).

    In Japan’s Tankan report manufacturing is the bellwether. For the Economy Watchers, it may be ominous that manufacturing has a current diffusion value at 47.8, and a queue standing only at its 54th percentile. The future index for manufacturing is also below 50 (49.4) but with a firmer-looking queue standing in its 62nd percentile. In contrast, nonmanufacturing readings are above 50 with 70th to 80th percentile standings. But these are not Japan’s bellwethers in the Tankan. The Tankan also focuses on the performance of large firms, a division we do not see here.

    The chart shows current future and current employment readings coalescing around a diffusion value of 50 (unchanged output or employment). ‘Unchanged’ has a relatively high queue standing back to 2003 judging from the standing of the current headline. It is hard to get a clear reading on momentum from the chart. For now, Japan’s growth and outlook are adequate and expanding. Conditions are largely better than they have been. But when the headline reading of diffusion at 49.8 has a queue standing in its 68th percentile, you know the comparison is with a weak history. The same is true for the future readings. The Economy Watchers index may be adequate, but it is not impressive in March.

  • Germany
    | Apr 08 2024

    German IP Shows Some Push

    German industrial production had revived in the last two months, rising by 2.1% month-to-month in February after rising by 1.3% in January. December production had fallen by 2% month-to-month. The upshot is that the 12-month growth rate for production is still showing a decline of 4.8%; over six months, the change in production shows a gain of 0.4% at an annual rate, while over three months, it moves up to 5.6% at an annual rate - quite a strong pace. Overall production in the quarter-to-date is rising at a 5% annual rate. Taking a much more distant benchmark, we compare the level of output today to what it was in January 2020 before COVID struck and find it's still lower by 8%. This is very definitely a short-term revival as the longer-term trends are still weak. The chart explores the year-over-year growth rates by sector for German output.

    Output by sector Output by sector shows gains in each sector in February and gains in two of three sectors in January, the exception being capital goods where a 1.5% gain in February is compared to a 1.5% drop in January. All three sectors, consumer goods, capital goods, and intermediate goods show declines in December. The sequential growth rates that compare the annual rate of growth over 12 months to six months to three months find consumer goods output ramping up at an extremely strong pace from -1.8% over 12 months to a 21% annual rate over three months. Capital goods output shows some improvement, but it then runs out of gas; capital goods output is down at a 7.6% annual rate over 12 months; that's reduced to 4.5% annual rate drop over six months but then worsens ever-so-slightly to a 4.9% drop over three months. Intermediate goods get back on-theme with sequential acceleration in output, progressing from a -4.6% growth rate over 12 months, to a +6.5% annual rate over three months.

    Orders, sales, PMI Manufacturing output, orders, and real sales showed increases in February, but both sales and orders declined sharply in January, after having increased in December. Manufacturing output is up for two months in a row. Germany's manufacturing PMI rose in January, but it sank back in February. Manufacturing output is accelerating. Real manufacturing orders are also showing a steady progress higher, although all of their growth rates are still negative. Meanwhile, real sales show contractions over three months, six months and 12 months; the three-month and six-month contractions are larger than the 12-month contraction. The bottom line is that manufacturing output falls into line showing sequential gains, but orders show declines amid sequential improvement, and the real sales lag behind those other gauges.

    Other surveys of Manufacturing and Industry Other manufacturing surveys tell a mixed tale of the last three months. The ZEW survey shows conditions worsening from December, in January and February. The IFO manufacturing gauge shows slight improvements on that timeline; IFO manufacturing expectations also show a slight step up. However, the EU Commission's industry survey shows a progression of deeper weakness. Viewed sequentially, the ZEW survey shows steady erosion from 12-months to six-months with most of that 12- to 6-month deterioration still in-place over three months. The IFO manufacturing gauge weakens sequentially as does the IFO manufacturing expectations reading. The EU Commission index weakens progressively from 12-months to six-months to three-months.

    IP in other Europe Industrial gauges elsewhere in Europe are up to date for Portugal, Spain, France, and Norway. Each of them shows an increase in February compared to January. However, each of those countries also shows a decrease month-to-month in January compared to December. And in December, half of the countries show declines and half of them show increases month-to-month. The experience across Europe obviously has been uneven. Sequential growth rates for industrial production also are uneven. Portugal has an uneven pattern. Spain shows acceleration along with Norway. There is a deteriorating pattern for France. Once again it's a mixed bag of results so we're unable to characterize Europe as doing anything as a whole. European economies still seem to be responding according to their individual circumstances. In the table, of course, Germany, Portugal, Spain, and France are all European Monetary Union members while Norway is not- but even among the monetary union members, we're not seeing the same patterns.

    Q-T-D Quarter-to-date (QTD), Germany shows strong results with overall production rising 5% at an annual rate and only capital goods showing a decline on a Q-T-D basis. Portugal shows a Q-T-D gain in output of 7.4% annualized. Spain logs 13.7% with Norway showing a 1.5% gain. France shows a decline in industrial production on Q-T-D basis with a -3% annual rate reported.

    The Post-Covid wrap-up Post-COVID has been a difficult time for Germany and for Europe. Industrial production in Germany is lower by 8% compared to January 2020 and all the sectors are lower. Manufacturing output in Germany is lower; real manufacturing orders and real sales are lower as well. The indicators from ZEW, the two from the IFO and the EU Commission survey all are lower compared to the January 2020 values. Industrial production across Europe is weaker compared to January 2020 except for Spain showing industrial production stronger by 2.3%. Norway is weaker by only 0.8%, fairly close to unchanged on that timeline.

  • The monthly view: The S&P composite PMIs in March show some continuing but slow improvement. The average for the 24 countries listed on the table moves up to 52.4 in March from 52.0 in February and 51.5 in January. The median moves up to 52.7 in March from 51.3 in February and 50.7 in January. Both the mean and the median progressions show ongoing improvement. Statistical agreement is a beautiful thing. The number of jurisdictions showing composite PMI values below 50 numbered 11 in January, fell to 9 in February, and to six in March. Fewer countries listed in this table are showing overall declining economic activity. In addition to that, few are showing a slowing tendency. Month-to-month changes show only 40% were slowing in January, only 32% were slowing in February, and only 44% of the reporters slowed in March compared to February. The monthly changes are constructive but not dramatic.

    Sequential profile: The sequential changes look at 12-month, to six-month, to three-month changes; they show that averages have risen from 51.6 for the overall, to 51.3 over six months - slightly weaker- and then advancing to 52.0 over three months. The median over 12 months is 51.7, that slips to 50.7 over six months and recovers to 51.8 over three months, just slightly above the 12-month average. Neither the average nor the median shows a steady progression towards improvement, but both show a slightly better reading over three months than over 12 months although the margins of improvement are small. The number of jurisdictions showing declining activity over 12 months is 8, that moves up to 10 over six months and down to 7 over three months. The number of jurisdictions growing slower was over half for 12-months and six-months; over 12 months at 65% slower, and even higher proportion of 78.3% showed slowing over six months compared to 12 months. Over three months, the proportion slowing pulls back sharply to only 34.8%. We see in these trends both the tendency for the PMI to show fewer declines and for the breadth of weakness to pull back over the past year.

    Queue standing- These improvements have had an impact on the queue standings as well. The average queue standing is now at 53.8% with the median at 55.1%. The medians for the composite PMIs are above 50% which means they're above their median values over the last four years. Out of the 24 reporters, only 11 jurisdictions show PMI standings below 50 which means below their median.

    The Weakest vs. the Strongest- The weakest standings in the table in March are standings in the 20th -percentile. Qatar, for example, registers a 20.4 percentile standing. Nigeria is at a 24.5 percentile standing. Germany has a 28.6 percentile standing, with France at a 30.6 percentile standing. The European Monetary Union has a 46.9 percentile standing. The United States has a 42.9 percentile standing. These data suggest that the improvement is not being driven by the large-developed economies. The highest percentile standing in the table belongs to India at the 98th percentile. Brazil has an 81.6 percentile standing. UAE reports an 87.8 percentile standing. Singapore has a 75.5 percentile standing and Japan notches a 73.5 percentile standing.

  • Just the facts ma’am- Inflation has overshot the European Central Bank's target (of 2%) for 33 months in a row. Now, with the unemployment rate in the Monetary Union at 6.5%, the lowest level it's seen since the Monetary Union was formed, the ECB is preparing to cut rates. REALLY!!

    Curiouser and curiouser- I cannot stress enough what a curious situation this is, especially because the ECB, unlike the Federal Reserve, has a mandate that focuses only on inflation and has no reference to growth or to full employment or the unemployment rate.

    Alice in blunderland? It's as though central bankers have stepped through the looking glass and found themselves in a world quite different from the one, they used to inhabit. Once, their principal responsibility was price stability. Suddenly, they seem far more infatuated with preserving low rates of unemployment that in the past proved to be (1) elusive, (2) sustainable, and (3) even dangerous, to pursue. “I was so much older then, I’m younger than that now?” (Dylan excerpt)

    A new low in unemployment or policy judgement? The unemployment rate in the monetary union has been at 6.5% in 11 of the last 12 months. This is the lowest unemployment rate the monetary union has experienced in its existence. In October 2023, there was a hiccup in which the unemployment rate moved up to 6.6% for one month and then it moved back down to 6.5% - hence 11 out of 12 months at 6.5%- hic!

    A festive labor market for all…almost all The table produces statistics for 12 of the oldest EMU members. It shows unemployment rate data ranked from 1994 to date. The unemployment rates for these twelve members are below their medians for every single member except for tiny Luxembourg whose unemployment rate stands at its 78.8 percentile and has been higher only about 21% of the time. By contrast, the monetary union has never seen an unemployment rate lower than this. Belgium has seen an unemployment rate lower than its current 5.5% only 7.6% of the time. Ireland has seen its unemployment rate lower than its 4.2% only 5.5% of the time. France has seen its unemployment rate lower than its 7.4% only 8.1% of the time… and so on. Unemployment rates across the monetary union, where they are not low in absolute values, they are low relative to each country's historic experience. For example, Greece has an 11% unemployment rate; it has been lower than that only 28.5% of the time. Spain's unemployment rate at 11.5% has been lower than that only about 24.4% of the time.

  • Headline inflation is showing signs of behaving in the European Monetary Union (EMU). In March, German inflation saw the monthly change in headline HICP fall by 0.3%, in France it fell by 0.4%, in Spain it fell by 0.4%, while in Italy it rose by 0.1%. The year-over-year increases in the HICP headline inflation rate show a 3% increase in Spain, a 2.4% increase in France, a 2.1% increase in Germany, and a 1.3% increase in Italy. Italy wins the kewpie-doll for attaining its 2% goal first! The target for inflation in the EMU is at 2%; it’s for the whole union. The large economies in the EMU are only starting to bring their respective year-over-year inflation headlines in line with the ECB target. However, the year-over-year inflation rate in the monetary union has been excessive for the last 29-months. That's a lot of overshooting.

  • Japan's Tankan report for the first quarter registered strong readings across the board. The manufacturing assessment for large companies backed off to a +11 in the first quarter of 2024 compared to +13 in the fourth quarter of 2023. Large manufacturers log one of the weaker readings in the report with a queue percentile standing in its 53rd percentile compared to a slew of 90th percentile standings across assorted services sectors. The nonmanufacturing index rose to 34 in Q1 2024 from 32 in Q4 2023 for large companies and it has a 98.7 percentile standing – quite strong. The total industry index was unchanged at 22 in Q1 2024; it has a strong 92-percentile standing. So, what’s the issue?

    The reading for large companies, particularly large manufacturing companies, tends to be the bellwether for this report. Despite widespread strength in the nonmanufacturing readings, the step back in the Q1 manufacturing assessment is a disappointment for the bellwether reading. The current assessment of Q1 at +11 came in one point above expectations while the assessment for the outlook came in one point below what had been expected- hardly earthshaking.

    However, the outlook for manufacturing for the second quarter also showed improvement, moving up to a +10 reading in Q2 2024 from +8 in Q1 2024. For nonmanufacturing, the outlook held at +27 in Q2, the same as in Q1. These two sector readings combined for an all-industry outlook of +19 in Q2 compared to +17 in Q1. Viewed as percentile standings, the manufacturing outlook has a 64-percentile standing which is above its median but not strong. The nonmanufacturing outlook has a 98.7 percentile standing, quite strong and in line with the strong readings produced in the current quarter as well. The all-industry outlook has a standing in its 85th percentile, stronger only about 15% of the time.

    There have been expectations for slightly strong readings from large manufacturers and so for some this is some more disappointing report than simply looking at the numbers. However, the numbers on their face are firm-to-strong and the rankings of the reported figures for the first quarter and for the outlook are solid and for the services sector they're extremely strong. The drop off for the current quarter assessment for large enterprises to +11 from +13 breaks a string of three straight improvements- still the ranking of the reading is above its median. Best of all, expectations are still improving compared to what they were a quarter ago.

    While the survey results for establishment of other sizes are not considered to be a bellwether in this report, for medium-sized firms the manufacturing assessment was unchanged at a +6 in Q1 2024, producing a 70-percentile standing; the manufacturing outlook for Q2 2024 for medium-sized firms held at a +5 which produced a 74.7 percentile standing. For smaller firms, the manufacturing situation was weaker. Small enterprises reported a -1 reading for manufacturing in Q1 2024 after logging a +2 reading in Q4 2023. However, this still has a 60th percentile standing for them, above their historic median. The outlook for manufacturing small firms held at zero in Q2 2024, the same as the first quarter; that reading has a 76-percentile standing. Again, that's well above its median reading (which occurs at a ranking of 50%), and while the standing is solid, it is well short of being construed as strong.

  • The U.K. GDP revision is said to confirm the signal of recession for the economy. I know that markets love to look at the 2 consecutive quarters of negative GDP as a rule that will define the onset of recession. However, I still prefer to view this as only ‘a rule of thumb’ and as an indicative signal not a definitive one. I have included the monthly GDP estimates for the U.K. as the accompanying chart for this discussion. What's clear from that presentation is that GDP growth has been asymptotically approaching zero; even broader charts of quarterly GDP growth show pretty much the same thing with GDP growth sliding down from strong post-COVID recovery growth rates to current growth rates that are closing in on zero. There is no doubt that the U.K. economy is in a period of weakness and under performance. And it may, in fact, be in recession or headed for one; however, at this point if it's a recession that's cropping up, it looks like a rather mild one. The two quarterly growth rates involved for Q3 and Q4 are -0.5% and -1.2% and these are at compounded annual rates. The year-over-year rate for the fourth quarter swing is from +0.2% in Q3 to -0.2% in Q4. That's not really a stark difference.

    U.K. GDP revisions of quarterly rates of growth The GDP revision took Q4 GDP from a decline of 1.4% to a lesser decline of 1.2% in Q4. Private consumption switched from a decline of 0.6% to a decline of 0.2%. Public consumption rose from -1.2% to +0.3%. And there is a welter of other revelations that had impact as well, but one of the more interesting ones is that domestic demand when revised switched from +1.2% to -0.6% (Q/Q annual rate). That's when the shift begins to look a little bit more like a weaker economy of serious dimension. When domestic demand looking at annualized quarterly growth rates falls by 0.6% in Q4 after falling by 2.7% at an annual rate in Q3, that pair of negative growth rates is slightly more damaging than the pair we see for GDP.

    Large trade growth rate revisions Among two of the larger quarterly revisions, exports shifted from a decline of 11% at an annual rate to a decline of 3.1% at an annual rate. Imports were shifted from a decline of 3.2% at an annual rate to a decline of 1.2% at an annual rate. Those are both relatively substantial changes in growth rates. By no stretch of the imagination is the U.K. doing well.

    Some of the best news on the horizon is that the inflation picture has been getting better; it hasn't gotten better fast enough to get the Bank of England to start cutting rates yet.

  • In March, the overall EU Commission index of activity in the EMU rose to 96.3 from 95.5 in February, posting its strongest value since December. March saw gains (or no change) in all five major indexes, a change from February when three of the five sector indexes fell. Also in February, 11 member countries showed declines in sentiment month-to-month compared to only 5 member countries showing declines in their March indexes. The breadth of month-to-month performance improvement in March is more impressive than where the gains have taken the various country or sector indexes compared to historic values.

    Around mid-2020, Italy emerged as having the strongest reading among the four largest economies in the monetary union. Conversely, Germany, beginning around mid-2023, began to lag and has consistently been the weakest economy among the major 4 since that time.

  • Game of Growth: Winter is not coming...it’s just still here German consumer climate edges higher in April. It is still the 15th weakest monthly reading in the last 24-plus years (292 months) of its survey existence. The reading ranks in the lower five-percentile (5.3 percentile) of all readings in the history of survey and is still exceptionally weak. If this is a climate reading, it is still winter in Germany.

    Learning from Germany’s Climate History Readings on this measure were largely positive back to 2000 when the survey began. It logged a series of negative readings (15 months of negative readings) from March 2002 through May 2003; those readings never got weaker than a reading of -3.5.

    Covid brought the next set of negative readings to GfK from May 2020 to September 2021. There were 17 negative months in a row that began with the deep negative reading at -23.1 in May. It repaired to -18.6 in June, progressed to -9.4 in July and rose to a reading of just -0.2 in August 2020, before slipping back into weaker readings as weak as -12 to -15 or so. Negative readings returned in December 2021 before the Ukraine invasion which came in February 2022. GfK did not nosedive immediately, but it weakened from -6.9 in Jan-Feb to -8.5 in March 2022, and then fell to -15.7 in April. The bottom fell out as the index plunged to -26.6 in May 2022.

    Since May 2022, the GfK reading has averages -30.2. On this truncated timeline, the current reading ranks as the eighth strongest. On that ground, the current reading may embody some hope. But it is still mired in deeply negative readings.

    My recitation of German consumer climate history makes it clear that it’s not Covid but the invasion of Ukraine that hit Germany so hard. Of course, that was the second shoe to drop, but it has also been very damaging given German trade links to Russia and German dependence on Russian oil and its gas pipelines.

    The economic and income expectations in GfK are also still weak with readings that rank lower only about 30% of the time in both cases. The propensity to buy ranks lower 20.5% of the time. These components of the GfK index are up-to-date only through March. Both economic and income expectations did improve their monthly rankings by four- to five percentage points in March. The propensity to buy was little change on the month.

    As for Other Europe... Italy and France have confidence readings up-to-date through February. Italy shows some upward momentum; France does not. France’s confidence ranking is weaker than its February level about 30% of the time- like the German components. Italy is much better off with a 76.6 percentile standing. The U.K. reading on confidence is updated through March and has been relatively stable at a 32.3 percentile standing.

    Italy is the outlier here showing more strength than the others although that’s not because of substantially better economic performance. I’d say Italians simply appear to be more resilient. Italian inflation has come down faster than it has elsewhere in Europe. Italian GDP declined early, in Q1 and Q2 of 2023 and has since bounced back strongly in Q3 and Q4 of 2023. But Italy’s retail spending and MFG PMI as well as its conventional industrial production index continue to show weakness and declines. Italy’s unemployment rate also continues to fall but remains well above the EMU rate at 7.2%.

  • United Kingdom
    | Mar 25 2024

    U.K. CBI Survey Offers Mixed Signals

    Retail Sales and Orders- The survey on the U.K. distributive trades by the Confederation of British Industry survey (CBI) offers a mixed outlook on current performance, but one that remains decidedly weak. In March sales compared to a year ago post an improved reading of +2, compared to -7 in February and to a much weaker report for January. Orders compared to a year ago, however, deteriorated in March falling to -22 from -14 in February, but still stronger than their weak January level and above their 12-month average. Sales for the time-of-year, a concept which is essentially a seasonally adjusted gauge, moved up to zero in March from -1 in February; again, they are significantly stronger than their January reading and above their 12-month average.

    Expected Sales and Orders- The March survey also provides expectations for April. April numbers are generally weak and mixed in terms of month-to-month comparisons. Expected sales measured year-over-year in April survey at a net reading of -25 compared to a -15 expectation in March. This is a sharp monthly deterioration but still an improvement from end-of-year values. It is also a weaker reading than the 12-month average. Orders year-over-year improve from March at a -24 reading, stronger than -36 in March. The expected April reading is stronger than the end of year reading but in line with the 12-month average performance for this metric. Expected sales for the time of year improve very marginally in April to -8 from -9; however, that's a significant improvement from end-of-year values and a reading that's slightly better than the 12-month average.

    Metric Rankings- When we assess the retail sales and sales expectations, the results from March and for April have weaknesses. Sales compared to a year ago perform at a 40.8 percentile standing, which is quite weak. Year-over-year orders perform at a 16-percentile standing, while sales for the time-of-year have a 65.5 percentile standing. That's the observation that was flat in March; that performance is slightly better than its historic median performance. However, turning to the expectations for April sales… sales compared to a year ago have an anemic 7-percentile standing, orders compared to a year ago have a 10.5 percentile standing and sales for the time-of-year have a 33.7 percentile standing. All of these are below their historic medians. On balance, while we find some improvement in sales month-to-month - and definite improvement compared to the end of year- the comparisons over the 12-month average are not particularly favorable and the rankings of these index values are quite poor when placed in an historic context.

    Wholesaling Wholesale Sales and Orders- For wholesaling in March, there's broad-based weakness with sales year-over-year, orders year-over-year and sales for the time-of-year all posting negative values compared to positive readings in February. However, the March data once again are stronger than data posted back in January and stronger compared to 12-month averages. The performance of the various measures of sales and orders provides a mixed picture over different horizons.

    Wholesale Expected Sales and Orders- Expectations for April in wholesaling also turned negative for sales compared to a year ago, orders compared to a year ago, and sales for the time-of-year. All these metrics are negative compared to positive values in March although once again they're significantly stronger than their end of year values and their performance is not generally much different from their 12-month averages.

    Metric Rankings in Wholesaling- Assessing wholesaling performance on a ranking format, the current performance of sales compared to a year ago has a 23.9 percentile standing, orders compared to a year ago have a 26-percentile standing, and sales for the time-of-year have a 20-percentile standing. All of these are quite weak and in the neighborhood of a lower 1/4 to 1/5 standing of their respective historic queues of data. Expectations for wholesaling in April stand in their 28th percentile; orders compared to a year ago stand in their 22.8 percentile; sales evaluated relative to the time-of-year stand in their 31.6 percentile. Once again these are weak readings- all of them below their historic medians (below a 50% standing).

  • The German IFO survey made some significant improvements in March compared to February. The all-sector climate reading grows to -16.1 in March from -23.5 in February. The current conditions index registered a positive 0.6 reading in March after a -1.9 rating in February. The expectations index rose to -16.4 in March from -23.0 in February.

    There are some substantial changes and improvements in the month-to-month readings; however, make no mistake about it, the IFO remains very weak. The climate reading, for example, has a rank standing in March at its 19.1 percentile compared to a ranking in at the 6.5 percentile in February. The all-sector current conditions ranking moves up to 13.9 percentile in March from the 11.7 percentile in February. All-sector expectations move up to the 13.4 percentile from the 3.9 percentile in February. These are substantial and significant moves in the month-to-month rankings and for the month-to-month diffusion readings; however, the current readings are still weak. In terms of the values reported last month, the current readings aren't really going to be pointing to an economy that's substantially changed from the readings that we saw a month ago.

    However, what's new and what's interesting is there is a month-to-month improvement and it's the first one of some significant value that we've seen in some time and that could mark a turning point. The change is most substantial for expectations, which is also a relatively volatile category and something to keep an eye on. But it's the fact of having an improvement after such a long period of conditions remaining weak that is both impressive and hopeful.

    Looking at the various sectors in climate section, construction has the strongest ranking in its 25th percentile - a bottom quartile ranking.

    Under current conditions, retail and construction have above-50 percentile standings- above their historic medians. The service sector has the weakest stand-alone ranking in its 15.6 percentile.

    Expectations readings show a still-weak 0.8 percentile standing for construction, just off the all-time low made last month. The service sector, with a 15.1 percentile standing, is the strongest ranking sector in expectations.

  • The S&P composite PMIs in March show broad weakness in Europe with the European Monetary Union composite getting weaker along with its manufacturing and services components. Germany displays the same 3-sector weakness along with France. The United Kingdom shows a weaker headline as well as weakness in services month-to-month, but its manufacturing sector strengthens on a month-to-month basis.

    Japan, on the other hand, shows the strengthening across its composite, manufacturing sector, and services sector. Japan’s composite improves in each of the three months driven by an improvement in the services sector over each of the three months. Japan is the only country in the table to also show the services sector that improves year-over-year, over six months compared to 12 months, and over three months compared to six months. Japan's services sector is quite consistently driving strong improvement and it has a strong queue standing to back that up, in the 90th percentile, the only 90th percentile standing for any sector by any country in the table.

    The U.S., like Japan, shows strength over the last three months. U.S. metrics show strengthening in the composite, the manufacturing sector, and the services sector in each of the last three months. However, despite this string of increases, the three U.S. sectors: the composite, and its components manufacturing, and services all show weakening on balance over three months, six months and 12 months. Note that the monthly data are ‘flash data’ while the sequential data over three months, six months, and 12 months are based on ‘hard data’ and lag by one-month for that reason.

    The queue rankings portrayed by these PMI values, show only Japan's overall composite has a ranking at its 81st percentile driven by that 91st percentile standing in its services sector. Apart from that, the strongest standings are for services in the U.K. and services in the monetary union with 57-percentile standing, a much more modest positioning. The United Kingdom composite has a 53-percentile standing and the U.S. manufacturing sector has a 51-percentile standing, barely above its historic median. All the rest of the sector standings are below their respective 50th percentiles meaning they are below their historic medians on data back to 2020.

    The weakest standings in the table are for manufacturing; the German manufacturing sector has a 14-percentile standing, France has a 22-percentile standing - the same as Japan's - while the monetary union has a 24.5 percentile standing for its manufacturing sector.