Haver Analytics
Haver Analytics

Introducing

Robert Brusca

Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media.   Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.

Publications by Robert Brusca

  • German industrial output advanced in November but is currently riding a string of 18 straight months of year-over-year declines for output excluding construction (the headline series).

    The increase in monthly output marks ‘one in a row,’ two increases in the last four months, and three increases in the last six months. There have been six month-to-month increases in the last 12 months. Still, the year-on-year change is -2.8%, an improvement from drops of five-percent or so in September and October but August of 2024 showed a year-on-year drop of only 2.7%; yet, that was not a signal of coming improvement.

    Apart from output itself, order momentum is not improving. Real manufacturing orders fell by 5.4% in November after falling by 1.5% in October, but that series has risen a strong 7.2% month-to-month in September. Real orders show a progression toward less decline over three months, six months, and 12 months. Still, the quarter-to-date annualized change in real orders is falling at a 7.1% annual rate.

    On balance, it is hard to say that there is any light at the end of the tunnel for German output and its prospects based on IP trends or on real-order trends.

    Sales trends are not much better although real sales rose by 1.4% in November; the decline over three months, six months and 12 months and have ‘generally’ been weakening.

    Surveys show weakened trends from 12-months to 3-months.

    In addition, the queue standings of all the IP categories, orders, real sales and the relevant German surveys have low standings- in all cases below 50%- putting all of them below their historic medians. The surveys are especially weak with standings below the 15th percentile in all cases. Among manufacturing output, real orders, and real sales the strongest standing is orders with a percentile of 33%. For the IP headline series itself, the standing is at its 18.4 percentile; consumer goods is strongest at a standing of 31.2%, with capital goods at 22% and intermediate goods at 17.4%. The readings for manufacturing in Germany are weak no matter how you view them.

    The table also surveys early IP data for Portugal and Norway. These queue standings apply to year-on-year growth rates, and both are above the German standing of 18.4%, with Portugal at 39% and Norway at a 52.7 percentile standing above its historic median.

    The far-right column also assesses the current IP level relative to where it stood on January 2020. The IP headline index is 12 IP index points lower. Construction is 13 index points lower; manufacturing as a total is 10.8 points lower, similar to the drops for real manufacturing orders and for real manufacturing sales. The surveys are on very different scales. The ZEW current index is 81.9 points lower, with the IFO manufacturing index lower by 8.8 points. Despite the difference in the construction of these indexes, these drops both have percentile standings in the 4% to 5% range. Skipping down the table, we quickly see Portugal has fallen by 9.9 IP points compared to its January 2020 level, while Norway has risen by 1.1 point and has an above-median standing, as a result.

    These data are disappointing. Quite apart from the near-term momentum – which is weak- the big picture is severely impacted. And it is not getting better despite a small increase in the November output.

  • The EU Commission index for the EMU area fell in December after remaining steady in November and declining in October. November had seen increases in EMU Commission country-level sentiment readings in all but 15 of the 18 early reporters. However, now, in December, the EU country level readings are falling in 13 of 18 early reporters, including in three of the four largest EMU economies.

    In December, sector readings show that EMU-wide the industrial readings fell sharply, consumer confidence backtracked as retailing and construction were at unchanged readings month-to-month. Strengthening month-to-month was only the service sector reading.

    In terms of standings, the overall EMU standing is at the 24.7 percentile, right at the border of the lower quartile. The industrial sector has a bottom 12.8 percentile standing, with consumer confidence at its 25.4 percentile standing. Services, despite the sector’s rise this month, has only a 35.9 percentile standing. However, retail and construction have standings that are above their respective medians at a 69.4 percentile in retailing and a 72.3 percentile for construction.

    Despite bottom quartile consumer confidence standing, retailing has a 69.4 percentile standing. This seems unusual for retailing to hold up so well despite such weak overall sentiment and such weakness in consumer confidence.

    Country readings show only five are above their historic medians. Only the small EMU nations Cyprus and Lithuania have sentiment standings above their 70th percentile. In contrast, nine countries have percentile standing below their 30th percentiles – including the EMU overall metric.

  • EMU inflation rose by 0.2% in December after gaining 0.1% in November and rising by 0.3% in October. The headline rate is up for three months in a row. The year-on-year pace is 1.7% in September, rises to 2.0% in October, to 2.3% in November, and then to 2.5% in December. These are small changes to be sure, but it is a clear adverse trend.

    EMU-wide core inflation fell from 3.3% year-over-year in February 2024 to 2.9% in March 2024. For March onward, the core rate has fluctuated between 2.8% and 3.0% - nine months running with the December core reading as yet unavailable.

    While headline inflation appears to be toeing the line on inflation, the core is stuck nearly a percentage point higher. But growth in the EMU area is weak and the ECB has been cutting rates largely without opposition in this environment.

    The trends are more convoluted. In the table, the country level data among large EMU members shows headline HICP rates are accelerating over three months compared to six months. In Germany, inflation accelerates over six months compared to 12 months and over three months compared to six months. Only Italy shows headline inflation lower over three months than it is over six months and in the case of Italy inflation is falling at a 1.6% annual rate.

    Core inflation or ex-energy measure are in the table for Germany, Italy, and Spain. Italy and Spain show core inflation decelerated to a sub 2% pace over three months. But in Germany, ex-energy inflation is stubborn at 3.1%, the same as its six-month pace.

  • The S&P composite PMI tracks economic performance across manufacturing and services sectors for a group of 25 countries; it shows mixed performance in December with conditions slightly slowing for just over half of the reporters. However, among the larger economies, conditions are largely improving with the United States improving and with the European Monetary Union improving in December, including the large individual members of the union: Germany, France, Italy, and Spain. Japan also improves month-to-month in December although among large economies the U.K. economy worsens and worsens for the third month in a row. Condions in China also deteriorate.

    The U.S. shows composite conditions improving over 12 months, six months, and three months based on averages, as does Ireland, and Sweden, and Hong Kong. Worsening consistently from 12-months to six-months to three-months is only India. In the case of India, this is a slowing from extremely high readings as the percentile standing for India's composite in December is in its 71.9 percentile tying it for the fourth highest percentile ranking in this sample of countries over the last five years.

    While there was still a great deal of slowing, there wasn't that much contraction going on in this group of countries. Only 6 composite readings are below 50, indicating contractions in December compared to seven in November and October. Over three months averages show only 7 contracting; over six months, eight are contracting; and over 12 months six are contracting. In terms of percentile standings, however, 15 of the 25 reporters in the table show relative standings below their medians over the last five years so relative weakness is the rule although contraction is not.

    The unweighted average for the sample is for a composite PMI reading of 51.8 which shows a bare-bones expansion. The unweighted U.S., U.K., and European Monetary Union average is at 51.8, the G-7 weighted average is at 52.8, while the G-6 average, that excludes the U.S., is at 48.9. The G-7 weighted average has a 52.6 percentile standing over the last five years while the G-6 GDP-weighted average has only a 29.8 percentile outstanding emphasizing the strength that the U.S. economy imparts to any measure of the performance of the most advanced economies.

    Ranked over the last five years, only 10 economies have standings above their medians for this period. The median for the whole sampler is at a 43.9 percentile standing; the average is at a 48.6 percentile standing- there's currently still a great deal of weakness among these countries. The weakest standing in the sample is for France at a 21.1 percentile standing with Singapore's 24.6 percentile standing running a close second, the U.K. ranks third worst at 26.3 percentile, and Ghana's 28.1 percentile standing is in 4th place.

    There's little evidence of trend as the chart above shows. The G-7 reading over 12 months, six months, and three months is locked in a narrow range between 52.2 and 52.6; the G-6 range is lower but also narrow between 49.0 and 49.9. The overall average fluctuates between 51.8 for three months and 52.0 over 12 months. For the most part, we're getting readings that are in the growth category but simply not very impressive and readings that are quite low by the standards set over the last five years which was by itself or relatively listless.

  • The readings improve a bit in December, moving the median to 49.7 from a 3-month average of 49.3. The average of manufacturing among reporting Asian contributors have moved up above 50. The BRIC average remains above 50 but has slipped a bit lower on the month.

    However, overall, the percentage of reporters that improved month-to-month is only 27.8%. Two thirds improve over three months compared to six-months based on comparing the averages; 22% improve over six months compared to 12-month averages. And two-thirds improved over 12 months compared the 12-month average from one year-ago. This is not a strong record of improving trends based on breadth.

    The changes in the medians calculated over 12 months, 6 months and 3 months show that the median readings have been steadily eroding.

    The queue standing places an ordinal ranking on each contributor over data since January 2020. Among the 18 reporters in the table, only five have queue standings above their 50% level (above their respective medians calculated over this period). Four of the countries have standings in the 50-60 percentile range with the highest rankings at a 63.3 percentile standing (Taiwan). China, India, Mexico, and Canada (all either BRIC or U.S. MCA members) are the remaining countries with standings above their historic medians.

    Eight reporters in the table have PMI values in December that are above the values they posted in January 2020. The strongest reading is reported by Russia, at a gain of 2.9 points (really?) with the weakest, a drop of 9.1 points in France. The U.S., the U.K., Germany, and the euro area all have drops over this period of 2.5 points or more. The most developed countries seem to be having the hardest time during this episode.

    PMI standings log a median at 38.3% for reporting countries over the last five years of data. The High-Low percentages find that Mexico, China, and India have standings in the upper 20 percentile of that range (as opposed to their queue percentile) of data. Only the most developed countries and the euro area, Germany, France, the U.S., the U.K., and Brazil have percentile standings below their high-low midpoints (below the 50 mark).

    While the U.S. economy is showing signs of ongoing and even improving growth, the rest of the world is not. Even in the U.S., manufacturing is the laggard sector. The graph shows that since early-2023 there has been little improvement.