Bank of France Business Indicator Rebounds in February

The Bank of France business indicator rose to 107.1 in February from 106.6 in January. The index stands above its 12-month average which is at 104.4 and resides above its long-term average since August 1990 by a considerable amount. The indicator has a percentile standing on that timeline at its 82.6 percentile, a relatively strong standing for this indicator. Compared to just before the COVID emergency struck, the survey indicator is up by 10.4 points indicating a reasonably robust rebound during this two-year period.
Survey standings The components of the survey are a somewhat mixed lot. The strongest parts of the survey are for employment, both employment as expected and the employment change versus last month. Both of those line items have standings in their 90th percentile, in fact, in the upper part of their 90th percentile deciles. These are the indicators that are most responsible for giving the headline such strong standing. Apart from that, the order book standing is also relatively firm, at 89.2 percentile with the standing for foreign orders at 69.9% and for the change in total new orders at 72.8%. All of these indicators are somewhere between firm-to-strong. On the weaker side are inventories that have only 59.1% standing; still above their historic median although inventories are the only variable showing a net lower standing currently than they had in February 2020 before the virus struck. Capacity usage is also weak – indicating that a lot of slack remains in the system.
Trouble in paradise? Somewhat troubling is the response ranking for expected production. Expected production has only a 24.8 percentile standing, and it only increased by 5.6 points compared to February 2020. At a 24.8 percentile standing, expected production is well below its historic median indicating some trouble with the outlook on the part of producers. However, that standing flies in the face of such a strong standing for expected employment. So, there are things in this survey that raise eyebrows and may raise some concerns. However, for the moment, the survey doesn't seem to have any consistencies in it that cause us to think that it is seriously deteriorating.
Month-to-month and recent trends Turning to the month-to-month changes, the output change variable fell to 14.1 in February from 24.6 in January and that's also a decline from its December level. Expected production has been struggling ever since COVID struck.
Overall, there are nine components and the headline. Of the nine components, six weakened in February. Six have weakened on balance over three months and five have weakened over six months.
While output change has a solid historic standing, it has in fact struggled showing declines in four of the last six months and a net decline on balance. Expected production has weakened in February and is weaker on balance over three months but is stronger over six months.
Despite weakening in February, order books show declines in only two of six months and mark solid-to-strong increases over both three-months and six-months. Changes in orders are weaker than the volume of orders on the books as both foreign order and total order changes are weaker in three of the last six months and both series are weaker on balance over three months and six months on balance.
The change in finished inventories logs a negative value in February, but it improves from November. The series chronically logs negative values. Its current reading is a touch better than its 12-month average and above its historic median. Capacity use has weakened in four of the last six months and is lower on balance over three months and six months.
Both employment gauges weakened in February from their January level. Both have very strong high 90th percentile standings. The change in employment month-to-month was positive for four months in a row before declining in February. However, expected employment is lower in two of the last three months.
Outlook and risks On balance, the French survey looks sturdy enough. As often is the case with these surveys, the jobs components stay the strongest the longest. But there is some encroaching weakness for output and more outright weakness for expected production. There is still some lingering risk of an unknown dimension for COVID to return. Related to that, there are global supply chain problems. But the new risk is the War in Ukraine. Inflation is high and stubborn in Europe and higher and more stubborn in the U.S. The war is feeding inflation by pumping up oil and commodity prices. Central banks have work to do and yet the solidity of the economy is not assured and central banks for the most part have not even ‘begun to fight.’ What will happen when they do?

Robert Brusca
AuthorMore in Author Profile »Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media. Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.