Haver Analytics
Haver Analytics
Global| Sep 06 2022

Composite PMIs Weaken in August

20220906A2.jpg

Among the 25 entries in the table for composite PMI values in August, only 6 show month-to-month increases in August. Those showing improvement are Italy, Sweden, India, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Egypt. Three of them are countries in the Middle East, India was another, Sweden, a northern European economy, and Italy, a Mediterranean European Monetary Union member, was the final member of this group. There's nothing special that stitches them together apart from the three Middle Eastern countries that are geographically concentrated and that benefit from the ongoing high oil prices in the world economy.

In July only seven countries had improved month-to-month and in June on the eight countries had improved month-to-month; for the most part these were different groups of countries although Russia improved in July and June, Saudi Arabia improved in August and June, Ghana improved in July and June, Egypt improved in August and July, all of the rest of the cases were isolated.

Similarly, over three months only nine countries have improved compared to six-months; none of them were among the group of the largest economies in the table. Over six months nine countries improved compared to 12-months and year-over-year 11 countries improved compared to the 12-month period earlier; that count still falling short of representing half of the group.

The percentile standings show that a large proportion of the August values still reside in the upper portion of the full range of values these countries have had in their PMI composites from January 2018 to date. However, if we look at the queue percentile standings that place the August value in a particular spot in its historic queue based upon the number of observations above and below it, rather than based upon the maximum and minimum values in the range, we get a very different result. That result reveals the month's readings to be quite a bit weaker than range standings suggest. Fully 16 of the 25 values in the table reside below their historic medians which means on a queue percentile basis they have rankings below their 50th percentile. Most of them, in fact, are far below their 50th percentile indicating extremely weak standings. Nine of the 25 members have percentile standings in the lower one-fifth up their historic queue of data. That means that they have been stronger than their August values 80% of the time or more. Only two countries have percentile standings in the top 10% of their queues: those are India and Saudi Arabia.

The composite – service sector plus manufacturing sector- PMI paints a picture of the global economy that is weakening and paints a picture of a global economy that is already weak. At the bottom of the table, average and median data for benchmark countries and aggregates provide more perspective. The unweighted average for the U.S., the U.K., the European Monetary Union, and Japan has a PMI value of 48.2 in August and 49.8 in July; both indicate that those countries on an unweighted average basis are showing contracting economies based on the averaged composite PMIs.

These are composite PMIs not just the manufacturing sector; they include the broad services sector and therefore they're broad gauge of these economies. PMI data can differ from ordinary economic data which I referred to as accounting data since GDP and traditional statistics tend to count the data rather than to deal with the sorts of breath statistics that PMI data are based on. However, the two data presentations do tend to give us many of the same signals and the PMI data based on breath are well known to be sensitive to changes in economic conditions; they can serve the role of a canary and a coal mine to warn us when something is starting to go wrong.

The unweighted average for the U.S., U.K., EMU and Japan readings progressed from 53.4 over 12 months to 52.6 over six months to 50.2 over three months that's a clear weakening. For the Bric excluding Russia, the pattern is different: 52.3 for the 12-month average, slipping to 52.2 for the six-month average, but then rising to 54.7 over three months. The average for the full 25-member group slips to 53.0 over six months from 53.6 over 12 months and again to 52.3 over three months. The median for the full set of countries also shows slippage from 53.8 over 12 months to 53.0 over six months and to 51.8 over three months. Both the median and the average measures for the full data set show slippage.

However, when it comes to contraction, August shows only 10 of 25 jurisdictions below 50 compared to 7 in July and 4 in June. Over three months only six averages show below 50 values compared to five over six months and 5 over 12 months. This is a starkly different comparison from slowing. Statistics on slowing show 19 jurisdictions slowing in August compared to 17 in July and 17 slowing in June compared to May. Over three months 16 jurisdictions slow compared to six-months, and in six-months 16 slow compared to their 12-month values. Over 12-months, however, only three jurisdictions slow compared to 12-months earlier. Slowing is extremely widespread; but contraction is still not very widespread, occurring in its most frequent month of August in only 10 of 25 of these reporting jurisdictions – still that's 40%.

220906table.png

The message from this measure is quite clear: there is slowing, there is weakness, there are number of countries that are showing contraction. Meanwhile, central banks are raising interest rates and Russia has just shut off the pipeline providing the most important source of gas to Europe. That is something that is going to further exacerbate weakening economic conditions in Europe and that will create a terrible dilemma for the ECB since this will clearly weaken the economy; however, inflation is still too high in Europe.

The ECB on the horns of a dilemma The ECB finds itself in an impossible position. With the pipeline shut off, any view that there might have been a very large rate increase on this table for this week's meeting should certainly be revised. The ECB may still go ahead with an ordinary 50 basis point hike, but even that is going to feel uncomfortable in an environment where gas supplies are being cut off and where the outlook for economic growth is going to diminish further.

Meanwhile, the U.S. reported out on Friday a strong job report that nonetheless showed some weakening and train with a rising unemployment rate and still strong wage gains Wages and jobs appear to be still growing rapidly at a time that inflation remains over the top. The Fed has its own dilemmas, but nothing like the dilemma faced by the ECB. The U.K. has a new Prime Minister who faces very difficult set of challenges there. There's a lot of shifting going on in this global economy on the policy front through economic mechanisms and geopolitical mechanisms. It's still a very difficult time for policymakers. Fans of Star Trek may see the ECB as if embedded in a real life ‘Kobayashi Maru' test, a situation in which there is no way out. It clearly is in the most difficult position of all central banks.

  • Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media.   Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.

    More in Author Profile »

More Economy in Brief