EMU GDP Remain Slowed to a Crawl After Revision

There will be no hearts and flowers for GDP growth in the European Monetary Union on Valentine's Day. However, the revisions to GDP have kept the growth rate from turning negative in the fourth quarter (Q/Q measure). The third quarter negative number for Q/Q growth gave rise to concerns that the revision to GDP could take forth quarter growth into negative territory and that would trigger the analysis that the economy had dipped into recession.

Really?

‘Technical’ recession? Ha! You may read articles saying that the economy has avoided ‘technical’ recession. However, I don't know about you, but since very early elementary school I haven't thought of 1 + 1 equaling 2 being ‘technical’ for quite a while. The notion that two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth are recession is anything but a technical definition of anything. Instead, that is a ‘rule of thumb’ definition of recession. And a rule of thumb is anything but technical, it is ‘one-off,’ ‘on the fly,’ a ‘quick study.’

The notion of two consecutive quarters as a recession I believe has been popularized because it can take the official agencies that designate periods as recessions quite a while to make the call that the economy is in recession. And the notion that two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth mark a recession is something that's simple and can be known immediately.

On the other hand, taking a rule of thumb like this as something that is literally true obviously has shortcomings. There are also good reasons not to have a knee-jerk fast declaration of recession. European Monetary Union GDP fell by 0.5% at an annual rate in the third quarter of 2023; it's now risen by 0.2% at an annual rate in the fourth quarter. Had it been three tenths of a percentage point weaker (at an annual rate in the fourth quarter) would it really have made that much difference to anything?

I don't think so.

One bullet dodged The U.S. has already, in the post COVID period logged two consecutive quarters of negative GDP growth without having anyone (except a few with a political axe to grind) seriously suggesting that the U.S. economy was in recession during those two quarters. The declines in GDP for the U.S. were modest and at the same time job growth was enormous during those quarters.

What recessions are Recessions are special periods; and, while the extreme economic weakness in the U.S. economy during COVID was barely three months long, that period has been designated a recession. It should not be a poster child for recession dating. The point is that the COVID period was very unusual. The decline in GDP was extremely severe, and it was broad across the economy. However, the period was also extremely short. When recession daters look at recessionary candidate periods, they're looking to find economic activity that has been (1) severely impacted, (2) that has affected the economy broadly, and (3) that has lasted for a sufficiently long period of time to disrupt the economy and earn the designation as a recession. This is why it generally takes recession-dating experts some time before they pull the trigger on calling a period a recession or not. The COVID period is a notable example of a period that was very short and did not fulfill the length criterion but had impacted the breadth and the depth criteria so deeply that it was construed as a recession anyway. The main reason for this is probably the severe increase in the unemployment rate that occurred even though that unemployment rate during recovery came down quite rapidly.

The trappings of recession In Europe, we see none of the trappings of recession. The sense already is that inflation has flared and is starting to come down. We are not left with the opinion that the central bank is going to have to keep pounding interest rates higher until the economy is pulverized. Unemployment rates throughout the European Union remain extremely low and among the the lowest as a group that the Monetary Union has had since it was formed. But there are still a lot of economic risks and things that could go wrong. But the economy simply does not exhibit a lot of the characteristics we would need to see to support the call of recession. Financial distress is mostly absent.

Soft growth and political pressure However, the European economy is in a definite soft spot, a flat spot, and it's underperforming. The proximity of the European Monetary Union to the war in Ukraine is one of the main reasons. And now with more conflict in the Middle East with the Suez channel shuttered, there is another blow that the European economy will have to deal with. Europe, like the U.S., is beginning to creak under the burden of supporting the war in Ukraine. And there has been political backlash from this support in the U.S. in the form of concerns about all the spending that helps people on foreign shores. While in the European Monetary Union, the most immediate recent impact has been on farmers who are concerned about cheap Ukrainian grains in the EMU and the removal of gasoline subsidies to the farm sector that is already under pressure.

Growth data have some positives The table shows both quarter-to-quarter data for the most recent three quarters and year-over-year data for the previous four-quarters. Year-over-year data show only one country’s growth rate observation in Q4 is decelerating compared to the year-over-year growth rate in the third quarter. GDP on a year-over-year basis is not broadly decelerating in the European Monetary Union or across most of its early reporting members- the Netherlands is the lone exception. This is a far more important observation than the fact that 0.2% is a positive number and it's not -0.1%. Similarly, quarter-to-quarter growth shows broader increases in Q2 compared to Q1 and broadly increases in Q4 compared to Q3, while the third quarter shows widespread growth decelerations that appear now be a one-quarter phenomenon- peak weakness was Q3.

The U.S. as bellwether If the U.S. is an indication, the global economy is beginning to pick up. Global PMI data already are showing indications that the service sectors have stopped slowing and the manufacturing sectors - on whatever metrics they have been reporting - are not getting weaker.

Summing up Looking at the data in the table, the U.S. is presented as a counterpoint to the European members. The European Monetary Union data are further segregated into the top four-economies versus the rest of the Monetary Union. The U.S. has been performing much better than Monetary Union members (both groups) since at least the second quarter of 2023. If the U.S. is going to be a bellwether for the change in growth in this business cycle, the next turn on the cycle is up, not down. For central banks having made a lot of progress on inflation, this is good news. However, the fly-in-the-ointment is this: while inflation is lower than it was, it's still above target in most inflation-targeting countries/regions. Economies are going to begin to accelerate again before inflation is tamed and brought down into the target area. This means there may be a second round of inflation fighting that's needed and that could jeopardize ongoing growth. For now, recession has been dodged, but maybe not later…No one wants to talk about that. And, in the U.S., it's being ignored because monetary policy is being made in an election year. A strategy to back off rate hikes or to begin rate cuts with inflation not clearly in target at a time the economy is more clearly accelerating has become and will continue to be a hot potato in the U.S. and an extremely hot potato for the Fed to juggle. Europe will not be immune to the collateral damage that will spread through markets if the Fed engages premature rate cuts.