Flash PMIs Mostly Firm or Flatten at Weak Levels
Technically the flash PMI readings are slightly stronger month-to-month in more places than they are weaker in November. But the improvements are small. Of the eighteen readings in the table, only six are weaker month-to-month in November, compared to nine of eighteen weakening in October and eleven of eighteen weakening in September.
Sequentially weak: The sequential readings weakened in seventeen of eighteen readings over three months, in fourteen of eighteen over six months and in fourteen of eighteen over 12 months.
Some monthly resilience: While monthly data are showing a bit of resilience in November, the sense of rebound is small and the trend weakness is impressively negative. The 3-month change column is relevant here because the sequential data are calculated on averages and only on hard data, not on flash values. So, the 3-month change column in the table is the 3-month change in monthly flash values. On that basis, seven of eighteen observations are weaker over three months - fewer than half of them. Weakness on that basis is across all sectors in France and in Japan. The EMU exhibits net sector weakness in the service sector over three months. The U.K. and Germany show some sizeable improvement over three months on this net basis while the U.S. shows moderate improvements across sectors over three months.
Weakness is the bottom line: The bottom line for these members, however, is still much more that conditions are weak. Ranked on Data since January 2019, the average composite rank of the six jurisdictions in the table is 24.9%. The average manufacturing sector rank is 12.6%. The average service sector rank is 31.1%. Of course, all these pooled observations are below the 50th percentile, leaving them well below historic median values.
Sector standings: Among individual country sector rankings only the service sector in Japan has an above 50-percentile standing, at its 61st percentile – no sector in any other country in the table comes close to that. And every sector in every reporter shows a reading lower than its January 2020 level before Covid struck, marking the last four years as having made no net progress in the wake of Covid.
Evaluating the Covid/post-Covid period: However, evaluating the individual country and sector results, over the past nearly five years, sectors have been above their January 2020 levels only about 48% of the time. The composite indexes were above their January 2020 levels just about half the time. However, the service sector was above its January 2020 level about 53% of the time while manufacturing was above its January 2020 level only about 40% of the time.
Manufacturing coming under less stress? Manufacturing clearly continues to be hard hit. While manufacturing has improved on the month in the EMU, Germany and the U.K., it has an average PMI ranking only in its 12th percentile. Over 3 months the manufacturing PMI has advanced the strongest- by 4.1 points- in the U.K., by 3.2 points in German, by 0.1 point in the EMU, and by 1.5 diffusion points in the U.S. Manufacturing is weaker over three months by 3.9 points in France and weaker by 1.5 points in Japan. There is a hint of improvement in manufacturing globally, but not much more than a hint.
Robert Brusca
AuthorMore in Author Profile »Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media. Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.