Slight Improvement in November Breadth for Global MFG PMIs
The S&P manufacturing PMI indexes improved in November as slightly more countries saw increases than saw deterioration. However, the median gauge slipped slightly on a month-to-month basis. Rather than thinking of the report as being better or worse month-to-month, it seems more productive to recognize how stable the readings have been over the past year, at least in PMI terms. The median readings for 12-month, six-month, and three-month averages across countries/regions are in a range of 48.6 to 48.7 – quite tight. The period-to-period changes are quite small except that the 12-month average compared to 12-months ago shows substantial slippage of 3.4 diffusion points. But since that slippage, the readings have been quite consistent.
The queue or rank percentile standings have a median at the 24th percentile; however, if we choose to place the monthly observations in a range of high to low, the median is at the 58.4 percentile. I prefer the queue percentile standings, because they include all the observations while the percent-of-range calculations only involve the very highest, the very lowest, and the current observations. The queue percentile standings reveal a few extremely strong readings. Mexico has a 96.2 percentile standing and that is matched by Russia - if you believe that response. India has a 65.4 percentile standing. Indonesia sports a 57.7 percentile standing. South Korea logs a 55.8 percentile standing. All the rest of the standings are below the 50th percentile which places them below their historic medians. The most industrialized and developed countries are giving us the worst readings in November.
Diffusion measures the percentage of countries where there is improvement; that reading goes to a 61-percent diffusion reading for 12-months compared to 12-months ago. There is also a 61-percent diffusion reading for six-months compared to 12-months and a 50-percent reading for three-months compared to six-months. In the current month the diffusion reading has a 66.7 percent breadth reading implying an improvement in about two-thirds of the observations compared to one-month ago. Breadth is generally improving slowly. The grey highlights in the table flag those observations with diffusion readings above 50. There you can see that readings above 50 have not been sporadic but have been consistent with Mexico, Russia, India, and Indonesia showing readings above 50 on a consistent basis; South Korea shows a reading above 50 in November alone.
The percentile standings for groups at the bottom of the table reveal that the queue percentile standing for the U.S., the U.K., European Monetary Union, Canada, and Japan is at the 16.9 percentile. BRIC countries are at their 53.8 percentile, while the average for Asia is at its 34.6 percentile. The BRIC readings are considerably influenced by Russia where the economy is believed to be performing poorly although Russia continues to report extremely strong readings. India tends to report PMI values above 50, while China and Brazil tend to report PMI values below 50.
Summing up The message from the manufacturing PMIs broadly is that in November, very little has changed and that conditions in manufacturing remain weak. The good news is that conditions don't seem to be deteriorating and the bad news is that conditions don't seem to be improving. However, there is other evidence of change. Inflation in the EMU is falling rather sharply. U.S. inflation is falling more rapidly than expected, and steadily. Meanwhile, the Baltic dry goods index has made a strong move to its highest level since early 2022 – a level that it reached and held only briefly. The notion of global trade revival has not yet hit the manufacturing PMIs. And while there is broad global focus on the unexpected withering of inflation, this is being treated as a likely opportunity for central banks to cut rates sooner rather than later. However, inflation is only weakening and not back to target. If growth is already picking up, how will stronger growth and dropping inflation interreact and how will monetary policy respond? Markets seem to have some ‘cook-book’ pricing built-in, but I’m not sure it is a comprehensive recipe.
Robert Brusca
AuthorMore in Author Profile »Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media. Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.