Haver Analytics
Haver Analytics

Introducing

Robert Brusca

Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media.   Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.

Publications by Robert Brusca

  • United Kingdom
    | May 21 2025

    UK Inflation Rises

    UK inflation is rising. Whereas weakening oil prices seem to be containing inflation everywhere else, particularly in the European Monetary Union, but also to some extent in the United States, we see in the United Kingdom that headline inflation is on an uptrend, core inflation is on an uptrend, too, not quite as discernible as this, but it's nonetheless on its own uptrend.

    Headline inflation for the UK CPI-H measure rose by 0.6% in April after 0.2% in March and in February. The CPI-H version of core excluding food, energy, alcohol, and tobacco rose by 0.4% in April after rising 0.3% in March and 0.2% in February.

    Sequential inflation rates show the CPI-H up 4% over 12 months, up at 4.7% pace over 6-months and up 3.9% at an annual rate over 3-months. All of these rates are excessive compared to the Bank of England's 2% target. A year ago, the headline was running at 3.1% year-over-year; conditions have worsened since then even in the face of what have been lower and falling global energy prices.

    The sequential trend for the CPI-H core measure shows a gain of 4.3% over 12-months, a 4.6% annual rate rise over 6-months and a 4% annual rate gain over 3-months. The only clear pattern we have from these various periods is that in all of them the inflation rate is excessive; and one year-ago the core year-over-year pace was 4.4%. So, conditions appear as though they may have improved marginally since then, but again I would emphasize that I'm only saying that it appears so, and that the improvement is marginal.

    Diffusion calculations show the breadth of acceleration period to period and demonstrate that inflation acceleration has become less common than it was a year ago when headline inflation was up 3.1%. The diffusion of inflation was only 9.1% then, that tells us that the overall inflation rate was 3.1% and that prices were not generally accelerating across most categories only in 9% of them. However, this year the diffusion gauge for the headline that has inflation up to 4% is at 54.5% and then the gauge over 6-months with the inflation rate is 4.7% has diffusion also at 54.5%. And both of those horizons’ inflation is accelerating slightly more than it's decelerating since the diffusion measures are above the neutral value of 50. However, over 3-months when the inflation rate settles down a bit to 3.9% the diffusion measure is only 36.4%, indicating that the breadth of inflation has narrowed and that there is now more deflation than there is inflation over 3-months. That comes from comparing the inflation rates when 3-month inflation was 3.9% to 6-months when it was 4.7%. The slightly improved diffusion gauge is therefore not surprising; however, it's also encouraging that it suggests that the slower inflation rate has more breadth to it and isn't just the result of one or two rogue categories that may have tipped the balance.

    At the bottom of the table as a reference we have the unemployment rate as well as the UK claimant rate of unemployment and on these measures we you can see that the economy has been weakening slightly The year ago unemployment rate was 4%, the claimant rate was 4.1% over the last 12-months it moved up to 4.3% with the claimant rate still at 4.1% over 3-months. The unemployment rate is up to 4.4% compared to 4.5%; the claimant rate shows the unemployment rate has been creeping up although there's nothing draconian in train. This is not a happy report for the Bank of England. Inflation is still not under control and while the breadth of inflation may have been cut over three months all of the inflation data suggest that inflation is stubborn and that it has been stubborn and that there's a slightly accelerating trend that is still underway. This is an unfriendly report.

  • Headline German inflation has logged another stellar number showing prices down 0.7% in April after falling 0.7% in March and dropping by 0.2% in February. German inflation over three-months is falling at a 6.4% annual rate, over six-months it is falling at a 2.6% annual rate, and year-over-year it is falling by 0.9%. That progression shows clear discipline for German headline inflation and, in fact, raises the specter that inflation might be too weak with year-over-year inflation falling -1% at an annual rate, however, that's only part of the story

    Polar opposite trends for the headline vs ex-energy In April the PPI excluding energy rose by 0.3%, it rose by 0.2% in March, and by 0.2% in February. The same progression for the PPI X-energy shows inflation running at 2.7% annual rate over three-months at a 1.9% annual rate over six-months now to a 1.7% annual rate year-over-year. This means, of course, instead of decelerating with prices receding, inflation is accelerating and rising. These are not just slightly different takes on inflation, these are polar opposite events, calling for polar opposite concerns, and polar opposite policies.

    The role of oil When we wrote about CPI results earlier, we pointed out the same phenomenon was in place with headline CPI inflation very well behaved and core inflation not doing quite as well (see the CPI data in the table above). However, with the PPI this dichotomy is even clearer and it comes with the same source of divergence, the fact that Brent oil prices have been falling sharply the table shows Brent oil prices (adjusted into Euro terms) falling in April and March and in February and further shows the euro cost of Brent oil prices prices falling at a 60% annual rate over three months, following the 25% annualized drop over six-months, and the the 28% annual rate over 12-months. Oil prices are the engine that is making the inflation performance look good. However, beyond energy, the forces of inflation are still firm, still percolating, and in PPI terms, while they are at an acceptable year-over-year pace, they are beginning to accelerate as the three-month pace for inflation at 2.7% is too high.

    Inflation by sector Inflation statistics by category shows consumer goods (NSA) inflation at 3% over 12 months, 4.5% over 6-months and at a 4.8% annual rate over three-months - excessive and accelerating. For investment goods inflation runs at 2% year-over-year up at a 2.8% pace over 6-months and then at a 2.4% pace over 3-months not exactly accelerating but both three- and six-month inflation rates rise above the preferred 2% year-over-year pace. Intermediate goods show inflation at 0.3% over 12-months, rising to 1% at an annual rate over 6-months and at a 3.5% annual rate over three-months.

    The table includes the CPI as a reference point and there we see that the CPI sequentially is running at a fairly steady 2.1% to 2.3% annual rate. The ex-energy inflation rate is higher although still relatively flat in the 2.6 to 2.8% range- roughly one-half of one percentage point hotter than the headline.

    Q2 Inflation Starts the quarter mixed Inflation in the second quarter, a quarter that data-wise is just beginning, shows the headline PPI falling 6.1% at an annual rate with the PPI ex-energy rising 3.1% at an annual rate sector readings show consumer goods, investment goods, and intermediate goods inflation runs between slightly- to substantially-excessive early in the second quarter. The German CPI and CPI ex-energy readings are running slightly hot even though on this time horizon Brent-euro-based oil prices are falling at nearly 50% annual rate.

    Wrap on inflation: a dichotomy, but not a real problem A German PPI is not disturbingly strong but once again it's slightly strong and only the headline is really behaving and that's under the influence of some extraordinarily supportive news from oil prices. The headline, in fact, looks worrisome in the other direction because of the ongoing oil price collapse. On balance inflation in Germany appears to be still somewhat stubborn. Germany continues to be buffeted by the forces of war and the uncertainty over US tariff policy as well as the prospect of its own recently inherited burden to take care of its own defense expenditures, something that is likely to underpin growth in Germany and possibly to stoke more inflation pressures. These factors continue to be the main forces to keep an eye on in Germany. For its part, the ECB has warned that the future may be shaping up with different risks.

  • European Monetary Union inflation rose by 0.1% in April but the core is rising by 0.3%. The headline rate rose by 0.2% in February and was flat in March; the core has slightly accelerated in April from its 0.1% gain in February and its 0.2% rise in March.

    The progressive headline inflation sequence shows inflation stable to accelerating with a 2.2% annual rate over 12-months, a slight uptick to 2.3% annual rate over 6-months and then down to a pace of 1.4% over 3-months. The EMU core shows a steadier deceleration with a 2.7% rise over 12-months, a 2.5% annual rate gain over six-months, and a 2.3% annual rate gain over three-months.

    In April the largest monetary union economies show that monthly inflation has been well-behaved with no change in Germany, a 0.1% increase in Spain, and a 0.1% decline in Italy; all of that is juxtaposed against the 0.4% rise in France but France's increase comes after several months of the headline inflation declining. France is not really an outlier in this process.

    Looking at sequential inflation rates across the largest monetary union economies, Germany shows inflation decelerating with the 1.9% annual rate over 12-months and six-months then showing prices declining 0.6% at an annual rate over three-months. France shows inflation at 0.9% over 12-months down to a 0.5% at an annual rate rise over six-months and with prices falling at a 1.4% annual rate over three-months. Italian inflation, contrarily, is accelerating from 2% over 12-months to 3% over six-months to an annual rate of 3.3% over three-months. Italian inflation expands 2.1% over 12-months, rising to a 3% pace over six-months, then with shows prices falling at a 0.8% annual rate over three-months. These are unclear trends, however, for three of the four largest economies, prices are falling over three-months on balance. However, that kind of optimism doesn't carry through to core inflation. Clearly, the driving good-inflation news is falling Brent oil prices. Brent prices, expressed in euros, fell 10.7% in April after falling 7% in March and falling 4.3% in February. Over the sequential periods we have Brent oil prices down 27.7% over 12-months falling at a 25% annual rate over six-months and falling at a 60% annual rate over three-months. It's no surprise whatsoever that headline inflation in the monetary union is behaving in the face of such oil price weakness.

    Core inflation in the monetary union tells a very different story. For Germany we have inflation excluding energy prices; on that basis data show some deceleration but from 2.8% over 12-months to 2.6% over 6-months and then a slight back up to 2.7% at an annual rate over three-months. French core inflation is stuck but it appears to be stuck below the 2% mark with a 1.5% gain over 12-months, a gain of 1.8% at an annual rate over six-months and a gain at 1.6% get an annual rate over three-months. In Italy inflation is up 2.1% over 12-months, up at a 2.2% annual rate over six-months and up at a 2.7% annual rate over three-months. Core Spanish inflation is cruising just above the ECB's desired mark at a 2.3% annual rate over 12-months, at 2.1% annual rate gain over six-months and a 2.3% annual rate gain over three-months.

    More Progress to come! The inflation news for the monetary union is not particularly bad, it just simply hasn't conformed to its target yet. A year ago, year-over-year inflation was 2.2%. That's the same as year-over-year inflation now, in April of 2025. A year-ago core inflation for the monetary union was up at a 2.7% annual rate over 12-months, and now, in April, it's rising at the same 2.7% annual rate. Still, for all of 2025 inflation is expected to be only slightly above the 2% mark, reaching its target pace by mid-year. Annual 2.1% inflation is expected for all of 2025; it then is predicted to dip below 2% in the next two years. Clearly what happens with the United States tariff negotiations will have a big impact on these estimates.

  • Strong gains in IP - Industrial production in the European Monetary Union rose by 2.6% in March with manufacturing output up by 2.5% I'll put a manufacturing rose across all of the main manufacturing sectors led by a 3.2% month to month gain in capital goods output with intermediate goods output at 0.6%, the weakest sector increase.

    **Accelerating trends **- Output on the monetary union is also accelerating but the headline series up at a 20% annual rate over three months stepped up from a 9.6% annual rate increase over six months and from a 3.9% increase over 12 months the acceleration and manufacturing it's quite similar to the crowd profile on the headline series capital goods output accelerates from 12 months to six months to three months as doesn't media code output consumer goods output rises by 13.5% / 12 months still matches the double digit gain over six months at 11.1% but then also grows in only 8.2% in an annual rate over three months we'll lose our strong and solid growth rates they reflect a deceleration

    Survey vs accounting data - very different stories: There's another interesting nugget in this report… I summarize, using text descriptions, the behavior of the PMI gauges for EMU. Comparing the recent three-months of data as well as readings over the three sequential periods, what we see is that, while output in the monetary union is rising and rising strongly and accelerating over this time profile in IP data, the S&P PMIs for manufacturing in the monetary union are below 50 in each of the sequential time periods as well as each of the recent months – that is quite a disconnect. We look at these PMI gauges largely because they are the earliest data that we have on economic statistics. But here we have an example of how the accounting data that reflect output numbers that are counted up by national statistics bureaus compare to privately generated survey data that are inferential. We find that the two series give us very different results. The PMI data are useful and can often be early warning signs of things changing direction, however, for the Euro-Area it's clear that the PMI data have been unduly pessimistic over the last year. Meanwhile, in the US, the point is being made that the survey style data < sometimes called ‘soft data’> have been much weaker. Perhaps this is a warning that you should be aware you're placing too much emphasis on those data.

    Quarter-to-Date: Output to date in the current quarter is also strong but the headline series is up at a 9% annual rate. Manufacturing is up at an 8.3% annual rate and the only consumer durable goods are showing a decline in output in the quarter. Rankings of year-over-year growth rates on data back to mid-2007 show the current year-over-year growth rate rankings above their respective 50th percentiles, which means they're above their historic medians for this period. This is true for all the EMU-wide characteristics except capital goods.

    Some output declines linger, but they do not dominate - Country level data for 13 monetary union members focus on the manufacturing sectors and show 5 manufacturing sectors with output declining in March, in February, and in January, out of 13 reporting countries that is not extreme but is significant. Looking at the 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month periods, output contracts on those horizons and only for three to four of the reporting countries. Among the four largest monetary union members only Italy shows output declines sequentially and those declines are for 12-months and 6-months as Italy posts a strong, 7.2% annual rate increase, over 3-months.

    Only three monetary union countries show quarter-to-date declines; these data are now complete data for the quarter. Countries with declining output QTD are Spain, Malta, and Greece.

    However, all is not completely well in the monetary union… when we rank IP growth rates on data back to June 2007, the three largest monetary union economies show growth rates that rank below their historic medians. Only Spain, among the largest economies, has a growth rate that ranks above its historic median and that's by a narrow margin with a ranking of 51.4%.

    On balance it's a good manufacturing report for Europe in March. This report shows manufacturing sector to be in solid shape despite all of the concerns and drum beat of weak readings form the PMIs. These data, of course, draw from the period before tariffs were mooted, implemented, and then reduced, so there still may be a bumpy road ahead for industrial output. But we can see that, as of March, conditions are fairly strong for output in Europe, which will continue to be underpinned by the fact that Europe will be spending more to provide for its own defenses from here on out. The tariff impact, whatever it is or isn’t, lies ahead.

  • Measured on the HICP headline scale, German inflation has reached the promised land. Sequentially Germany’s HICP measure is up 1.9% over 12-months up at a 1.9% annual rate over six-months and much weaker at a -0.6% annual rate over three-months. A year ago, the pace of the HICP was 2.6% so this slide of German inflation into its overall target zone for European Monetary Union-wide inflation rate has been slow and relatively consistent.

    The German domestic inflation measure isn't quite as well behaved and shows more signs of simply being stable skimming just above that hallowed 2% mark. A year ago, German domestic inflation ran at a 2.2% annual rate, currently, year-over-year it's at 2.1%, the six-month pace is at 2.3%, the same as the three-month pace, which is 2.3%. None of these are deal-breakers for monetary policy since German inflation has been within a couple of ticks of the desired path even on this domestic scale now for over a year, tracking the target that the ECB seeks for the monetary union as a whole.

    However, a good deal of inflation progress continues to reside in the behavior of oil prices Brent oil prices are down for three-months in a row and they've certainly helped to contribute to good performance on the overall and domestic inflation measures. Germany's domestic CPI excluding energy was up 2.6% a year ago, currently it's up by 2.8% over 12-months it's up at a 2.6% annual rate over six-months, and at a 2.7% annual rate over three-months. Once energy is excluded, Germany's domestic inflation measure is steady, much like its headline measure, however it's skimming somewhere between half a percent and eight-tenths of a percentage point above the 2% target that the ECB sets for the European Monetary Union as a whole.

    The point of saying it that way, talking about German inflation compared to the target for the monetary union as a whole, is to remind everyone that there is no target for inflation in Germany there's only a target for the monetary union as a complete entity. But Germany is the largest economy in the monetary union; what Germany does goes a long way toward putting the overall European measure in its proper place. Currently Brent inflation is down 27.7% over 12 months, it's falling at a 25.4% annual rate over six-months, and dropping at a 60.3% annual rate over three-months. These sharp declines in energy prices certainly go a long way toward making the headline inflation pace for Germany as well as for EMU behave.

    The HICP measure doesn't give us up-to-date energy readings yet so we cannot calculate comparable statistics for the monetary union as a whole. However, the German data are quite suggestive that if we were to do that, we would find a similar outcome, that the HICP headline appears to be well behaved but that the core would probably appear to be a little more stubborn. Regardless of that fact, the question is where the ECB would come down with its discretion. And recently central banks have been quite tolerant about inflation-overshooting. However, that worm may have turned.

    A new future…unfolds or unravels Economies now face different challenges. Europe is going to be in charge of more of its own military defense and that's going to require more spending; that will create more stimulus and possibly generate more inflation pressures. In addition, there is this tariff imbroglio that could resolve either with a closer-to-free-trade result with tariffs being reduced, or a worse-result with more tariffs being imposed. A world with more tariffs or higher tariffs would be a world that was likely to be flirting with inflation a little bit more, at least over the next year or so. The ECB might still continue to be tolerant of that. However, a lot about these economic circumstances remains unknown. There's a lot of uncertainty about the performance of the US economy that can help to set the stage for how the global economy is going to perform. So, the future still offers the potential for more economic drag from a high tariff world or lower inflation performance from a lower tariff world and it's still hard to judge which of these worlds we're going to be in over the next 12- to 24-months. And now, German headline inflation is behaving quite well although the core reminds us that Germany may be farther away from its goal than the headline makes it appear, like that famous rearview mirror image in the movie Jurassic Park. Looking at things through mirrors can distort them. And at this point I don't think policymakers know exactly how to look at the future whether they know the rearview mirror from the windshield or the future from the present. There's a great deal of uncertainty, a great deal of disagreement and very little trust. Stirred together, it's not a good combination for policymakers. Double, double toil and...trouble? We shall see.

  • Forecasting is an ordinary part of economic analysis. And to a large extent, it gets taken for granted as we realize different people are making different forecasts and that there always are differences. We come to accept that, and we realize that there may be some economists who are more optimistic and some who are more pessimistic, some who favor growth more, some who fear inflation more. There are almost always some sorts of biases involved when people make forecasts simply because it's very hard to eliminate bias completely no matter how hard an economist tries to be objective. At the very least, economists usually feel somewhat bound by the previous forecast that they made in order to provide some stability in the guidance that they present.

    The ZEW Forecasts In this month’s ZEW survey, there is an example of this with what I consider to be somewhat quizzical forecasts being offered by the ZEW financial experts, who are largely European experts, at a time that the United States is threatening tariffs. Now this, of course, makes the U.S. the aggressor in this campaign and according to the ZEW experts the U.S. is going to suffer from this more than European economies. However, the U.S. is much less trade-dependent than Europe and certainly far less dependent than Germany which is one of the most trade-dependent large, advanced economies in the world. We measure trade dependency by looking at exports plus imports as a percentage of GDP. By this measure, trade-dependency is around 90% to 95% of for Germany; U.S. dependency is around 30% to 35%. The ZEW experts see the tariff situation making the U.S. economy much worse off than the European or the German economy- why?

    Tariff impact To put this in perspective, in the U.S., high tariffs, if they are binding, will cause imported goods to be more expensive. U.S. firms and consumers will have the choice of deciding whether they want to pay the higher costs to consume those items or to replace them in consumption or their production process. In the case of consumers, it's probably easier because a consumer can switch from an expensive French champagne to a less expensive but still quite good California sparkling wine or Chardonnay- or pay the higher price and enjoy French champaign! However, if U.S. consumers shift, that is going to leave France with a lot of unsold champagne and they need to sell it someplace else and that's a problem since the U.S. is a huge high-income market; that’s the reason that it's sought after by so many countries who export to the United States. U.S. consumers may choose to be satisfied with a different product. In this example the French, or it could be the Germans, or anyone whose exports are distained because of higher prices, might find that they have goods piling up in the shelves that they are not selling. This could cause an unemployment problem that could really snowball- a more severe problem than drinking Chardonnay instead of French champaign!

    The U.S. side On the U.S. side, if people continue to buy these goods, the U.S. will have more inflation that may cause the Fed to stop cutting rates. The Fed might even raise rates, and this could slow the economy down. However, as we know, tariffs are one-time increase in the price level and it's only if the Fed runs ‘bad monetary policy’ that the price bump caused by the tariffs would become inflation… inflation is a persisting increase in prices.

    The new ZEW in May In this new survey, we see the economic situation in May improving relatively substantially in the euro area, as well as worsening slightly in the U.S. and in Germany. We see macroeconomic expectations sharply higher in Germany in May and while they also improve substantially in the U.S., the U.S. is left with economic expectations that are weaker less than 5% of the time, while German macroeconomic expectations are above their historic median (above a ranking of 50%).

    Got inflation? Inflation expectations are falling in the euro area in May and in Germany and, while they edged slightly lower in the U.S., they rank very high - higher only 8% of the time in the U.S. Whereas inflation expectations are lower only about 20% of the time in the euro area and in Germany. What's interesting, is that we see a big decline in inflation expectations in the euro area and in Germany despite the fact that growth conditions either improve or hardly unchanged and macro-expectations for Germany get sharply higher and yet inflation is improving. This has to be viewed as a curiosity.

    Interest rates Short-term rate expectations in the euro area are more negative than they are in the U.S. with both the euro area and the U.S. having low rank standings for short-term interest rate expectations. Long-term rate expectations in Germany and the U.S. show a decline both in Germany and in the U.S., but the German rank-standing is at its 15th percentile and the U.S. standings in its 36th percentile. That, at least, matches with the inflation expectations outlook.

    Through all this, stock markets are improving in May compared to April. The European stock market and the German market are doing better than they are than the U.S. on a queue standing basis. And the dollar is expected to get weaker.

  • Global| May 06 2025

    Global Composite PMIs Erode

    Not many respondents are showing absolute slowing. Only five this month. Only six over the last three months on average. The median total PMI score fell to 49.7 showing contraction in April from 51.1 in March. The average fared slightly better. The 12-months to 6-months to 3-months show a moderate but consistent slowing. The breadth of slowing is wide with 60.9% of survey respondents slowing over three months compared to six months.

    The percentile standings show the most strength for the BRIC group with reading above 50% (that marks the median). All other groupings have standings below the 50% mark indicating that they are below their respective medians of the last four-plus years.

    Over every horizon from 12-months to 6-months to 3-months, more than 50% of the respondents show a weakening (slowing) in their PMI responses.

    Among the largest economies, only Italy has a composite PMI standing above its median (above 50%).

    Only 9 of 24 respondents have PMI ranked percentile standings above the 50% mark. That underlines the weakness in composite conditions and the breadth of the weakness.

    Services sectors no longer are providing the lift to offset ongoing weakness in manufacturing. The differences among countries are narrowing.

    Economic conditions across countries may be narrowing for several reasons, one being that the COVID period and then the shock reaction to Russia's invasion from Ukraine put all countries on the same timeline as central banks have been leaning against the shockwaves from those 2 events. As a result of those events, inflation flared but has more recently been falling. Still, inflation continues to be over the top of targets with the European Monetary Union right now making the most progress and Japan facing more late cycle weakness with excessive inflation than other countries in the mix. More recently aggressive tariff policy the United States has put all countries on their back foot and puts everyone on notice that the future has become a lot more uncertain. Central banks that were progressing toward rate cuts now are worried about the possibility of more inflation from tariffs or from the possibility of recession from tariffs - tariffs up the ante on uncertainty as well as on risk. What we see in this month's PMI statistics is a gradual continued erosion as the perceived risk here is that things get steadily but slowly worse as firms, investors, and consumers began to pull in their horns and prepare for something bad to happen not knowing what that might be.

  • The global manufacturing data showed broad weakening in April as conditions weakened across more than half of the contributing early reporters in the S&P survey of manufacturing. Of the 18 early reporting countries, more than half of them showed deceleration over six months and 12 months. Over three months, only 8 of 18 showed deterioration and that's about as good as it got in this report. In the current month, month-to-month changes showed more than half of the survey contributors showing weaker results than the month before. In the S&P framework, manufacturing improved month-to-month for the U.S.; however, looking at sequential averages for the U.S., U.K., European monetary union, Canada, and Japan, we see a steady weakening and results over 12 months, over six months versus 12 months, and for three months versus 6 months. The highly developed countries are not doing particularly well.

    Asian economies are also showing slight deterioration but doing a little better than the developed countries in general.

    Only five of the 18 reporting countries have queue percentile standings in their data back to January 2021 that are above their medians. Readings at or above the 50% mark are at or above the median standing. Canada is showing the weakest manufacturing result on record over this span, in terms of its queue percentile standing which is at 0 in the current month.

    I showed the graphic for the Baltic dry goods index in this report rather than statistics on the manufacturing PMI data because the Baltic data, which reflect shipping volume for dry goods - that is excluding things like oil - is weak but it's only in the neighborhood where it's been for some time. There has been a great deal of talk about how tariffs may have impacted trade flows, expected trade flows, shipping, shipping rates, and the like. However, according to the Baltic dry goods index, there isn't much evidence that this is occurring right now and affecting the current data. That may still lie ahead but for now it's not baked in the cake.

  • Consumer confidence in Japan in April slipped for all households as well as for the two-person household measure. The index level is now the weakest it's been since early-2023 with the all-household measure at an 8.2 percentile standing on data back to 2004 and the two-person household measure in about the same place, at its 9.4 percentile standing on data back to 2004. Consumers in Japan in April suddenly pulled back their expectations and significantly reduced their confidence.

    The overall livelihood measure in April fell to 27.4 from 30.9 in March and an even higher level in February. Income growth slipped to 37.5 after reaching 38.9 in March and being higher still in February. Employment slipped quite sharply to 36.2 from 40.0 in March and from a slightly higher reading in February. People's willingness to buy durable goods fell to 24.2 from 27.4 in March. The March level was slightly higher than the reading in February; the decline in confidence also corresponded to a decline in the value of assets respondents hold; that reading fell to 34.3 from 40.7 in March and from 42.9 in February. Perhaps a good part of the degradation and expectations has to do with this drop in the value of assets.

    On going drops- sharp declines in train Looking at changes across periods of three, six and 12 months, we see declines on all horizons for the all household and the two-person household measures. In fact, all of the components are consumer confidence our net lower over three months, six months and 12 months.

    The declines month-to-month were extremely sharp. Over the last 253 months (over 21 years), the monthly drop in asset values has been sharper only once. The drop in the livelihood measure has been sharper only six times. The monthly drops are bottom ten events by count except for income growth and employment that are bottom 22 and 13 events, respectively. The headline drops are bottom ten ranking drops month-to-month as well.

    Weak standings as well as sharp drops The rankings for the consumer confidence components are uniformly low. The strongest ranking is for employment that has a 24.5 percentile standing, in the lower quarter of its range. Income growth has a 20.4 percentile standing, at the border of the lower one-fifth amidst a historic range values. The value of assets has a 6.1 percentile standing with the willingness to buy durable goods at a 3.3 percentile standing; the overall livelihood metric has a 1.6 percentile standing.

    Against this background, the standing for the overall confidence index is at its 8th or 9th percentile depending on which of the two overall measures you prefer to emphasize. Clearly the weakness in the survey is throughout the survey. As is the case with surveys in the United States, in Japan the relative strongest readings are for employment, that helps to hold the overall measure from getting as weak as some of its other components weaken. Since employment is an extremely important metric in consumer confidence, its stability helps to stabilize the overall measure. However, for Japan the employment metric, while the strongest of the lot, is still quite weak in the lower 1/4 of its historic ranking and data since 2004.

  • EMU pace steps up- Growth in the European Monetary Union has stepped up in the first quarter of 2025 to a 1.4% annualized pace after slipping into a 1% growth rate in the fourth quarter of 2024. Year-over-year European Monetary Union growth at 1.2% is the same as it was in the fourth quarter of 2024.

    Across the Euro Area- EMU growth as well as across the returns of the early reporters of GDP; there are seven countries that have reported GDP for early release. We see deceleration in growth in Ireland, the Netherlands, and Spain. However, some these are impressive decelerations! In the case of Ireland growth decelerates to a 13.5% annualized rate in Q1 from 15.3% in Q4; even in Spain the deceleration is from a 2.9% pace in the fourth quarter to a 2.3% pace in the first quarter. The final deceleration is from the Netherlands from a 1.1% growth rate in the fourth quarter to a 0.4% annual rate in the first quarter.

    Sometimes, small is good Further parsing the growth rates, the four largest European Monetary Union economies (Germany, France, Italy, and Spain) continue to struggle. The weighted average growth rate for the four-largest economies is 1% in the first quarter; that is an improvement from 0.2% in the fourth quarter of 2024, and compares to 1% in the third quarter of last year as well. The first quarter year-over-year growth rate for Big-Four is 0.7%, the same as it was in the fourth quarter of 2024 (0.8% in Q3 and Q2 of 2024). There is not much change in Big-Four economy growth over the past year. For the rest of the European monetary union growth, quarterly growth decelerated in the first quarter to 2.6% from a very firm 3.2% in the fourth quarter, but even that had been a deceleration from the 3.5% annual rate in the third quarter of 2024. The rest of the monetary union posted a growth rate measured year-over-year of 2.6% in the first quarter compared to 2.3% in the fourth quarter and 1.4% in the third quarter of last year. The smaller economies are making growth progress. It is the large economies in the monetary union that are struggling the most and that are dragging down the growth rate for the monetary union.

    Growth rate rankings- If we rank the growth rates of the European monetary union and the early individual reporters on year-over-year growth and on data back to 1977, we see that the monetary union itself has a growth ranking in the first quarter in its 37th percentile; a 50% ranking would put it at its median for that period- it is short of that. Above-median growth is registered in Ireland with an 89% standing, and in the Netherlands with the 62-percentile standing. Spain also has an above-median result with a 56.5 percentile standing; the rest of the countries are below 50% with Italy the closest to its median at a 47.8 percentile standing. Germany has a 20.7 percentile standing, France had a 26.1 percentile standing, Belgium is at a 29.3 percentile standing. The four largest monetary union economies grouped together have a growth rate with a 26.1 percentile standing while the rest of the monetary union logs of growth rate with a 59.8 percentile standing, significantly above the median of 50%.

    A steep step-back for the U.S. This step-up in growth comes as the U.S. is running out of steam. The U.S. growth rate for the first quarter sank to -0.3% (q/q s.a.a.r.) largely on strong imports, substantially because of pending U.S. tariff policy and goods trying to get in under the wire before the bell tolls for tariff-time (imports subtract from GDP). This was a sharp deterioration from a 2.4% growth rate in Q4 2024 and 3.1% in Q3 2024. The U.S. has a 2.1% growth rate year-over-year, still relatively enviable by the standards of the monetary union members. Still, that quarter-to-quarter drop in the pace of growth from Q4 2024 to Q1 2025 has been weaker since Q1 2022.

  • Money growth trends and the major money center economies are not showing any clear indication toward economic weakness despite widespread pessimism on the part of economists and market prognosticators.

    Money growth is accelerating as its growth speeds up over one year compared to its growth over either two or three years in the EMU, the United States, and the United Kingdom. Credit growth in the EMU also speeds up on this sequence- not usually a slowdown signal. The lone exception here is Japan where its fight against deflation is finally won and morphed into an inflation problem that the Bank of Japan is fighting with its usual gradualism. Japan’s money supply growth slows over two years compared to three years and over one year compared to two years. However, back in Europe, credit growth in the EMU is showing acceleration on this timeline. Japan is the only ‘slowdown signal.’

    We can also peruse the growth rates for real money balances. The EMU, the U.S., and the U.K. show that ‘real money balance’ growth picks up for two-years compared to three-years and accelerates again over one year compared to two-years. Acceleration is in train as real money balance growth transitions from a shrinking profile to positive growth rates in these three countries. Japan is an exception here as it still logs all negative growth rates and these do get progressively weaker (-1.2% over three years to -1.5% over two years to -2.8% over one year).

    Shorter terms trends (for the skeptical) Within the one-year horizons (12-month to 6-month to 3-month), the annualized nominal growth rate in the EMU weaken from 3.4% over 12 months to 2.0% over three months, but real balance growth is nearly unchanged at 1.1% over 12 months compared to 0.9% over three months annualized. Real credit on these time sequences accelerates in the EMU. U.S. real M2 growth generally accelerates from 12-months to 3-months. The same is true for the U.K. but not as steadily. Japan’s progress shows growth rate declines but not getting progressively weaker.

    Through all of this, nominal oil prices are steadily falling. While the pace of decline lets up over two years, the 3-year and 12-month growth rates are nearly identical.

  • Retailing and Wholesaling continue to show wear and tear The United Kingdom’s distributive trades survey has four parts. There's a survey of retailing and a separate survey of wholesaling. Then for each one of these surveys, there's a module that addresses current conditions and another one that addresses expected conditions.

    Current Conditions vs. Expectations for the distributive trades In this month's report, the current conditions assessments improved in retailing but were mixed for wholesaling. Expectations in retailing and wholesaling were also mixed as to month-to-month changes, but the levels of the responses remained quite weak.

    The Specifics Current Retailing- Retail sales compared to a year ago improved sharply to a -8 reading in April compared to a draconian -41 in March. Orders compared to a year ago improved at a reading of -24 in April from -38 in March. Sales for the time of year improved to -31 from -36. Sales compared to a year ago have a below median 29.2 percentile standing, while orders compared to a year ago have a 16.9 percentile standing and sales evaluated for the time of year have a 12.3 percentile standing. In each case, the reading from April is below its median reading of the last 24 years. These readings as a collection are weak readings.

    Expected Retailing- The expected results for retailing in the survey show mixed results. The reading for sales compared to a year ago at -33 in May is slightly weaker than -30 in April. Orders compared to a year ago improved to -29 in May from -41 in April. But the survey shows a deterioration in sales for the time of year at -38 in May compared to -35 in April. The rankings for these readings range between the 10.5 percentile and 4.2 percentile, range marking them as all extremely weak readings in their historic queue of standings.

    Current Wholesaling- Wholesaling also generally shows slippage in April. Sales compared to a year ago fell to -33 in April from in -29 in March, while orders compared to a year ago improved to -32 from March’s -38. Sales for the time of year, which post a reading of -31 in April compared to a reading of -20 in March, demonstrated slippage again. The rankings for these readings range from 4.2 to 9.2 in percentile standing terms.

    Expected Wholesaling- Turning to expectations, sales compared to a year ago nudged lower to -26 in May from -25 in April. Orders compared to a year ago improved nicely to a reading of -28 in May compared to -38 in April; expected sales for the time of year slipped to -28 from April’s -27. Several of these are small stumbles month-to-month. But these readings range from a low percentile standing of 7.7 percentile to a high standing at a 12.6 percentile – all weak metrics.