Haver Analytics
Haver Analytics

Introducing

Robert Brusca

Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media.   Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.

Publications by Robert Brusca

  • United Kingdom
    | Oct 25 2022

    U.K. CBI Orders Erode in October

    U.K. survey gives a mixed view of short-term industrial trends The U.K. survey from the Confederation of British Industry (CBI) on industrial data shows total orders at a -4 reading in October compared to a -2 reading in September and -7 in August. Despite this waffling short-term progression, strength in orders has been slipping more broadly with a 12-month average at +14, a six-month average at +7 and a three-month average at -4. The October orders reading itself has a queue standing on data from 2015 at its 41st percentile, below its median (the median resides at a level of 50th percentile). However, on longer-dated data back to 1991, the queue standing for the orders variable is substantially stronger at its 70.6 percentile, well above its median. The U.K. economy has been relatively stronger since 2015 accounting for the lower standing of the October reading over this more recent period. Evaluated over the longer time series of data, the current reading is less troubling and relatively firm compared to the short-dated observations. These differing baselines make it more difficult to evaluate the U.K. readings with confidence.

    The U.K. situation However, none of these observations mask the fact that the U.K. economy is weakening and that it faces turmoil in its financial markets, weakness for the pound sterling, and political difficulties, having just placed its third Prime Minister in office this year. Inflation in the U.K. remains high although it shows signs of having peaked and, perhaps, it is ready to move lower. But current inflation in the U.K. is too high and the task ahead for the Bank of England is made more difficult by the fact that the economy has weakened.

    The rest of the current survey The CBI survey shows weak export orders at a -14 reading in October from -8 in September and -12 in August. This series has an average of -4 over 12 months as well as over six months that deteriorates to an average of -11 over three months. The order series for exports has a queue standing in its 37th percentile on data back to 2015 but improves to a 55.4 percentile standing on data back to 1991. One reading has a weak standing; the other is moderate

    Stocks of finished goods have an October reading a +7 compared to +6 in September and +2 in August. The 12-month average is -7, rising to -1 over 6 months and to +5 over three months. Inventory levels are showing some signs of having been rebuilt. With orders fading, this may not be a desired trend.

    The outlook Looking ahead, the U.K. output volume reading for the next three months has improved to +7 in October from -17 in September and -2 in August. However, looking back at the time series, the average over 12 months is 16, the average over six months is +6 and the average over three months is -4. The sequential averages show that there's a deterioration in the outlook for output volume three-months ahead even though the October monthly figure itself shows a strong turnaround from a very weak reading in September. We know enough about the U.K. economy, and its difficulties to be somewhat skeptical about the notion that there has been a sharp turnaround in the output volume outlook.

    One of the reasons that the output outlook for the U.K. economy remains difficult and strained is because of inflation. In October the outlook for prices three-months ahead fell to 46 from 59; the August reading had been 57. The 12-month average for the outlook for prices three-months ahead is 64 following a reading of 57 over six months and 54 over three months. There is a monthly progression showing pressure is coming off prices and a sequential average progression that reinforces that trend. That's good news; however, the price level numbers are still extremely strong. The price reading for October- despite its decline- still has an 83.3 percentile standing on data since 2015 and a 96.6 percentile standing on data from 1991. That's the inflation part of the outlook. Output volume over the next three months has only a 33.3 percentile standing compared to data since 2015 and only a 40.8% standing compared to data since 1991. Either way the look-ahead for output volume is below its median despite the fact that that series has improved in October. Inflation improvement is too small to be construed as good news yet.

    Industrial output readings lag but tell a clear story At the bottom of the table, we include the summary data for U.K. manufacturing output. The most up-to-date reading for that is in August and it shows a 1.6% drop month-to-month. The three-month change in output shows a 13.2% drop at an annual rate, the six-month change shows an 8.1% drop at an annual rate, the 12-month result shows a 6.7% drop. These progressive growth rates show how industrial output has been declining more rapidly over recent periods. And the ranking of the IP data over either period is unambiguously weak in the lower 2.7% of its queue on either timeline. However, the output data themselves from the industrial production indicator are only up to date through August. The CBI survey is up to date through October. But it is unlikely that those trends have turned around in any significant way because of the clear forces have been battering the economy and because of the impact on financial markets.

  • PMI data for October are weak on a broad front, falling for all composites in the table except for Japan and falling in all these sectors except for manufacturing in the U.K. and for services in Japan. In September, the U.S. is the exception with stronger readings for the composite, manufacturing, and services. Japan has a stronger composite and services reading in September as does France, but the United Kingdom, Germany, and the European Monetary Union all show weaker readings for all three components. In August, there are weaker readings for all the composites and most of the components with the exceptions only for manufacturing in France and manufacturing in the U.K. that both were stronger in August compared to July. The picture that emerges from this is widespread weakening.

    Three-month, six-month, and twelve-month data in the table I bet it's turn hard data they exclude the October reading which is a flash reading. Based on these averages, all the three-month readings are weaker than all the six-month readings. The six-month readings are weaker than all the 12-month readings except in Japan where both services and the composite are stronger. Over 12 months, there's more variability with 10 of the 18 readings stronger on the month.

    High-low standings The percentile standing which positioned the month’s reading relative to the high-low readings since January 2018 show relatively moderate and positive standings. The U.S. is the exception with a 48.6 percentile standing. Japan logs a 94th percentile standing; France logs an 80th percentile standing; the European Monetary Union logs a 71.4 percentile standing. However, these are the current index paced in a range relative to the highest and the lowest readings during this period. It's a much more powerful reading to look at the ranking of the current month among all the readings since January 2018.

    Queue standings The queue standings rank the current month among all the readings since January 2018 and here the rankings changed remarkably. Japan has the highest composite standing at its 72nd percentile. After the Japan reading, it drops all the way down to a 27.6 percentile standing in France and from that we're down to a 6.9% standing in the European Monetary Union, in the U.K., and in the U.S. There's clearly a proliferation of weakness. 11 of 18 queue percentile standings reside below the 15th percentile mark.

    The net drops in PMIs In October, the unweighted change among this group of countries and the EMU is for the composite to fall by 1.2 points, for manufacturing to fall by 0.9 points, and for the services reading to fall by 1.1 points. Over three months, the average drop is 1.9 points for the composite, 3.1 points for manufacturing and 1.9 points for services. Over 12 months, the average drop is 6.5 points for the composite, 8.9 points for manufacturing and 6.6 points for the composite.

    Comparisons to pre-COVID levels Compared to just before COVID struck, in January 2020, there are only four readings in the table that are above that January 2020 level. They are all the readings for Japan and the manufacturing reading for Germany – the German reading is higher by only 0.4 points. On average, since January 2020, the composites are weaker by 3.6 points, manufacturing is weaker by 1.4 points, and services are weaker about 4.0 points. The boom-bust cycle related to COVID has now left us at a net weaker level. Not only are the PMI readings weaker but they're decaying; they have more negative momentum.

  • The GfK measure of consumer confidence in the UK rebounded slightly in October to a -47 reading from a -49 level in September- which is its all-time low. The two-point bounce is extremely small given the weak level of the September reading. The outlook for the period ahead, over the next 12 months, sees slight improvements in the household financial situation and for the general economic situation, although both continue to have extremely weak readings when it set against the background of their historic range of values. Both those readings are weaker historically less than one-half of one percent of the time. Both readings reach all-time lows in September and rebound weakly in October. The outlook for unemployment continued to be moderate and fell in October.

    Retail sales are weak - Keep your eye on volume data The background in terms of the consumer confidence is extremely weak. It's not surprising that sales in September fell by 1.5% in nominal terms and by 1.4% in real terms. Over 12-months nominal sales are up by 3.8%, while real sales - sales volumes- are down by 6.9%. Inflation has become an extremely decisive factor in understanding anything in the UK economy. For example, the ranking of the year-over-year sales rate has a 60.2 percentile ranking in its historic queue of data. That’s a moderate reading, above its historic median. On the other hand, the ranking of the year-on-year percent change in real retail sales (volume) has a 0.8 percentile standing- a standing in the bottom 1% of its historic queue of data. Clearly, to understand what's going the inflation adjusted data are the way to go - and these data are weak.

    Sales volumes are weak, and weakness is accelerating Retail sales data show a decline of 6.9% over 12 months, they show decline of 8.2% at an annual rate over 6-months, and a decline of 11.4% at an annual rate over three months. UK retail sales are slipping, and they're rate of decline is accelerating. The economy appears to be careening toward recession with consumer spending this weak it would be hard to imagine the economy continuing to expand. In the quarter to-date retail sales volumes are down at a 7.3% annual rate; the volume number completes the economic picture for the third quarter. ONS has reported a DGP decline from July and August and has noted that growth of 1% in the economy for September would be necessary to prevent a quarterly decline. The recession cake appears to be in the oven and nearly baked.

    UK CBI survey confirms weakness Surveys of UK retail sales show marked deterioration in September compared to August, a Confederation of British Industry CBI) report shows. Retail sales for the time of year record a survey level of -10 compared to +12 in August. The CBI volume of orders measured year-over-year also shows a net negative -17 reading in September compared to +14 in August.

    The queue standings for these CBI readings are still not as weak as the retail sales volumes themselves. The retail sales for time of year have about 45-percentile standing while the volume of orders year-over-year has a weak 18.6-percentile standing. The CBI survey does show encroaching weakness, however, the weakness in real retail sales appears to be much more severe than what's being picked up by the survey at least as of September. And the survey in September took a sizable turn for the worse compared to August, so it could be that retailers are just beginning to appreciate the depth of their problem situation.

    Summing up Economic conditions in the UK clearly are weakening. Inflation rate is high; over 3-months (using the HICP as a benchmark) inflation is up by 6% and while that's down from the year-over-year pace of 10.1% it's still a high inflation rate and, in September, the measure advanced by 0.4% month-to-month not an indication that pressures are cooling very much. However, the Bank of England has a difficult job because the inflation rate is high and yet the economy is cooling – on the brink of recession. This will call for a very careful modulation of policy to control rising inflation and not to exacerbate the economic slide that appears to be underway. The UK also has political leadership problems: the recent resignation of the Prime Minister just set a record for the shortest term in the history of British politics. Now the government needs to reconvene and pick a new leader at a time that economic conditions are difficult and their choices, once again, are going to be contentious. The UK finds itself between a rock and a hard place at a time that global inflation is high, the global economy is sliding, there's a war in Ukraine, and energy prices continue to hover at high levels. It's not an enviable situation but it is what they face – a lot of tough choices.

  • Germany's PPI for September excluding construction rose 2.4% after a 7.9% monthly gain and in August and a 5.3% monthly gain in July. The three-month growth rate for the headline PPI is an astounding 83% annualized, as well as a 49% annual rate over 6-months and a 45% annual rate over 12-months. However, 12-months ago the year-over-year rate was rising at a 66% annual rate. Germany has been fighting off this headline inflation problem from the PPI for quite some time.

    The ex-energy inflation rate is much better behaved, but not without its problems. The PPI ex-energy rose by 0.5% in September after a 0.4% gain in August and in July. Over 3-months it's rising in a 5.1% annual rate, compared to an 11% annual rate over 6-months and a 13.8% annual rate over 12-months. One year-ago the PPI excluding energy was rising at an 8.6% annual rate.

  • United Kingdom
    | Oct 19 2022

    UK CPI Continues Hot

    The UK inflation metric for September continues to run hot. The CPIH has increased by 0.4% in September after rising by 0.3% in August and 0.7% in July. Its three-month rate of growth is at 5.7%, clearly excessive, relative to the 2% target of the Bank of England, however, there is substantial deceleration from the 6-month annualized pace of 9.4%; the 3-Mo pace also is weaker than the 8.8% pace over 12-months. Still, one year ago this month this measure was increasing at a 2.9% annual rate also above target but this month’s year-over-year gain of 8.8% as well as its lower 3-month pace exceeds the year-over-year pace from a year ago.

    The same measure excluding food alcohol and tobacco (that I will refer to as the core) increased by 0.4% in September after rising 0.5% in August and 0.4% in July. This measure runs at a 5.6% annual rate over three months and has accelerated compared to 6-months where the rate was 5.2% annualized. The 5.6% pace compares to a 12-month pace of 5.8%, barely any deceleration at all.

    Core shows mixed results: the 6- and 6-Mo pace are off peak; 12-Mo still accelerating All the acceleration in the UK CPI measure over three months is in the core reflecting a diminished rose for energy and food prices; core inflation continues to run hot and shows no real sign of deceleration as it runs at a rather steady too-strong pace.

    The diffusion calculation which measures the breadth of inflation across 10 categories plus the core measure shows diffusion at 45.5 in September. For diffusion, the key value is ‘50.’ Above 50 more than half of the components are showing inflation acceleration period to period. Whereas, below 50, more of them are showing deceleration. These measures are comparing the breadth of inflation’s rise or fall in one period to another period. In August, inflation accelerated with diffusion at 54.5 indicating marginally more acceleration than deceleration for the inflation rate. But then in July, despite a headline gain of 0.7%, and a core gain of 0.4%, the month-to-month diffusion measure clocked 27.3 indicating a broad step down in inflation compared to the month before (when the headline rose 0.8% and the core by 0.7% month-to-month).

    Sequential data show diffusion at 63.6 over 3-months compared to 6-months. The 6-month measure shows diffusion at 54.5 compared to its 12-month pace. Over 12-months diffusion is at 100 indicating acceleration in inflation across all the categories compared to the inflation rate of 12-months earlier.

    The sequential numbers show us that inflation is not simply the matter of one or two categories that are accelerating because the breadth of inflation is clearly across most categories and is not the result of some intense increases in just a few categories with large weights that are driving the headline higher. This is the sort of information that diffusion can deliver to us.

    **The United Kingdom continues to have inflation problems **with strong inflation represented in the headline pace and the core pace and across all the sequential time horizons. UK inflation trends muddles without a clear-cut patterns and with the pace of inflation, however measured, simply far too high. The inflation news may not be terrible and may not be a lot worse this month than last month...but it’s not any better either. At the same time the economy is facing weaker growth; that combination of events puts the Bank of England in a difficult spot. UK policy is in an extremely challenging situation. The government's intended fiscal plan has been forced to be withdrawn after it had adverse market effects. But the central bank will certainly stay on a tightening path but will be able to move in a more measured pace because of the encroaching weakness of the economy and some of the financial market jitters that have emerged.

  • The Zew economic indicators for the macro economy for the Euro-Area, for Germany, and for the US decline significantly in October. The Euro-Area diffusion reading fell from -58.9 in September to an October reading of -70.6. In Germany, the diffusion index deteriorated to -72.2 in October from -60.5 in September. And the US deterioration was from a +1.2 reading for September to -13.4 in October. These are substantial deteriorations. They have left the Euro-Area with a queue standing in it's 18.9th percentile, Germany in its 19.1 percentile, and the US and its 31.4 percentile. These are reading that have been lower only one third to one-fifth of the time (The US has the less weak standing).

    Economic expectations for Germany and the US showed mixed trends. For Germany, the macroeconomic expectation reading improved very slightly to -59.2 in October from -61.9 in September. This reading still leaves it below the August-22 level. And the US the macroeconomic outlook deteriorated to 45.6 in October from 39.6 in September. Both the German and the US queue standings post October readings that are extremely weak. The German reading has been this weak or weaker 1.4% of the time; the US reading has been this week or week or 5.7% of the time – not much difference.

    Inflation expectations that had revived a little bit in September have been sharply reduced in October as their trend decline continues. The Euro-area inflation expectations reading fell to a -35.8 diffusion index reading in October from -12.1 in September; in Germany inflation expectations fell to -35.2 in October from -9.7 in September. In the US inflation expectations fell to minus -71.0 in October from -50 in September. The Zew financial experts are coming to fear inflation less as they come to recognize weaker macroeconomic conditions and as they continue to hold extremely weak expectations for future growth. Inflation expectations have been reduced to a 4.4 percentile standing in the Euro-Area, to a 14.8 percentile standing in Germany and to a new all-time series low in the US. This does not mean inflation is going away; but it means the assessment is that there is a high probability that inflation has peaked. At some point diminished economic activity and poor expectations for the future must result in less inflation pressure.

    However, on the interest rate front for the Euro-Area we see a diffusion reading of 92.6 in October compared to 93.3 in September it's a small reduction that probably doesn't really mean anything because the readings are still so high- in the 90th percentile. Clearly the Zew experts continue to see the ECB raising rates. And in the US also there's a slight diminution of pressures in short term rates as the October diffusion index falls to 87.3 from 89.7 in September. That's another very modest and not noteworthy change in expectations. And the case of the Euro-Area, that diffusion reading is in its 98.9th percentile. For the US, the reading is in its 91st percentile. In both cases expectations for higher short-term rates are extremely strong. And that is more the point than that there was some very modest backing off.

    Moving on to long-term rates, we see pressure coming off long term rates expected in both Germany and in the US. In October, the German diffusion index falls to 48.7 from 55.2 in September. In the US, the reading falls to 40.6 in October from 50.7 in September. The lower diffusion readings imply less pressure on long term interest rates. In Germany, the standing of that diffusion index is in its 60.9 queue percentile, showing that expectations for long rate increases are above their historic median ( the median occurs that at a queue standing at the 50th percentile). In the US, the queue standing is at its 41st percentile, below its historic median.

    Stock market expectations have improved slightly for the Euro-Area area and in Germany; they are marginally weaker in the US. In the Euro-Area stock market expectations flip from a - 5.2 reading in September to a + 2.5 reading in October. Similarly, in Germany, the October reading flipped to a +1.2 reading from a -5.9 reading in September. The US the October diffusion reading edged down to 11.7 from a September reading of 12.5. The Euro-Area and German readings are still both in the lower two percentile of their historic queues of observations for stock market expectations. And in the US the reading is a bottom 25 percentile reading at its 25.7 percentile mark. These are weak queue percentile standings for all three areas; however, the weakest standings are for Germany and the Euro-Area.

  • Japan's industrial output surged in August with manufacturing output rising by 3.5% month-to-month after rising 0.8% month-to-month in July and rising 9.1% month-to-month in June. The three-month growth rate is off the charts at 68% annual rate. That compares to an annualized growth rate of 8.3% over six months and of 4.3% over 12 months. Clearly there is some catch-up going on with industrial production. Japan is planning stimulus programs for its economy.

    Surveys show some mixed progress, but lag the strength in the IP report Survey data for August failed to show the same kind of enthusiasm as the industrial production report, which showed an upward revision in today’s release. The economy watchers index, a diffusion index report, rises to 45.5 in August from 43.8 in July with its future index rising to 49.4 in August from 42.8.

    Sector indexes from Teikoku, another diffusion report, show manufacturing slipping to a diffusion reading of 41.0 in August from 41.3 in July; retailing steps up to 36.3 from 35.7; wholesaling slips slightly to 39.2 from 39.5; services move higher to 45.4 from 44.4. The construction sector is better by just a few ticks at 43.3 in August compared to 43.1 in July.

    The METI indexes for industry and services both showed monthly gains.

    Growth vs. activity levels Evaluating the economy watchers and on the Teikoku indexes by their growth rates, we'll find more strength in the economy watchers survey.

    The economy watchers indexes show rankings based upon year-over-year growth in the 90th percentile for the headline index, for the retail sector, for eating & drinking places, and for the service sector readings. However, if we evaluate those same sectors based on the levels of the indexes, since these are diffusion indexes, we get a view of the level of performance rather than an assessment of growth. The economy watchers index has a 33.6 percentile standing for its level, below its historic median; the retail sector has a 40.6 percentile standing; eating & drinking places have a 15.4 percentile standing; the services sector has a 25.9 percentile standing. Viewing employment overall, employment increased to a diffusion reading of 52.5 in August from 50.7 in July, with the growth ranking in its 73.4 percentile but with an index standing that is much weaker, in its 42.7 percentile. Pitting the growth rankings against the index level rankings, it's quite clear that Japan is still relatively weak in terms of performance, and this is what the index level ranking tells us. However, the growth ranking tells us that there has been a spurt which has not yet elevated growth to a strong position but there has been a spurt that has boosted the economy short term.

    The Teikoku indexes show somewhat the same phenomenon with the growth rankings generally above the diffusion index level rankings. The manufacturing sector is an exception with a growth ranking at its 42nd percentile and an index level ranking nearly the same at the 43rd percentile. But retailing has a 74.1 percentile growth ranking compared with 37.1 percentile level ranking; wholesaling has a 60.8 percentile growth ranking compared to a 44.1 percentile index ranking; services have an 80.4 percentile ranking on growth compared to a 39.9 ranking on its index level.

    Separately, the METI indexes shown improvement for industry on the month and an improvement for the tertiary (or services) sector month-to-month. The growth rankings of these two sectors put industry in the 88th percentile and the tertiary index growth rank in its 95.7 percentile. However, the levels of these surveys show index rankings in the 52nd percentile for industry and in the 39th percentile for services, both significant step backs.

    Orders Japan orders failed to confirm the near-term strength in growth as in August total orders, core orders and foreign orders all fall sharply with only domestic orders moving up by 1.9% month-to-month. The growth ranking for orders reverses the earlier trends. The total growth ranking on year-over-year growth is 34.7%; however, the level of the index is at its 90.9 percentile. Core orders have a 66.9 percentile ranking on growth, compared to a 91.6 percentile on levels. However, the orders data aren't comparable to the other data in the table since orders are an ordinary accounting time series that adds up the value of orders; orders are not a diffusion index. The other series are diffusion indexes that measure output breadth. Over time we naturally expect an orders series based upon ordinary data to grow and therefore the level index will tend to grow even if it's growing insufficiently. Diffusion industry indexes don't have that same property.

  • The trade deficit in the European monetary area fell to 47.3 billion euros in August from a 40.5 billion deficit in July. The surplus balance on manufacturing trade is reduced to €16.1 billion in August from €16.6 billion in July. Most of the deterioration in the trade balance came in nonmanufacturing trade, as the August balance on that account widened to €63.4 billion from €57 billion euros in July.

    The European Monetary Union trade balance has been slipping at a very rapid rate. The 12-month average is -19.7 billion euros, over six months that expands to -€33.9 billion and over three months it's at -€40.3 billion. The three-month average is twice the 12-month average. The surplus balance on trade in manufacturing has slipped steadily but more modestly from a €22.3 billion surplus over 12 months to an €18.8 billion surplus over six months and then to a €17.2 billion surplus over three months. These are period averages of the surpluses. On the same timeline, the nonmanufacturing balances have gone from a €42 billion deficit over 12 months to a 52.7 billion deficit over six months to a €57.5 billion deficit over three months. Over the broader sequential period, just as over the last several months, the deterioration is mostly in nonmanufacturing trade pointing the finger at commodities and the increase in commodity prices and particularly the price of energy goods internationally.

    Not surprisingly, this trend is built on a weakening trend in exports and a withering trend in imports as well, but with export growth rates much lower than import growth rates throughout. Export growth rates transition from a 21% annual rate over 12 months 2 a 19% annual rate over six months, to a 6% annual rate over three months. For imports, there's a 51% annual rate over 12 months that stabilizes at about 52% over six months and then slides to a 36% annual rate over three months. In both cases, the growth rates for exports and imports are declining; however, the import growth rates simply swamp and dwarf the growth rates for exports.

    We can look at these growth rates separately for manufacturing and for nonmanufacturing trade and while the numbers are different the trends are not particularly different.

    For manufacturing trade, export growth slows from 18% over 12 months to 10.5% over six months to 7% over three months. For imports, manufacturing growth rates log 29% over 12 months, 29% over six months and 15% over three months.

    For nonmanufacturing trade, export growth rates log 37% over 12 months, 64% over six months and then drop sharply to 3.7% over three months. For imports, the 12-month growth rate is 110%, the six-month growth rate is 105%, and over three months that pace steps back to a growth rate of 81%. Nonmanufacturing trade is clearly seeing nominal flows expand much faster than manufacturing trade. The action is really on the import side where the growth rates are typically twice or more the growth rates on the export side for nonmanufacturing goods. It's clear from these statistics that inflation is what's really driving the deterioration of this trade account of the European Monetary Area.

    Separate country level statistics for Germany and France tell the same story although with less of a gap between the export and import growth rates themselves. For Germany, exports expand at a 14% pace over 12 months, at a 21% pace over six months and fall back to a 15.5% pace over three months. For imports the growth rate is 29% over 12 months, 33.5% over six months and that over three months imports fall very sharply and leave their growth rate below that for exports at a 6.4% annual rate. For France, exports grow at a 20.9% annual rate over 12 months, at a 6.1% rate over six months and at a 15.3% rate over three months. For imports, the 12-month growth rate is 30.9%, over the six months the growth rate is 25.1%, and the three-month growth rate at 19.5% is only a few percentage points above the growth rate for exports.

    Other European growth rates focus on exports. In the table, we have growth rates for Finland, Portugal, and Belgium. These export growth rates generally fall from about 30% over 12 months, down to a pace about 25% over six months. And then over three months, in Finland export growth declines at a 7.1% annual rate, in Portugal exports decline at a 16.1% annual rate and then Belgian exports expand at a 3.2% annual rate over three months. Export growth clearly slows in all three of these countries- exports decline over three months in two of them. We see evidence in these flows of weakening demand globally against the earlier EMU, French and German evidence of still strong nominal import demands.

    For the U.K., a different picture emerges, with exports having a 27% growth rate over 12 months, a 58% growth rate over six months and a 24% growth rate over three months. U.K. imports grow at a 29% pace over 12 months, faster than exports, but then slip sharply with 10.7% annual rate over six months and then slip again for 1.1% growth rate over three months. These figures reflect the slowdown in the U.K. economy and the onset of recession. There is going to continue to be slowdown for demand in the U.K. market. There's also a sharp weakness in the pound sterling on the foreign exchange markets that will affect U.K. trade flows in the near term. However, with the possibility of a J curve effect operating in the short term, we might not see that in the next few months data, immediately, but further U.K. trade improvement should play out over the next six to 12 months.

  • If there are any inflation deniers out there, it is well past time for them to 'man the lifeboats' and make an emergency evacuation from this point of view. Inflation is raging and is accelerating sharply. In Germany – once a paradise of solid price stability- inflation over 12 months is 11% rising, at a 10.6% pace over six months -barely indicating any abatement, and then jumping to a 16.2% annual rate over three months. These are not just accelerations of inflation from a depressed base. One year-ago the German HICP was up by 4.2% year-over-year. At the time, people were arguing that inflation rate was distorted. Ha! Little did they know…

    Of course, Germany is not in control of its own inflation rate anymore the way it once was because it's part of the European Monetary Union and tied into this basket of countries that has different inflation tolerances and different economic and fiscal arrangements as well.

    EMU is what it is... The European Monetary Union is a monstrosity formed based on an idea by Robert Mundell on something he called an 'optimum currency area (OCA).' And like many things in economics, this concept was used to justify the formation of a 'European Monetary System' even though the members of this system do not qualify as an ideal OCA based on the criteria that Professor Mundell had set forth for such a union to be successful. For one thing, in their zeal to have a common currency, Europe was never ready to pull its fiscal fortunes together. There is no overarching fiscal policy as each country runs its own fiscal house although there are rules that can be used to bring countries back to fiscal morality when they stray. The reality, however, has been that it is only in the wake of Europe having employed this rule to discipline fiscal laxity that countries were put under severe stress and pressure and the European Central Bank eventually was pressed into service to make policies that have been far more inflationary than anyone would like to sustain the union.

    German inflation and recession The German domestic inflation rate is officially put at 10% and there's a new record pace of inflation since Germany has been reunified. But for those of you who remember history, we know that Germany has suffered far worse inflations than this as Germany's hatred of inflation stems back to its pre-War era of hyperinflation. The Bundesbank now looks for Germany to enter recession and it also recognizes that inflation is too high, and it urges - and expects - the ECB to be raising rates by another substantial amount at its next meeting. However, quite clearly the toothpaste is out of the tube. The Bundesbank argues that the economy will suffer a recession, but it will not be a severe recession. That's a curious argument. When we combine the notion of recession in the German economy with the ECB raising interest rates sharply, and with the energy shortages being experienced, it's hard to know why the Bundesbank would want to stick its neck out to say that the coming recession would be relatively mild. It seems that the risks are for relative severity.

    Inflations in Germany is broad – not isolated or concentrated Inflation diffusion for in Germany in September shows inflation went up across about 59% of the categories; this is a sharp acceleration from August where it went up in only 31.8% of the categories; in July it went up in only 9.1% of the categories. During these three months, Brent oil prices measured in euros fell by 5.3% in September, by 6.8% in August, and by 7.3% in July. We know that oil prices don't get into the CPI index immediately, but this has been a period in which oil prices are falling. In fact, oil prices fall on balance over six months and over 12 months. Yet, the inflation statistics for Germany are ugly

    The inflation diffusion across categories over three months, six months, and 12 months shows inflation extremely broad on the order of 70% to 80%. That means over those time horizons inflation (annualized) is rising in 70% to 80% of the major CPI categories. Specifically, I calculate diffusion as derived from the three-month percentage change compared to the six-month pace and then the six-month pace compared to the 12-month pace, and then 12-month pace compared to the pace over 12-months in the comparable month of one year-ago. On all those comparisons prices are broadly accelerating across CPI categories.

    Core inflation accelerates Core inflation for the HICP rises from 6.3% over 12 months to a pace of 8.4% over six months to a pace of 12.6% over three months - those are all annualized rates and they're all extreme. The domestic CPI excluding energy accelerates from 6% over 12 months to 7.8% over six months to 11% over three months also showing sequential acceleration, the same message as from the HICP core.

  • The U.K. economy is suddenly experiencing a world of hurt. With a new government and a budget change that was not well received and then was retracted, the financial markets have been under pressure. The Bank of England has been active trying to stabilize financial markets. However, there's only so much you can do with band aids chewing gum, and a stapler.

    Transition to greater weakness The economy has transitioned into a more serious state of decline. The rate of decay makes it look like it's already in recession. In August manufacturing industrial production fell by 1.6% following declines of 1% in July and 0.8% in June. Industrial production figures are adjusted for inflation, so these are real declines and the real decline in the U.K. industrial production is now 6.7% over 12 months. IP is falling at an 8.1% annual rate over six months and falling at a 13.2% annual rate over three months. These are substantial negative growth rates, and they are accelerating and there are declines across all sectors. The deceleration in growth also is across nearly all sectors, with two exceptions. Capital goods are a very minor exception because the year-over-year fall of 8.7% slows down slightly to a 7.8% rate of decline over six months before resuming at a 9.5% rate of decline over three months. Consumer durable goods also fail to show sequential deterioration but continue to show a good deal of weakness. Consumer durable goods output declines by 4.2% over 12 months, at an accelerated 6.4% annual rate of decline over six months, but then it slows to an annual rate of decline of 1.6% over three months. However, both consumer nondurable goods and intermediate goods show sequential real declines and acceleration in the rate of those declines over six months and three months, rounding out the picture of a fast-weakening manufacturing sector.

    QTD growth U.K. data trends also show quarter-to-date declines and all the sectors show manufacturing output falling. Manufacturing output falls at a 10.9% annualized rate, two months into this quarter. Consumer nondurables has the sharpest decline in its QTD growth rate among sectors at -10.1%, but intermediate goods output at -9.4% is close behind, as is capital goods within a decline at an 8.5% annual rate. Consumer durables output is falling at a 4.5% annual rate, about half the pace of decline the other sectors.

    Sectors ae mostly lower since Covid struck U.K. output has fallen sharply over the past year; the table documents it's down significantly over 12 months as are all the sector measures. As a result of those declines, U.K. output is now lower than it was pre-pandemic in January 2020. All sectors except for consumer nondurables show net declines as well. Consumer nondurables output is still 5% above where it was in January 2020. Overall output shows a short of its January 2020 level by 1.3%; capital goods output is the farthest behind, at 6.4 percentage points below its output level in January 2020.

    Industry weakness is broad-based The bottom of the table shows trends for five key industries in the U.K. Only two of these industries fail to show sequential deterioration. One of the exceptions is textiles & leather where after falling by 5.9% year-over-year output trends fall at only a 2.6% pace over six months but then they collapse to fall at one of the stronger negative growth rates of -21.6% over three months. In the end, which makes it not much of an exception.

    Not surprisingly utilities are an exception, but they still aren't very strong. Utilities output is up by 7.1% since before Covid struck. Sector output is up by 1.9% over 12 months. Growth in the sector is moderate to weak except for the 6.4% annual rate over six months. But after that, it's back to dead flat over three months. The monthly pattern for electricity, gas & water shows declines in August and July after a significant 2.7% increase in June.

    Food, beverages & tobacco are up by 10.3% on that same timeline to before the point that Covid struck. But textiles & leather output is 13.1% lower, mining & quarrying is 14.4% lower and motor vehicle & trailer production is lower by 35.2%. The bottom line is since Covid only food and utilities output have expanded.

  • Australian business confidence in September fell to 4.8 from 9.9 in August. It was as strong as 7.6 in July. Business conditions, in contrast, improved to 24.7 in September from 21.6 in August and 21.9 in July. Forward orders increased to 14.7 in September from 13.7 in August and 11.3 in July. Despite the one-month drop in confidence, business conditions and forward orders show improvement.

    Monthly changes in the components can be erratic, but the three-month averages show a decline in business confidence. Business conditions components show declines in exports and in exporters’ sales in September and modest gains for the three-month average compared to the six-month average. September data focus on foreign weakness as an impediment.

    Over both three months and six months, confidence deteriorates as conditions improve. The 12-month average compared to 12-month ago shows declines in business confidence as well as business conditions.

    In September, most observations are above their historic means. The exception is the reading for confidence itself; it is a tick below its mean value. Among components exports are below to their historic mean with a -1 reading slightly below the mean of -0.8 for the period back to May 2002.

    Ranking statistics show a good deal of strength. The overall confidence measure has a relatively weak reading with the rank standing in its 38th percentile. This compares to a three-month standing at its 56th percentile and a 12-month average standing in its 63rd percentile. These progressions show that as we look at more recent periods the standing of the confidence index is weaker; there has been some loss of momentum in confidence.

    Business conditions are mostly strong However, among components of the business conditions reading, most rankings are in the 90th percentile and higher. The exceptions are the relatively low rankings for exports with a 41.6-percentile standing and exporters sales with the 39.2 percentile standing.

    However, there are also high standings for metrics that are not favorable for the outlook: labor costs have a 98-percentile standing, purchase costs have a 97-percentile standing, and prices have a 98-percentile standing. There are strong expectations for inflation and, in addition to that, stocks have a very high 99.2 percentile standing. If stocks are full, firms are less likely to be ordering and filling up inventories further.

    Still, forward orders have momentum. In addition to moving higher, their percentile standing is at the 97.6 mark in its historic queue of data. The readings on activity and inflation both are high giving rise to some uncertainty about what the future will look like.

    Looking at changed comparing three-month averages to six-month average, some of the biggest changes in these components have come from improvements in trading conditions and from stocks. In contrast, orders are only up by 0.3 points over three months compared to six months, one of the weaker categories. To the extent that some of this begins to look like congestion, the good news is that capital expenditures are relatively strong; the three-month to six-month change logs a 1.6-point gain, the fourth largest among business conditions components. Firms are investing.

    One of the hallmarks of this report is that business confidence has been fading and it fell relatively sharply between August and September. But its smoothed three-month moving average climbs over three months compared to six months and over six months compared to 12 months. Over those periods business conditions themselves have been improving.

  • Netherlands
    | Oct 10 2022

    Dutch IP Steadies Its Pace of Growth

    Dutch industrial production fell by 2.7% excluding construction in August. It logged a gain of 0.9% in July and another of 1.7% in June. Utilities output fell by 5.8% in August after falling 4.3% in July and 4% in June - there is a much longer broad string of weakness here related to Europe’s energy problems. The weakness in utilities casts a pall over performance of the rest of the economy as well as prospects for the manufacturing sector and other sectors looking ahead. What can you do without energy? Go Green go…fight green, fight…win green… win? And now the pipeline is kaput, too.

    Mining & quarrying activities saw output fall by 5% month-to-month in August after gaining 8.5% in July and falling 6% in June.

    Manufacturing output fell by 2.2% in August after gains of 1% in July, and 2.6% in June. The manufacturing PMI changes for the Netherlands have seen declines in August, in July, and in June, in terms of their month-to-month changes- the level readings are still very high with the manufacturing reading still at 65.7 in August even after a series of monthly drops.

    Sequential growth rates for output Sequential growth rates for industrial production in the Netherlands show some recent weakness over three months, but there is not a clear pattern of ongoing deceleration. For example, for overall industrial production excluding construction output falls at a 1.2% annual rate over three months but it gains at 6.1% pace at an annual rate over six months and that's an acceleration from a 5% pace over 12 months. Utilities output continues the dismal trend we see in the monthly data with output falling at a 27.1% annual rate over 12 months, at a 36.7% annual rate over six months, and at a 44% annual rate over three months. Mining & quarrying also show a descent into weakness with an 8.4% gain over 12 months giving way to a 6.1% annual rate of decline over six months and an 11.8% rate of decline over three months.

    Manufacturing gets back to a more ambivalent trend with output up by 9.2% over 12 months, then accelerates to a 13.1% annual rate over six months, before decelerating to a 5.5% annual rate over three months. The sector ‘food & beverages’ shows declines on all three horizons and clearly demonstrates deceleration. Textiles, on the other hand, show ambivalent trends with acceleration over six months spoiling a deceleration trend. Transportation equipment output shows a clear deceleration with output down 26.7% over 12 months, falling at a 62% annual rate over six months and then falling at a nearly 80% annual rate over three months.

    The manufacturing PMI Still, over the sequential period, the manufacturing PMI average for the Netherlands is higher over three months than over six months (barely even comparing averages) and higher over six months than over 12 months and higher over 12 months than it was 12-months ago. The PMI data which address breadth are showing improvement in breadth over these periods even though the strength has encountered a string of monthly weakness.

    Growth after Covid Growth in the Netherlands has not been particularly robust in the post COVID era. From January 2020 before the Covid virus hit, the headline series for industrial production is unchanged. Manufacturing, however, is up by 4.2% over that period, a span of a year and one-half. Utilities output falls by 23% compared to that benchmark while mining & quarrying activity falls by 15.7% from that benchmark. Manufacturing output is higher on balance, the food & beverage sector is lower by 7.8%, textile output is lower by 2.6%, and transportation equipment output is lower by 42.8%.

    Quarter-to-date growth In the quarter-to-date, the headline series maintain their momentum. Industrial production excluding construction is up at a 4.3% annual rate in the third quarter-to-date. Manufacturing output is up at 10.8% annual rate in the quarter-to-date. Textile output still strong showing a strong gain at a 15.6% annual rate; however, there is a severe negative downdraft in the transportation sector and from utilities.

    Ranking Dutch IP growth rates and sector growth Ranking the various industrial production components based on their annual growth rates since 2017 put the overall IP growth rate in the top 10% of all annual growth rates seen on that period at a 90.7 percentile standing. Despite recent setbacks, mining & quarrying is also strong with a 96-percentile standing. Manufacturing has a 90.7-percentile standing. And the growth of output from textiles over the last 12-months has a 72.2-percentile standing, still a firm reading. But for the remaining sectors, there is no halfway about it. Utilities output shows the weakest year-over-year percent change on this entire timeline. The output in the food & beverage industry has been lower only about 7 1/2% of the time. The year-over-year output change for transportation equipment has been weaker only 3.7% of the time. However, as an overall measure of manufacturing, the manufacturing PMI continues to be a very strong signal logging a level at its 90.7 percentile on data back to 2001.