U.K. Retail Sales Weaker Than Expected
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30c4d/30c4d77d782665f3248b14f58c11415eaac501a3" alt="20220916A3.jpg"
Retail sales in the United Kingdom fell by 1.7% in August after rising 1.5% in July and 1% in June. Sequentially growth rates for nominal retail sales grow by 5.3% over 12 months, at the same 5.3% annual rate over six months, and slow to a 2.9% annual rate over three months.
However, that doesn't begin to tell the story since inflation is raging and driving the nominal numbers higher. Retail sales volumes fell by 1.6% in August, rose by 0.4% in July and fell by 0.2% in June. Retail sales volumes are falling by 5.3% over 12 months, falling at a 6.3% annual rate over six months and falling at a 5.4% annual rate over three months. In each of these sequential periods, retail volumes decline. They decline at a pace of 5% or somewhat greater in each period. While retail sales in the U.K. continue to deteriorate, the pace of deterioration remains more or less steady; it's not increasing and it's not diminishing. However, compared to a year ago, the decline in sales volumes is greater because the year-over year-volume decline of one year ago was at a 4.4% annual rate.
In the current quarter-to-date (QTD), retail sales are posting a strong-seeming gain at a 7.3% annualized rate. However, these are nominal sales and the inflation rate in the U.K. is high. Retail sales volumes QTD show a contrary 3.9% annual rate decline. These calculations are for the months of July and August taken over the second quarter base for sales. They reflect an ongoing contraction in retail sales volumes. Based on the two (of three months) quarterly data, there may be a slight let up in the pace of decline in retail sales in the third quarter.
Economists have an expression for nominal values particularly when inflation is high. The references to something called ‘money illusion.’ It's the illusion that because something costs a lot more money there's more of it. For example, the standings of the growth rate of nominal retail sales is in the 84.6 percentile. The gain in nominal retail sales would seem to be in the top 15% of all sales gains since August 2001 the period of overwatch these standings are calculated. That would be strong. However, if we apply the same ranking criteria to the growth in sales volume, retail sales volume has quite the opposite 2.4-percentile standing. It is real sales- sales once we account for the effects of inflation- that are weak. They have been weaker than this only about 2.4% of the time and they have been higher than this over 97% of the time.
Passenger car registrations have rebounded after a prolonged period of weakness they rose by 9% in August and 17.8% in July after falling by 5.9% in June. Past year car registrations are up by only 0.9% over 12 months; they're falling at a 23.9% annual rate over six months, and they are rising at a 113.3% annual rate over three months. Clearly there is a recent surge in registrations that still hasn't elevated the level of passenger car registrations materially.
The table also presents some survey data on U.K. retail sales. The survey data show retail sales for the time of year assessed as slightly stronger in August than in July; the volume of orders year-over-year has made a significant improvement compared to July showing a change of 14 compared to a change of -5. By comparison, consumer confidence in August fell by 3 points after being flat in July; these are calculations of month-to-month changes in underlying indexes.
Sequential data show simple changes over each period in the heading; for example, retail sales for the time of year show the index improved by 3 points over three months, while it fell by 13 points over six months and fell by 23 points over 12 months. The volume of orders year-over-year survey value fell by one-point over three months, compared to falling by 10 points over six months and 67 points over 12 months. Consumer confidence fell by 4 points over three months, by 18 points over six months, and by 36 points over 12 months. Clearly the year-over-year results show a great deal of weakness in each of these survey metrics. The quarter-to-date shows some increase in retail sales for the time of year as there is an 11.3-point change for the better, compared to the volume of orders series that declines by 1.7 points, and consumer confidence that decline by 2.8 points. The queue standings for the surveys are executed on level data, not on change data. Retail sales for the time of year has a standing at its 71.9 percentile. Volume of orders year-over-year are assessed at 49 percentiles standing, just below its historic median. The consumer confidence reading stands at an all-time low on data back to August 2001.
U.K. retail sales are weak. The nominal numbers dress up the results, but the volume numbers speak clearly to the reality of weakness and enduring weakness and U.K. retail sales. The series on passenger car registrations has been extremely weak but is undergone some significant rebound over the last two months. Inflation in the U.K. continues to run hot; that means there will be more rate hikes ahead and more weakness for the economy and for retail sales in the future.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ecbef/ecbefa5399ea5cc7fea4cfacd87dff5782a838f7" alt="220916table.png"
Robert Brusca
AuthorMore in Author Profile »Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media. Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.