Introducing

Robert Brusca

Robert A. Brusca is Chief Economist of Fact and Opinion Economics, a consulting firm he founded in Manhattan. He has been an economist on Wall Street for over 25 years. He has visited central banking and large institutional clients in over 30 countries in his career as an economist. Mr. Brusca was a Divisional Research Chief at the Federal Reserve Bank of NY (Chief of the International Financial markets Division), a Fed Watcher at Irving Trust and Chief Economist at Nikko Securities International. He is widely quoted and appears in various media.   Mr. Brusca holds an MA and Ph.D. in economics from Michigan State University and a BA in Economics from the University of Michigan. His research pursues his strong interests in non aligned policy economics as well as international economics. FAO Economics’ research targets investors to assist them in making better investment decisions in stocks, bonds and in a variety of international assets. The company does not manage money and has no conflicts in giving economic advice.

Publications by Robert Brusca

• 

  Europe| Sep 14 2022

  EMU IP Falls in July, Driving 3-Mo Growth Rate to a Decline

  Industrial sector performance in the European Monetary Union has turned decidedly dicey. In July total output excluding construction foundered, falling by 2.3%: manufacturing output fell by 2.1%, consumer goods output rose by 1.2%, with intermediate goods output falling by 0.8%, and capital goods output falling by a large 4.2% month-to-month. This is a lot of weakness. Within the consumer goods sector, durable goods output fell by 1.6% as nondurable goods output rose by 1.2%. Across these same sectors, output mostly fell in June while output rose uniformly in May. As a result of these comparisons, we don't have any clear trend, but we do have a lot of volatility in output with the best of strength in the oldest observations.

  Divergent overall and manufacturing trends Turning to sequential growth rates, overall industrial output falls by 2.2% over 12 months. The fall is nearly the same at minus 2.3% annualized over six months while over three months the pace of decline is reduced to -0.4% at an annual rate. For manufacturing, output actually accelerates. Over 12 months output falls by 2.6%, over six months it falls at a 1.9% annual rate, and over three months it increases at a 1.1% annual rate.

  Suspicious manufacturing trend However, the manufacturing results don't appear to be particularly robust. For example, over three months manufacturing output may be rising, but overall consumer goods output is falling. Within consumer goods, durables, and nondurables output both log output declines. Output falls for intermediate goods. The increase in industrial output comes entirely from an outsized rise in the output of capital goods of 5.7% in annual rate. As a result of those numbers, the manufacturing IP progression from weakness to strength is created by only one sector. Only capital goods output has a progression of accelerating growth among the three sectors (and the two consumer sub-sectors). Capital goods output falls by 3.5% over 12 months, falls at a 1.9% annual rate over six months and then rises at a 5.7% annual rate over three months.

  Quarter-to-date trends indicate more pronounced weakness In the quarter-to-date (QTD) - a calculation that looks at the growth rate in July over the second quarter average calculating a true growth rate from the middle of that quarter - there's a decline in output overall at a 6.8% annual rate. There's a decline in manufacturing output at a 6.2% annual rate as well; there are declines in each manufacturing sector, and sub-sector, over the QTD period. This, of course, is different from the three-month calculation that you look only at output this month compared to the level of three-months ago. The QTD growth rate, calculated over the second quarter base, has the advantage that as further quarterly data come are released, each new observation compares output to that same base in Q2. As we add another month and then finally a third month of data and the change is driven by the new data not by a shift in the base. The QTD calculations give us a bit of a better idea how growth is evolving in the quarter per se.

  The dispersion of growth Among the 13 early reporting European Monetary Union members, 8 show output the declines in July, 7 show output declines in June, and 5 show output declines in May. That's a clear progression toward worse results. Sequential data show 7 countries with output declining over three months, 6 with output declining over six months, and 6 with output declining over 12 months. However, as is the case for manufacturing output, the QTD calculations find more weakness with 9 countries showing declines in output on a QTD comparison. Here it's easiest to point to the exceptions. The exceptions are Malta with a 55% growth rate, output in Greece logs a 28% growth rate, and output in Belgium posts a 6.6% growth rate in output with Germany at a 0.2% growth rate of output growth. The median change in output for the quarter to date is minus 7.6% annualized. In the quarter-to-date calculations, 3 of the 4 largest EMU economies show declines for early Q3, with Germany, obviously, being the exception. Across all the monthly and sequential periods in the table, there are output declines persistently in two or three of the four largest EMU economies (Germany, France, Italy, and Spain)

  by:Robert Brusca

  |in:Economy in Brief
• 

  United Kingdom| Sep 12 2022

  U.K. Trade Deficit Shrinks As Exports Outpace Imports

  The goods trade deficit for the United Kingdom struck £19.36 billion from £22.85 billion in July compared to June. The deficit has been steady with an average of £18.5 billion over 12 months, £21.5 billion over six months and £21 billion over three months.

  U.K. export growth has been volatile but has been strong. Nominal exports are growing at a 26.6% pace over 12 months, at a 58.1% annual rate over six months, and at a 23.9% annual rate over three months. Nominal imports are up by 29.4% over 12 months, slowed to a 10.7% pace over six months and slowed further to a 1.1% annual rate over three months.

  Real flows monthly Real trade flows for the U.K. demonstrate very different patterns from the nominal flows. Real exports still outperform imports in July, growing by 6.8% over June compared to a 3.7% drop in real imports. In June both real exports and real imports fell with real exports falling 9.3% month-to-month and real imports falling 3.2% month-to-month.

  Real flows sequentially The sequential trends for real exports and real imports show real exports persistently growing while real imports have turned to a pattern of declines. Real exports are up by 4.3% over 12 months, up at a 26% annual rate over six months and up at a 3.4% annual rate over three months. This compares to real imports that are up by 8.8% over 12 months and are stronger than real exports. But over six months real imports fall at a 13.6% annual rate, and they fall again over three months at a 16.4% annual rate.

  Commodity composition of real trade flows Real exports Commodity categories tell a significant story about trends in the U.K. Exports show steady gains in capital goods with the 3.2% gain over 12 months, and an annual rate of growth at 14.5% growth over three months. Road vehicles show a steady to strong acceleration, rising at a 9.9% annual rate over 12 months, gaining at a 40.9% annual rate over six months and accelerating again to a 72.1% annual rate over three months. Basic materials fail to trend consistently but fall by 4.8% over 12 months and are declining at a 44.7% annual rate over three months. Foods, feeds, beverages & tobacco echo the trends for basic materials although they rise by 3.2% over 12 months and then fall at a 16.6% annual pace over three months. Both basic materials and foods, feeds, beverages & tobacco show solid gains over six months, then give those gains up over three months. Those gain keeps those flows from having any kind of a steady trend in play.

  Real imports On the import side, capital goods imports grow at a 12.7% pace over 12 months, which increases slightly to 14.2% at an annual rate over six months and then slips to a 6% annual rate decline over three months. Road vehicles show steady deceleration of imports, logging growth of 25% over 12 months, falling to a pace of 11.3% annualized over six months and logging a 39.5% annual rate decline over three months. Basic material imports are also in a fairly steady state of decline. They decline over all horizons, falling and 11.8% annual rate over 12 months, the slowing that drop only very slightly to a 10.5% annual rate of decline over six months and then accelerating sharply to a 61.3% annual rate decline over three months. Food, feeds, beverages & tobacco show declines over two of the three horizons; imports rise by 3.8% over 12 months, then slip at a 6.8% annual rate over six months and then decline at a more moderate 1.5% annual rate over three months.

  Trends in perspective What these trends clearly show is extremely weak import growth over three months; all three-month growth rates for the import categories are negative over three months. Overall imports decline over six months too although that decline is not as broad based. Over 12 months imports see a somewhat broader increase in real terms. By comparison, exports grow at a moderate 3.4% pace in real terms over three months with the declines in only two of the categories while over six months the export gain is solid at 26% with increases across all the commodity categories. The 12-month performance of exports is moderate with the growth rate of 4.3% and with a decline in only one of the featured categories.

  by:Robert Brusca

  |in:Economy in Brief
• 

  France| Sep 09 2022

  French Manufacturing Falls in July -What's Next Is Unclear

  Manufacturing industrial production in France fell by 1.6% in July after advancing 0.9% in June and by 1% in May. Production is up by 0.2% over 12 months; however, it falls at a 3.1% annual rate over six months and then rebounds to rise at a 3.9% annual rate over three months. The French trend for production is not yet clear or established.

  Sector performance in French manufacturing also shows mixed trends. Consumer durables output was up by 0.6% in July after falling in June; however, the June decline came after a strong surge in May. Consumer nondurables output fell by 1.5% in July after rising by 1% in June and falling by 0.3% in May. French capital goods output fell by 1.4% in July after rising by 1.2% in June and rising by 1.5% in May. Intermediate goods output fell by 2% in July after rising by 0.8% in June and rising by 1.0% in May.

  The sequential trends for sector data also vary widely. Consumer durables output in France is accelerating strongly from a 5.3% annual rate over 12 months to an 8.9% annual rate over six months to a 30.1% annual rate over three months. Consumer nondurables, however, are losing momentum; that sector's output rises by 1.1% over 12 months, but falls at a 3.5% annual rate over six months and continues to fall at a lesser, 3% pace, over three months. Capital goods has output up by 0.5% over 12 months; it declines at a 0.7% annual rate over six months then rebounds to post a strong 4.9% annual rate of growth over three months. Intermediate goods output falls by 1.9% over 12 months and falls more substantially at a 6.8% annual rate over six months. That pace of the decline for intermediate goods output is sharply trimmed to -0.8% over three months but it's still a decline.

  On balance, sector trends in manufacturing show great strength in consumer durables, with lingering weakness in consumer nondurables, moderation in capital goods that is topped up by strong three-month performance despite a decline in July. Intermediate goods show a steady diet of declines in output.

  by:Robert Brusca

  |in:Economy in Brief
• 

  Japan| Sep 08 2022

  Japan's GDP Is Revised Up from 2.2% Q/Q to 3.5%

  Japan's second quarter GDP was revised up to show growth of 3.5% at an annual rate compared to the previous estimate of 2.2% - an upward revision greater than what had been expected. Japan's year-over-year GDP growth in the second quarter is now up to 1.4% from 1% previously. The 1.4% growth rate is the strongest since the second quarter of 2021 when GDP rose at a 7.3% year-on-year rate after declining in the first quarter under the pressure of COVID policies.

  Japan's quarterly growth Private consumption growth in the quarter was revised up to a 4.8% growth rate from 4.6% previously. Public consumption in the second quarter grew at a 2.8% rate annualized compared to 2.2% previously. Private sector consumption continues to be the principal driver of GDP growth.

  Gross fixed capital formation in the quarter grew by 4.9% at an annual rate compared to 3.4% previously. Plant & equipment spending rose to an 8.3% annual rate, up from 5.8% previously as investment demand heated up in the quarter. However, the housing estimate was little changed in the second quarter with revised housing investment falling at a 7.3% annual rate compared with decline at a 7.2% annual rate previously. Housing continues to lag and to contract.

  Export growth was unrevised, rising at an annualized 3.7% pace quarter-to-quarter while imports were weaker, rising by 2.2% compared to 2.7% previously. Weaker import growth adds slightly to GDP growth.

  Japan's domestic demand was stronger at a 3.2% annual rate in the second quarter compared with its 2% pace previously.

  Annual rates of growth Upon revision Japan's economy is looking firmer and stronger than it was previously. Still, year-on-year growth is up at a modest 1.4% for GDP while domestic demand is up at a 1.6% growth rate over four quarters. Consumption continues to drive GDP; the year-on-year increase in private consumption is up by 3% compared to 1.9% for public consumption. Year-on-year gross fixed capital formation is falling at a 3% annual rate over four quarters marking the fourth straight quarter in which gross fixed capital formation logs a year-on-year decline. Plant & equipment spending is flat year-over-year in the second quarter, and that's an improvement from its previous pace of -0.8%. Year-on-year housing investment is down by 6.3%, marking the third quarter in which the year-over-year growth rate is negative for housing investment. The year-on-year trend for exports continues to diminish; exports grow at a 2.5% pace over four quarters; that's the fourth quarterly deceleration in a row for the year-over-year growth rate for exports. Imports are up by 3.3% over four quarters. Imports grew at a 7.3% pace in the first quarter; second quarter growth is the weakest annual import growth since the first quarter of 2021. Japan's domestic demand which rose 1.6% over four quarters is slightly stronger than the 1.4% gain it made on that same basis in the first quarter and stronger than the roughly half a percentage point gains logged in the fourth quarter of 2021 and in the third quarter of 2021. But domestic demand is only firmer and doesn't show any clear signs of acceleration.

  by:Robert Brusca

  |in:Economy in Brief
• 

  Germany| Sep 07 2022

  German Manufacturing Output Falls in July; Unwelcome News Comes Early?

  German industrial output fell by 0.3% in July after gaining 0.8% in June and falling by 0.1% in May. These figures, of course, do not reflect the freshest news in Europe concerning the shutting of the gas pipeline from Russia. Germany is beginning to take some steps as it has agreed to keep open two of three nuclear power plants that had been scheduled to be mothballed. Still, it's keeping open only two of three not three of three and it appears that Germany is still not willing to pull out all the stops to find alternatives to the gas that they're losing from Russia even though more nuclear power would mean that Germany could burn less gas to generate electricity and make up for some of the loss from the Russian pipeline. Green still has power in Germany. When winter comes, the new motto could be ‘let them burn furniture.’ That happened a year ago in the U.S. when Texas had a pronounced and severe cold snap and the electric grid failed. Reality lurks and action shirks. Germany needs to think right now about what winter is going to be like if the pipeline stays shut- it needs to act now.

  Monthly results Energy is going to be a concern for the future; what's unfortunate is that as of July Germany logs a decline in industrial output, led by a 2.4% decline in consumer goods output, a 0.8% decline in capital goods output, and a 0.6% decline in intermediate goods output. All this is ahead of any energy shortage. Construction sector output also fell by 1.3% in July. Manufacturing output fell by 1.0% in July. What’s next when energy is in short supply?

  German output trends German output trends are not quite as bleak, but they're not very encouraging either. Growth rates from 12-months to six-months to three-months show industrial output falls by 1.1% over 12 months, it falls at a 4.2% annual rate over six months, then it gains at a 1.6% pace over three months. Three-month output declines for consumer goods and intermediate goods, but those declines are dominated by a sharp rebound in capital goods output. Manufacturing output declines 1.4% over 12 months and drops at a 4.2% pace over six months; however, it expands at a 3.4% annual rate of increase over three months.

  German orders point to weakness Manufacturing orders, which are highly correlated with manufacturing output, show a 13.7% decline in real orders over 12 months, at 17.8% annual rate decline over six months and a slower, 6.2% annual rate decline over three months. The pace of decline does diminish over three months, but it's still a significant pace of decline. Meanwhile, the monthly data show increasingly large declines in orders from May to June to July.

  Sales trends Real sales in manufacturing show a convoluted pattern with a 1.1% gain over 12 months, a 4.1% annual rate drop over six months, and a sharp 17.3% rate of increase over three months. The three-month increase is based on a 2.5% increase in May, a 3.4% increase in June, but then tempered by a 1.8% drop in July.

  Industrial indicators German industrial indicators are not encouraging. The ZEW current index weakens from 12-months to six-months, to three-months. The IFO manufacturing index, the IFO manufacturing expectations index, and the EU Commission industrial index all follow suit. The monthly patterns are equivocal, but they generally show declining activity month-to-month from May to June to July.

  Other Europe Other European countries have issued early industrial output reports: they show mix patterns. Portugal shows declines in each of the last three months compared to Sweden where there are increases and accelerating increases across the last three months. Norway shows accelerating activity over each of the most recent three months as output moves from a 2.2% decline in May, to a 0.2% increase in June, to a 1.4% rise in July. However, the sequential performance of these countries across broader spans is mixed and less encouraging. From 12-months to six-months to three-months, Norway shows sequential deterioration. Sweden shows sequential acceleration- and some real strength. Portugal shows a mixed pattern ending in weakness over three months. Only Sweden shows an increase in output over three months, while Portugal and Norway report declines in output over three months.

  QTD: Quarter-to-Date July marks the start of data in a new quarter; the early read shows an increase in output at 1.2% annual rate in the third quarter over the second quarter base for Germany. Sweden and Norway show significant increases over their second quarter output bases while Portugal shows a sharp decline. German indicators, early in the third quarter, also report declines compared to their second quarter values. The German construction sector shows a decline QTD as well. All manufacturing orders show a decline QTD; manufacturing output rises at a skinny 0.2% annual rate. Real sales in manufacturing are up at a robust 7.5% annual rate- a marked contrast.

  by:Robert Brusca

  |in:Economy in Brief
• 

  Global| Sep 06 2022

  Composite PMIs Weaken in August

  Among the 25 entries in the table for composite PMI values in August, only 6 show month-to-month increases in August. Those showing improvement are Italy, Sweden, India, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Egypt. Three of them are countries in the Middle East, India was another, Sweden, a northern European economy, and Italy, a Mediterranean European Monetary Union member, was the final member of this group. There's nothing special that stitches them together apart from the three Middle Eastern countries that are geographically concentrated and that benefit from the ongoing high oil prices in the world economy.

  In July only seven countries had improved month-to-month and in June on the eight countries had improved month-to-month; for the most part these were different groups of countries although Russia improved in July and June, Saudi Arabia improved in August and June, Ghana improved in July and June, Egypt improved in August and July, all of the rest of the cases were isolated.

  Similarly, over three months only nine countries have improved compared to six-months; none of them were among the group of the largest economies in the table. Over six months nine countries improved compared to 12-months and year-over-year 11 countries improved compared to the 12-month period earlier; that count still falling short of representing half of the group.

  The percentile standings show that a large proportion of the August values still reside in the upper portion of the full range of values these countries have had in their PMI composites from January 2018 to date. However, if we look at the queue percentile standings that place the August value in a particular spot in its historic queue based upon the number of observations above and below it, rather than based upon the maximum and minimum values in the range, we get a very different result. That result reveals the month's readings to be quite a bit weaker than range standings suggest. Fully 16 of the 25 values in the table reside below their historic medians which means on a queue percentile basis they have rankings below their 50th percentile. Most of them, in fact, are far below their 50th percentile indicating extremely weak standings. Nine of the 25 members have percentile standings in the lower one-fifth up their historic queue of data. That means that they have been stronger than their August values 80% of the time or more. Only two countries have percentile standings in the top 10% of their queues: those are India and Saudi Arabia.

  The composite – service sector plus manufacturing sector- PMI paints a picture of the global economy that is weakening and paints a picture of a global economy that is already weak. At the bottom of the table, average and median data for benchmark countries and aggregates provide more perspective. The unweighted average for the U.S., the U.K., the European Monetary Union, and Japan has a PMI value of 48.2 in August and 49.8 in July; both indicate that those countries on an unweighted average basis are showing contracting economies based on the averaged composite PMIs.

  These are composite PMIs not just the manufacturing sector; they include the broad services sector and therefore they're broad gauge of these economies. PMI data can differ from ordinary economic data which I referred to as accounting data since GDP and traditional statistics tend to count the data rather than to deal with the sorts of breath statistics that PMI data are based on. However, the two data presentations do tend to give us many of the same signals and the PMI data based on breath are well known to be sensitive to changes in economic conditions; they can serve the role of a canary and a coal mine to warn us when something is starting to go wrong.

  The unweighted average for the U.S., U.K., EMU and Japan readings progressed from 53.4 over 12 months to 52.6 over six months to 50.2 over three months that's a clear weakening. For the Bric excluding Russia, the pattern is different: 52.3 for the 12-month average, slipping to 52.2 for the six-month average, but then rising to 54.7 over three months. The average for the full 25-member group slips to 53.0 over six months from 53.6 over 12 months and again to 52.3 over three months. The median for the full set of countries also shows slippage from 53.8 over 12 months to 53.0 over six months and to 51.8 over three months. Both the median and the average measures for the full data set show slippage.

  However, when it comes to contraction, August shows only 10 of 25 jurisdictions below 50 compared to 7 in July and 4 in June. Over three months only six averages show below 50 values compared to five over six months and 5 over 12 months. This is a starkly different comparison from slowing. Statistics on slowing show 19 jurisdictions slowing in August compared to 17 in July and 17 slowing in June compared to May. Over three months 16 jurisdictions slow compared to six-months, and in six-months 16 slow compared to their 12-month values. Over 12-months, however, only three jurisdictions slow compared to 12-months earlier. Slowing is extremely widespread; but contraction is still not very widespread, occurring in its most frequent month of August in only 10 of 25 of these reporting jurisdictions – still that's 40%.

  by:Robert Brusca

  |in:Economy in Brief
• 

  Global| Sep 01 2022

  Global Manufacturing Slows Further (S&P Global PMIs)

  Among the 18 countries and regions surveyed in August, 13 of them worsened month-to-month. That’s a clear bias in terms of numbers of countries that saw manufacturing weaken in August. Among the exceptions were Indonesia, China, Russia, France, and Turkey.

  Over three-months compared to six-months, once again there are 13 members of this group that show worsening. Over six-months compared to 12-months, there are 16 members that show worsening. Over 12-months compared to the average from 12-months ago, there are eleven members out of 18 that show worsening.

  The median observation in August deteriorates only 0.2% from the month before. Over three-months, the median observation deteriorates by two points from the six-month average. Over six-months, even though there are more worsenings than improvements, there is a slight, 0.4%, improvement in the median observation compared to the 12-month average. And over 12 months, despite the lowest worsening count of all these horizons, there was a decline in the median of 1.7 points.

  Queue rankings On balance, the worsening is gradual and ongoing, but it is bringing the manufacturing PMI levels down to much lower levels. If we look at the queue rankings over the last 4 ½ years, there are only four out of 18 members whose August observations rank above their median values over the last 4 ½ years. Those are Russia, India, Indonesia, and Malaysia. As for large economic areas, the euro area has a 32.1 percentile standing, the U.S. has a 22.6 percentile standing, the U.K. has a 3.8 percentile standing, Japan comes close to its median with the 49.1 percentile standing, and China has a 17-percentile standing.

  PMI values since before Covid struck Half of the respondents in the table have higher manufacturing PMI standings than they did in February 2020 on the brink of COVID striking. However, the euro area, Germany, France, and the U.S. show increases that are improvements of barely one point or less over this span of 2 ½ years. The strongest gains from February 2020 are from Japan that’s up by 3.7 PMI points, and Russia that’s up by 3.5 points. After that, Vietnam is up by 2.2 points (based on its July reading), and Malaysia is up by 1.8 points. All-in-all conditions have not been very robust over the last 2 ½ years.

  by:Robert Brusca

  |in:Economy in Brief
• 

  France| Aug 31 2022

  France: the Developing Inflation Cycle Bends Lower

  The French statistical agency has released its preliminary HICP estimate for August; the month shows a flat inflation performance compared to July. Unfortunately, August shows only the observation on French inflation for the headline. We really can't dig into the details on why things changed that much in August compared to July. However, the headline shows the 12-month inflation rate in August dipped to 6.5% from July's 6.8%. For France in August the year-on-year inflation rate is decelerating. And the gain of 6.5% year-over-year in compares to a 2.4% pace in August one year ago. While inflation was excessive a year ago, it was excessive in a moderate sense. This makes it clear that the overshoot from inflation is really a recent phenomenon with these very high inflation rates reflecting events mostly over the last 12 months. Sequentially inflation now shows a 6.5% pace over 12 months, a 7.6% pace over six months and a lower 5.7% pace over three months. That is the new August profile.

  Trends as of July The rest of the table concerns how French inflation looks at the up-to-date statistics through July and earlier. In July, the core rate had increased by 0.8% from June's 0.2%, an acceleration even as the headline had cooled to a 0.5% July gain compared to 0.8% in June.

  The sequential calculations on the HICP core show inflation have accelerated from a 4.3% pace over 12 months to 5.8% over six months to 6.2% over three months. On that same timeline, the CPI excluding energy for France accelerated from 4% over 12 months to 5.4% over six months to 5.6% over three months-roughly like the core path in the HICP framework. The CPI headline for France is on the same time dimension in the other data in the table, except of course for the headline of the HICP.

  The headline of the CPI shows both acceleration and the deceleration. The 6% annual gain over 12 months accelerates to 8.4% over six months then it decelerates to 7.5% over three months. This, of course, is a contrary pattern to both core measures both of which are in the same timeline as the CPI headline.

  The French domestic CPI could be translating the recent weakness in Brent oil prices into a somewhat slower headline gains for the CPI. Brent prices have decelerated over the three months ended in July, rising only at a 12.8% annual rate after rising at a 72% annual rate over six months and at a 61% annual rate over 12 months. In fact, in July the month-to-month change in the price of Brent expressed in euros fell by 10.8%. One thing all central banks are looking forward to is getting some relief on their inflation from what has been weakening energy prices even though the longer-run outlook for energy remains quite difficult as many countries have stuck to their ‘Green agendas' despite the pain of it. In the euro area, there is added concern about energy supplies let alone price.

  In the most recent month for which we have detailed data (i.e., July 2022), we see declines in three categories among the 11 detailed and the CPI report. Prices fall month-to-month for healthcare, transportation, and communications. Healthcare prices have been weak for some time in France; they fell by 0.6% over the last year and in the previous 12-month period they had fallen by 1.7%. This is a structural change in healthcare prices. Transportation prices fell by 0.4% in July after rising by 3.3% in June; they have been ramping up at a double-digit pace over three months, six months and 12 months because of the contribution to energy costs from rising energy prices. Communication goods include a lot of technology. Technology alone helps to moderate communications prices; those prices are up by 0.1% over 12 months and up by 1.9% in the previous 12 months. In addition to their fall in July, communication prices were flat in June.

  France saw some inflation pressures too. Month-to-month inflation for restaurant & hotel prices rose by 1.8% in July after rising 0.4% in June. Food prices are still strong rising at 1.3% month-to-month after June's 1.3% rise. Food price gains are still in double digits over three months and accelerating. Restaurant & hotel prices are also in double digits over three months and six months, and they also are accelerating. This reflects the return by consumers to the restaurant and hotel sector after COVID had essentially redlined that sector for a prolonged period.

  by:Robert Brusca

  |in:Economy in Brief
• 

  Japan| Aug 29 2022

  Japan's LEI Waffles Sideways-Sets a Weak Path

  Japan's leading economic index for June was at 100.9, down slightly from May's value of 101.2. The index has been waffling and in a sideways motion (see Chart) since early-2021. The growth rates show a 12-month growth rate of minus 2.5%, a six-month annualized decline of 3.8%, and a three-month annualized increase of 0.4%. Over 24 months, there's an increase of 21.9%- not annualized.

  The LEI report still has two components missing for June, the loan/deposit ratio change and the normalized overtime in manufacturing metric. Only four of the six components are up to date in June. While they call this statistic a 'leading indicator,' it is working off data from May and June and here we are just a few days from September.

  Monthly changes Share prices moved slightly lower in June compared to May, falling by a skinny one tenth of a percentage point. The interest rate spread was unchanged in June holding at 100.2. The dwellings-started metric is also unchanged at 100.3. The export-import balance shows a slight improvement to 99.9 in June from 99.8 in May. The April to May shift in the two lagging components finds the loan-to-deposit ratio a tick higher and manufacturing OT (overtime) unchanged.

  Overall, the LEI and its components paint a picture of a Japanese economy that is very little changed on several of fronts. The biggest change in the economy has been the ongoing decline in the yen because of monetary policy in the United States. U.S. monetary policy has been moving rates up sharply and progressively; that has had a substantial impact on the dollar that has been moving up against all major world currencies especially against the yen and the euro. At some point, Japan should reap some benefits in terms of export growth although it's going to cost Japan in terms of import prices and that becomes more of a problem because as Japan does import a lot of energy that is priced in world markets in dollar terms. However, Japan is taking steps to revive its previously mothballed nuclear facilities to reduce its dependence on imported hydrocarbons.

  Trends Looking at the trends across the components of the leading economic index, among the six components, three of them show increases and three of them show declines over three months. Two of the indexes showing increases over three months are the lagging metrics; only one of the topical indexes shows an increase; i.e., the export-import balance. Over three months, share prices are down at a 0.8% annual rate, the interest rate spread is down at a 0.2% rate, and dwelling-starts are declining at a 0.5% annual rate. The two lagging indicators show little change over three months in May. The loan/deposit ratio is up by 0.4% annualized over three months while the OT gauge (overtime) for manufacturing is up at a 0.2% pace.

  Over six months, only one of the components declines and that is share prices. However, the interest rate spread and dwellings have very small 0.1% to 0.2% increases. The export-import balance index improves by 0.5% while the lagging loan/deposit index is up at a 0.7% pace and manufacturing OT is up at a 1.3% pace.

  Over 12 months, share prices decline by 0.7%; all other metrics show improvement.

  The net change over 24 months reveals declines in the loan/deposit ratio and in the export-import balance. The lagging manufacturing OT is up by a strong 3.7% with a 1.4% rise in dwellings-started, a 0.8% improvement in share prices, and a one tick rise in the interest rate spread.

  LEI vs. Confidence Comparing the LEI to the consumer confidence readings, we find that consumer confidence also fell in June. And it also declined over 12 months, six months and three months. The LEI and consumer confidence measures demonstrate shared weakness over the last year. Yet, both are up strongly over 24 months, by 10.3% for confidence and by 21.9% for the LEI.

  by:Robert Brusca

  |in:Economy in Brief
• 

  Germany| Aug 26 2022

  GfK Backs Down Again in September

  The GfK consumer climate index for Germany has fallen, reaching a new lower low in September at -36.5. This is a drop from August when the index was at -30.9. The index dropped from its previous all-time low to a new lower low in September. The monthly decline of 5.6 points is the biggest monthly decline since May of this year and represents real month-to-month deterioration, not just some further slippage. A month-to-month decline larger than 5.6 points occurs less than 2% of the time…and this is a drop from what had been an all-time low

  The components for the GfK index lag by one month; we have component values for August as the most up-to-date readings. The August reading for economic expectations improved slightly to -17.6 from -18.2 in July. The August reading for economic expectations stands in the lower 11th percentile of its historic queue of data. Income expectations also improved slightly, logging a -45.3 reading in August compared to -45.7 in July. The July reading was the all-time low for the income series so the ranking for August income expectations is in the lower 0.4 percentile of its historic queue of data. The propensity to buy reading for August slipped further to -15.7 from -14.5 in July; this reading has a lower 17.6 percentile queue standing.

  All the components are weak. The propensity to buy is in the lower 20th percentile of its queue of data, economic expectations are in their lower 11-percentile while income expectations are just a few ticks off their all-time low, logging the second lowest reading on record. These are not encouraging signs for Germany or for the consumer.

  Other Europe There are also readings for Italy, France, and the U.K. in the table; these are up to date through August. In Italy, consumer confidence improved to 98.3 in August from 94.8 in July. In France, the INSEE reading moved to 82.2 from 79.6. But in the U.K., there was deterioration as the consumer confidence reading fell to -44 from -41 to reach a new all-time low for U.K. confidence.

  by:Robert Brusca

  |in:Economy in Brief
• 

  France| Aug 25 2022

  INSEE Business Indicator Falls; An Unremarkable Report But One That Urges Vigilance

  The INSEE business indicator for French industry climate fell to 103.6 in August from 105.6 in July. The index had been at 107.9 in June and 106.3 in May. The decline in August brings it down to a significantly lower level compared to where it's been in recent months. The indicator has a 63.3 percentile standing in its historic queue data back to 2001. This is a moderate standing above the median which occurs at a ranking of 50.

  Manufacturing production expectations post a -1.6 reading in August, an improvement from July's -5 reading and from the readings of June and May as well. The ranking on data back to 2001, however, is at the 51.8 percentile of its historic queue of data, marking it as barely above its historic median value – a more or less 'average' reading.

  The recent trend for production has a 4.2 reading in August compared to much stronger readings in May, June and July. However, the percentile standing in August is only at a 40.5 percentile standing in its historic queue of data back to 2001. This marks the reading as substantially below its historic median.

  The 'personal likely trend' for production is meant to get the survey participant to look at their own industry rather than at industry overall. Respondents to the survey expect their personal likely trend will improve in August to 13 from what were much weaker values over the previous three months. This improvement to 13 has a queue percentile standing at its 71.7 percentile which is a reasonably strong reading.

  Orders & demand in August have slipped to a -10 reading in August from -4.7 in July, compared to stronger readings in June and May. At -10, orders & demand have a 70.4 queue percentile standing, a moderately firm reading. Foreign orders & demand also weakened in August, falling to -7.6 from a reading of -4.9 in July and stronger values in June and in May. The August queue standing is at its 70th percentile, like the standing for orders & demand overall.

  August inventory levels are up to 16.6 in August from 9.3 on July and represent an elevated level compared to June and May as well. This is a high reading at the 94th percentile of its historic queue of data.

  Price trends show their own likely price trend at 39.7 in August, up from 35.3 in July. However, this is a weaker reading than in June and in May by a substantial margin. However, the August reading still has a queue percentile standing in the 96.8 percentile: that is within the top 4% of all observations back to 2001. Firms clearly are raising their own prices.

  Manufacturing prices overall are seeing weakening month-to-month as August has a 55.3 reading compared to July at 63.3 and even stronger levels in June and in May. The manufacturing price level has a 95.5 percentile standing, just slightly weaker than for own prices. These readings indicate continued price pressures for the period ahead.

  Looking at these survey responses compared to what they were before COVID struck, in January 2020, we have the industry climate index higher by only one point. Manufacturing production expectations are higher by less than one point. The recent production trend is higher by 5.4 points while the personal likely trend is up by 4.2 points. Orders & demand as well as foreign orders & demand are both weaker by 0.2 points. Prices, however, are hugely stronger than they were before COVID struck. The price index for the own likely price trend is up by 37 points; the manufacturing level is up by 49 points. Clearly firms have experienced a lot of inflation since COVID struck and their perceptions of prices remain high as we've seen from the percentile standings.

  by:Robert Brusca

  |in:Economy in Brief
• 

  Finland| Aug 24 2022

  Finland's PPI Edges Lower

  Inflation in the euro area is and continues to be excessive. Finland continues to follow along with the pack. Finland’s PPI is up by 28.9% over 12 months, it's up at a 36.4% annual rate over six months and then it has “cooled" to a 27.3% annualized pace over three months. Ranked among a group of 14 European countries - mostly European Monetary Union members- Finland's year-over-year inflation rate in June stand at 9th among this group of 14 members. At that time, Finland's year-over-year inflation rate was 31.6% compared to 35.9% for the European Monetary Union overall at that time; the highest inflation rate among this group of countries in Europe was Belgium where inflation was up 50.5%, followed by Spain at 43.4%, and then Italy at 42.0%. Finland’s PPI inflation ranks ninth among these 14 members in June; that means that Finland is one of the middling inflation countries in Europe (This comparison group consisted of Germany, France, Italy, Spain, Portugal, Austria, Denmark, Greece, Ireland, the Netherlands, Finland, Sweden, Belgium, and Luxembourg).

  In July, Finland's producer price index fell by 1%; it had risen by 3.2% in June and by 4% in May.

  The price of manufacturing goods fell by 2.1% in July after rising 3.2% in June and 3.1% in May.

  Within the manufacturing sector, consumer durable goods prices rose by 0.5% in July, consumer nondurable goods prices rose by 2.1% and investment goods saw prices rise by 0.3%. These increases show continued acceleration. Consumer durable goods prices had fallen by 0.2% in June, consumer nondurable goods prices had risen by 1.3% in June, and investment goods prices in July rose at the same pace as in June of 0.3%. The relief of headline price pressure in Finland reflects intermediate and raw goods whose prices are reflecting weakness in oil and other raw materials.

  Manufacturing price momentum Demand continues to pull other prices higher. For all of manufacturing, prices gained 28.2% over 12 months and accelerate to a 44.3% annual rate over six months but then price gains dropped back sharply to a 17.2% annual rate over three months.

  This progression is echoed ever so slightly by consumer durable goods where prices rise by 11.4% over 12 months, accelerate to rise by 17.4% over six months and then prices barely cool their trend rising by a 16.6% annualized over three months.

  Consumer nondurable goods prices are up by 13.3% over 12 months, they accelerate to a rise of 18.3% annualized over six months and accelerate further rising at a 23.7% pace over three months. Nondurables are still experiencing clear price acceleration.

  Investment goods prices rise at a 10.4% annual rate over 12 months and 11.3% annual rate over six months, a small acceleration, and then decelerate to an 8.8% pace over three months.

  by:Robert Brusca

  |in:Economy in Brief