Haver Analytics
Haver Analytics

Economy in Brief

  • You may recognize the excerpted headline quote as ‘borrowing’ from U.S. Admiral David Farragut. It is a famous quote from a U.S. Civil war battle in which he charged ahead in his ship regardless of the risk. This month the global manufacturing PMIs themselves are charging ahead regardless of the rise of inflation, the war in Ukraine, the war in Iran, the closure or impedance in the Strait of Hormuz, and the mucking up of oil and nonoil supply lines. Full speed ahead!

    Trend... The chart shows an ongoing recovery in manufacturing. It also shows that conditions are only ‘better’ and not ‘strong.’ Yet when we rank these individual PMIs against their historic results back to January 2022, the median rank across these 18 reporters is 90.8%, signaling that they have been higher less than 10% of the time back to 2022. Of course, 2022-2023 represented low points for manufacturing after COVID. There was a strong recovery from COVID and then the sucker-punch from the invasion of Ukraine by Russia. Nonetheless, on that timeline, recovery is still in progress and—so far—not even the war in the Middle East and other geopolitical turmoil, including a real donnybrook within NATO, has sidetracked it, despite the impact on oil prices. That may not last, but it is the current situation.

    A test for central banks With inflation rising, central banks are being put to the test. They failed the post-COVID test and waited too long to hike rates. We did get recovery but inflation, too. Will they do that again? Or will they hike rates sooner? Will they try not to make the same mistake and make, instead, a new mistake by getting too tight too soon? Markets simply do not know. But in the U.S. and U.K., there are five years of missing monetary inflation targets, and in other key countries the inflation targets also have been broadly missed, even if headline inflation recently had dipped into the target range in the last few months or so. Central banks are facing a challenge after their last challenge was not met with success and after a relatively long period—a solid legacy—of missing on the promises they made to the public on inflation.

    Solid PMI trends: The sequential, as well as the current, monthly data show how widespread change has been tilted in a positive direction. While conditions are broadly better, the current month’s median reading is only at a PMI value of 52.4. So, manufacturing conditions are only slightly above breakeven (a PMI of 50), but they have been weak for so long that this is an exceptionally strong reading compared to the last four and half years of results.

    Some examples: The weak manufacturing readings on the month by ranking are for Turkey, Russia, India, and Indonesia. However, these are own-PMI comparisons, and India is one of the strongest readings in April on a cross-section basis (compared to other countries in April, rather than to its own history) having the third strongest manufacturing reading in April. Malaysia, South Korea, Taiwan, and Japan each have the strongest readings (or nearly so) since January 2022; as a result, Taiwan and Japan also rank one and two among 19 reporter readings in April. South Korea ranks sixth. But Malaysia has been so weak; it still ranks only 11th despite a 99.2% high-low standing.

    In Sum: The bottom line is that recovery has not been derailed—yet. But this is only an April report. Given time, this rebound could be untracked. It is only a rebound from the lows. So, the expansion is still at risk, even with global labor markets still tight based on unemployment readings. Economic growth is a slippery slope; the trend is only your friend until it turns on you.

    • ISM Mfg. PMI at 52.7 in Apr. and Mar.; fourth consecutive month of expansion.
    • Production (53.4) expands for the sixth straight mth.; new orders (54.1) for the fourth successive mth.
    • Employment (46.4) contracts for the 31st straight mth.; at a four-month low.
    • Prices Index (84.6) highest since Apr. ’22; prices rising for the 19th consecutive mth.
    • Exports (47.9) contract; imports (50.3) still grow but at a three-month low.
  • Europe
    | May 01 2026

    GDP Remains Weak in EMU

    GDP growth in Europe in the first quarter of 2026 continued to be weak. First-quarter annualized growth at 0.6% followed a fourth-quarter annualized growth rate at 0.8%. Year-over-year growth in the monetary union logged a 0.8% annual rate; that represents a slowdown from earlier quarters where the growth rates were generally above 1% and more on the order of 1.5% at an annual rate.

    Early GDP reporters in EMU Among the 8 early reporters of GDP in the first quarter, in the table, only three posted growth pickups compared to the previous quarter. Those were Belgium, with a growth rate in the first quarter annualized at 0.8%, up from 0.2% in Q4 2025; Germany, where the growth rate picked up to 1.3% in the first quarter from 1.0% in Q4; and Ireland, with a dubious acceleration of growth to a -7.8% annualized rate, improving from -14.5% annualized in Q4.

    Big country, small country The table also looks at growth divided into the four largest economies in the monetary union versus the rest of the monetary union. There we see a growth rate of 1% for the four largest economies, a slowdown from 1.3% in the fourth quarter. For the rest of the monetary union, the growth rate held at 0.5% in the first quarter, the same rate logged in the fourth quarter.

    Median growth The median growth rate among these reporters was 0.6%, the same as for the weighted growth rate in the EMU, while the median in the fourth quarter was 1.5% compared to a weighted growth rate for the monetary union at 0.8%.

    Ranking the growth rates vs. their own histories The ranking data on the far-right column rank growth in the first quarter on its year-over-year growth pace. On a historic profile, we see only three monetary union reporters with growth in the first quarter at a rate that exceeds median on data back to the 1990s. Those economies are Italy with a 52.2 percentile ranking, Spain with a 53.3 percentile ranking, and Portugal with a 65.2 percentile ranking. For the monetary union as a whole, the growth rate rank is 28.3%, placing it at a ranking between its lower 1/4 and lower 1/3. The median for the monetary union among these early reporting countries is a 32.6 percentile growth rate, and these compared to the United States where the growth rate has a 60.2 percentile standing.

    Other data sources report that growth in the services sector has been extremely weak, while there actually has been some resilience in manufacturing. That is somewhat surprising given the Middle East War that affects the world trade and global supply chains. New disruptions because of war in the Middle East are a new fact of life. However, war itself sometimes is a stimulant to some forms of growth. These sector trends will be for us to watch, but for right now growth rates are not impressive and they're certainly not gaining momentum.

  • Against a backdrop of persistent geopolitical tensions, firmer energy prices and a busy week of central bank meetings—including the Fed, ECB, BoE and BoJ—financial markets have remained notably resilient, even as the macro narrative has softened at the margin. The message from this week’s charts is one of growing tension beneath that surface calm. Front-end bond yields have moved higher, signalling a shift toward a more cautious, “higher-for-longer” policy outlook (chart 1). At the same time, real-time recession indicators for the United States suggest risks remain contained for now (chart 2). Consumer confidence data paint a more uneven picture, with sharper declines in the euro area and UK than in the US, highlighting regional vulnerabilities to the current energy shock (chart 3). The ECB’s latest bank lending survey reinforces this, pointing to tighter credit conditions and weaker demand—factors that are likely to weigh further on European growth (chart 4). By contrast, developments in the semiconductor sector underline a different dynamic: an intensifying global boom, with accelerating price pressures reflecting both strong AI-driven demand and emerging supply-side constraints linked indirectly to energy and logistics disruptions (chart 5). Finally, labour market data confirm that the AI surge is not merely a market narrative but a tangible structural shift, with hiring for AI-related roles accelerating across economies (chart 6). Taken together, these signals point to a more complex macro environment—one in which resilient markets coexist with softening growth, more persistent inflation risks and increasingly delicate policy trade-offs.

    • Robust business investment led the advance; moderate support from consumers.
    • Government spending jumped with the reopening of most federal agencies.
    • The trade sector remained volatile, making a sizeable negative contribution in Q1.
    • The PCE price index jumped 0.7%, reflecting an 11.6% m/m surge in energy prices.
    • The core index was up 0.3%, in line with expectations but still well above the Fed’s target.
    • Personal income increased 0.6% m/m, led by a 0.4% m/m rise in compensation.
    • Personal consumption jumped 0.9% m/m with a slight upward revision to February.
    • However, much of the March gain in nominal consumption also reflected the jump in energy prices.
    • Real consumption rose by a more modest 0.2% m/m.
    • New claims dropped by 26,000 to 189,000.
    • Continuing claims declined by 23,000 to 1.785 million.
    • The insured unemployment rate remained at 1.2%.
  • Unemployment rates are stable near all-time lows for EMU Unemployment rates in the European Monetary Union (EMU) continued to hover at the lowest level. The EMU all-time low unemployment rate is 6.2%, and that’s the number reported for March. There have been five of these 6.2% unemployment rates monthly in the history of the monetary union.

    Unemployment rates in March saw declines in five of the 12 early reporting countries: the Netherlands, Italy, Finland, Belgium, and Austria. Over the last three months, there were net declines in the unemployment rates in four countries, while year-over-year once again four countries—though a different four—showed declines in the unemployment rate.

    Unemployment rates, evaluated relative to their historic standings, have a median rank standing in their 33.6 percentile. That is the median unemployment rank among these 12 countries; it shows that the unemployment rate is in the lower one-third of its historic rank. Among the 12 early reporting countries, only three failed to have unemployment rate rankings below their 30th percentile; those three are Austria with a 71.3 percentile ranking, Finland with an 80th percentile ranking, and Luxembourg with a 98.8 percentile ranking. So, there are three countries among these 12 that have relatively high unemployment rates compared to their histories, whereas the rest of the reporters have unemployment rates below their respective 30th percentiles.