Economy in Brief

In this week's newsletter, we examine the key takeaways from the National People's Congress (NPC) in China. Initially, we highlight the government's economic objectives for the year ahead, including for a real GDP growth of "around" 5% and an inflation rate of "around" 3%. Following this, we examine potential obstacles that could impede China's achievement of these targets, including persisting drags from China’s property sector and still-subdued domestic inflation. We move next to take stock of China’s latest hard data, which revealed consensus-beating growth in the manufacturing and retail sectors. We note, however, that any interim stabilization is likely still in nascent stages. Subsequently, we analyze China's ambitions for its labour market, taking into account underlying trends of rural migration and broader demographic challenges. Finally, we investigate China's budgetary strategies for the year, focusing on the government's deficit targets with a nod to its plans for increased special bond issuance. While many would agree that China could do more with fiscal policy given persisting domestic woes, the extent of government debt growth will likely draw continued concerns.

Growth The Chinese government has set a GDP growth target of “around 5%” for 2024, unchanged from its goal for last year. The Chinese economy managed to log real GDP growth of 5.2% in 2023, having just barely exceeded its modest target while grappling with a slew of challenges (chart 1). Namely, China has faced, and continues to face headwinds from a struggling property sector, elevated local government debt levels, and fragile consumer confidence, among others. Also, recent official PMI data reveal a widening divergence between China’s manufacturing and non-manufacturing sectors. Specifically, the PMIs indicate ongoing, albeit mild, contractions in China’s manufacturing sector while the non-manufacturing sector has seen an accelerated pace of expansion.

A cacophony of trends and readings for Japan Japan's surveys for January show broad weakening despite an improvement in the METI service sector reading that rose for the second month in a row. Readings are varied, but they oscillate in a range of moderation to weakness. There is scant evidence of any strength across sectors in these various surveys using different methods of assessment and over various sectors or industries.

The Teikoku construction index improved month-to-month in January. The economy watchers index showed an improvement in employment and in its future index. For the economy watchers survey, those are three improvements in a row for employment and for the futures index. However, there's more weakening going on in January than there is strengthening.

The METI sector indexes showed industry weakening to a 97.6 reading in January from 105.5 in December. The Teikoku indexes show weakening month-to-month in services, wholesaling, retailing, and manufacturing, while in December, retailing, wholesaling, and services had improved monthly. In the economy watchers index, there was weakness in the headline and the retail sector; eating & drinking establishments and services sector readings also eased in January but all four of those surveys came after improvements in December- the economy watchers index itself had increased in each of the two previous months.

The emerging picture for Japan, therefore, is one with mixed performance across the surveys. We can also evaluate these statistics by looking at the growth rankings; for example, the year-over-year ranking of growth rates for indexes or for diffusion levels. The economy watcher diffusion indexes’ growth rates are above historic medians, except for the retail sector, which has a 44-percentile ranking. However, the rankings are not very robust with the highest being the future index with the 65-percentile ranking. The economy watchers index itself has only a 51.7 percentile growth ranking. The ranking on the levels of economy watchers diffusion indexes are higher in the 70th to 80th percentile range except for employment, whose diffusion level standing is below its historic median at its 48.3 percentile.

The Teikoku indexes also are diffusion indexes. We evaluate them on their year-over-year growth first; manufacturing and wholesaling both have growth rankings below their historic medians. The other components have rankings in their mid to low 60th percentiles. If we rank these diffusion indexes on their levels, the manufacturing index has only a 39.5 percentile standing; the rest of the sectors have standings that are in their 60th percentile decile-the exception is construction which is at its 55.8 percentile.